890 likes | 1.34k Views
What We'll Cover. How to" Handle" Difficult People?What does it mean to
E N D
1. Handling the Most Difficult 10% Kevin Huckshorn & Janice LeBel
Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
Implementing Seclusion & Restraint Reduction: Sharing the Experience
June 22, 2007
2. What Well Cover
How to" Handle Difficult People?
What does it mean to handle?
What information needs more focus?
Literature on environmental triggers
Who are the Most Difficult?
What is most difficult?
Who are the most difficult?
Examples of challenges & strategies
Conclusions & recommendations
3. Handling Difficult People? What does Handling connote?
Webster (2001) defines handle, handled, handling as:
a) a part of a tool; a vessel by which it is grasped or held by a hand;
b) to pick up, touch, carry, or deal with;
c) to manage, train or control;
d) to deal or trade in, to perform in a particular way when operated
4. Handling People Apologize for being provocative. But we must get a handle on our language
Has anyone ever felt handled in a job, at home, in the community?
I sure have
5. 5 Handling People What did that feel like?
Do you think that handle, or manage, are words that describe what we do when people come to us for service?
I can only just ask you to think about language and how we all use it, daily in our work
6. The Challenge We initially approached conflict, violence, and the use of S/R, by first addressing the leadership, policy, and process issues that seemed to lead to these problems.
We have noted that many of these challenges are solved when you work through the initial implementation issues.
7. 7 S/R Reduction Strategies Effective Senior Leadership Involvement on a daily basis
S/R use data, graphed and posted on all units
Workforce development that includes both training and HR involvement in orientation and performance
S/R reduction tools that include assessments for violence, injury, trauma hx, safety planning and environmental changes
Inclusion of service users and families in operations and as staff
Rigorous analysis of events, with documentation and follow-up.
8. What is Most Difficult for you? There is no doubt that certain kids and adults on your units are presenting major challenges
We have seen, over and over, that effectively implementing the strategies will change the environment and will provide you will needed skills for most of the clients
My question is: Have you implemented the six strategies fully? What happened? What did not work?
9. 9 What is Most Difficult for you?
Discussion
10. Emerging Workforce Information? We were not able to get your current data but understood that you are trying, as best you can, to reduce S/R use
The following is a synopsis of a current review of the literature regarding practices in MH environments that lead to conflicts and the use of S/R
11. 11 Reducing S/R Use In late 2006, we went back to the literature
The prevention focus caused us to re-think the priorities,as,did the struggles that folks were having in reducing in some settings
We looked again at the MAJOR question
What causes coercion and violence to occur in inpatient settings, in the first place?
12. 12 Onsite Observations We looked at over 40 years of literature findings to see if any patterns emerged
we drilled down
we found patterns
Seclusion, restraint, and trauma work has illuminated an onion of issues
We have found complicated, systemic patterns of practice and workforce and leadership issues pervasive and often problematic
13. 13 The Importance of Workforce Development Workforce development is a core strategy in both implementing TIC and reducing violence
However, workforce development mostly given short shrift in health settings
Result: facilities have failed to realize the amount of attention required in this domain
The work required to train our direct care workforce is huge, given the turnover and budgetary constraints
But it is paramount, possibly 2nd only to leadership effectiveness
14. 14 Staff/Consumer Conflict + Hx = Violence, Trauma, Injuries + Deaths in Inpatient and Residential Settings These are the core factors that have brought us to this point in time
We have struggled to deal with these issues
Often have chosen control and coercion, not knowing what else worked
These dilemmas characterize traditional practice
15. 15 Traditional Approaches to Violence in Mental Health Settings Professionals have mostly focused on the patient as the cause of violence, we were trained in this model
The focus? Demographic & Clinical Characteristics
Age, race, diagnosis, certain symptoms, substance abuse history, foster care or DJJ involvement, forensic involvement, medication compliance
Result: We still cannot predict violence well, this approach has not reduced events, but this approach gave us a rationale to lean on to explain violence
16. 16 Internal Model of Violence The Internal Model is used for many reasons - including ease of research methodologies, lack of knowledge, and an insidious discriminatory paradigm
The them not us focus is more comfortable and does not result in any changes in our own behaviors
Is convenient but often inaccurate
(Duxbury, 2002)
17. 17 External Model The External Model is another way to look at violence causal factors (has emerged from UK)
(Duxbury, 2002)
This approach takes another view of violence, by asking: What is the role of the environment in violent events?
18. 18 Institutional Cultures Unit norms included the need for physical restraint and its not you we dont trust
Roles for non-professional nursing staff included enforcing, policing, supermanning, and putting on a show
New staff were introduced and coerced into compliance with these roles and were punished by peer staff if they did not
(Morrison, 1989)
19. 19 Literature on Causes of Violence
The Present In 1985, Robert Okin, MD looked at a variety of psychiatric hospitals use of S/R in one state alone, for 5 months
He found that use of S/R varied significantly and differences could not be explained by patient demographics or pre-admit aggressive behavior
He concluded that factors related to the individual hospitals practices and conditions were responsible for these different rates of use
(Okin, 1985)
20. 20 Literature on Violence and S/R Fisher was concerned about injury rates resulting from S/R and noted that staff training was fundamental to safe use and must include (but did not):
Informing staff about issue (S/R)
Attitude therapy (for staff)
Understanding the patients perspective
Training on appropriate staff responses
(Fisher, 1994)
21. 21 Recent Literature on Causes of Violence Petti, Mohr, & Somers performed another review in 2001 and found current studies inconclusive and focused on the patient as cause of restraint use. This studys findings included:
The medical record jargon did not adequately describe events, for instance, aggressive could mean anything from cursing to spitting to hitting
22. 22 Recent Literature on Causes of Violence A need for a more precise assessment on event antecedents instead of the repetitive rationale of safety
An attitude change in staff, led by leaders, that valued and learned from the consumers experience, and
The need to understand, better, why staff reported these events very differently than service users did
(Petti, Mohr, & Somers, 2001)
23. 23 Core Issue: Shame and Humiliation Gilligan, in his prison research identified shame/humiliation as core element in violence
Garbarino addresses the impact of trauma on boys & predilection to antisocial behavior by regaining control through aggression
Denial of abuse and emotions
Explosion with little provocation hypersensitivity when not feeling respected
(Gilligan & Lee, 2004; Garbarino, 1999) 1st bullet -Exquisite vulnerability to being demeaned and need to ward off vulnerability and replace with feeling of pride..
2nd bullet - The boys deny the abuse and feel it is unsafe to have emotions and regain control through antisocial behavior and aggression as survival strategies.1st bullet -Exquisite vulnerability to being demeaned and need to ward off vulnerability and replace with feeling of pride..
2nd bullet - The boys deny the abuse and feel it is unsafe to have emotions and regain control through antisocial behavior and aggression as survival strategies.
24. 24 Recent Literature on Causes of Violence Another study in 2004 studied 215 assaults in a 2-month time frame. Significant causal factors to violence were staff verbal directions, re-directions, and limit setting vs. service user age, history with DJJ, diagnosis, and gender.
(Ryan, Hart, Messick, Aaron, & Burnette, 2004)
25. 25 Recent Literature on Causes of Violence DOrio and colleagues (2004) found that addressing two factors led to the 39% decrease in the use of S/R. These factors were:
Improved management of problematic behaviors by staff
Improved monitoring by staff
(DOrio, Puselle, Stevens, & Garlow, 2004)
26. 26 Recent Literature on Causes of Violence Hinsby & Baker, published a study in 2004, by gathering data from service users and nurses using a qualitative approach.
They found 5 themes describing violent incidents: loss of control by the service user; nurse role ambiguity between caring and controlling; a paternalistic model of care; an expectation to follow the rules; and an acceptance of violence as normative.
27. 27 Emergency Services Stefan (2006) interviewed hundreds of staff and service users of psychiatric emergency services and EDs
She found that most conflicts resulted from:
Threats or use of force (security, weapons, mace, seclusion, handcuffs) before anyone asked what was wrong
Disrespectful forced searches, by either sex
Forced disrobing
Refusal to allow companions, including animals to stay
28. 28 Emergency Services Forced Medication without consent
Ignoring medical complaints, discrimination due to psychiatric labels
Staff attitudes of contempt, derision, skepticism
Lack of privacy or confidentiality
Long delays
Lack of translators, including signing
Lack of understanding of Trauma
29. 29 So what does this mean?
Where does this leave us?
30. 30 Inconvenient Truths? We professionals have been poorly prepared and expected to work from intuition; lacking sophisticated theory, philosophy, or best practice interventions to improve safety
We have been conditioned, in some settings, to an acceptance of ineffective, often non-existent, leadership or supervision on best practice
We have been inculcated to insidious, discrimination as evidenced in practices and language
We have rarely or never been introduced to an understanding of role of institutional triggers in violence
31. 31 Inconvenient Truths? Our practices have not changed in any significant manner, over the last 30 years, as evidenced by:
Many homogeneous treatment activities, one size fits all
a lack of risk prevention
a lack of individualized treatment planning or full use of assessment information
the exclusion of service users/family members from service planning and
a primary focus on control to manage
32. 32 Lessons Learned Seems we could be missing the boat in so far as addressing the causal factors leading to use of S/R
As leaders we need to:
Redefine our personal treatment philosophies, values, and desired outcomes including the elimination of coercion
Understand how to assure for and measure adequate staff leadership, supervision, & training (Anthony, 2004)
33. 33 Lessons Learned We must acknowledge:
That we may not have factored in our own contributions to institutional violence
That some of our practices are discriminatory, in care settings
And that we may be unaware or in denial about the outcomes of actual practices in the systems of care that we oversee
34. 34
35. 35 Next Steps S/R reduction has become for us the outside skin of an onion; its link is key to developing recovery oriented care
If we are truly committed to reducing coercion, conflict, coercion and S/R for the people and families you serve, this shift will require Deep Change (Quinn, 1996)
Kuhn said paradigm shifts are revolutions
36. 36 Deep Change Quinn says that change can be incremental or Deep and that the more familiar is the former (1996)
Deep change requires more of us on board quicker
It includes new ways of thinking, behaving, is discontinuous with the past, and irreversible once begun
walking naked into uncertainty
(p. 3)
This is transformational change
37. 37 A Thought to Ponder
Martin Luther King, Jr. said:
Violence is the language of the unheard
This seems to be a particularly germane
statement regarding our problems with violence.
We hope that this training will help you to go
farther in this work.
38. 38 References Anthony, W. A. (2004, Fall) Overcoming obstacles to a recovery-oriented system: The necessity for state-level leadership. NASMHPD/NTAC e-Report on Recovery. Retrieved November 28, 2004 from http://www.nasmhpd.org/publications(http://www.nasmhpd.org/publications)
DOrio, B.M., Purselle, D., Stevens, D., & Garlow, S.J.(2004). Reduction of episodes of seclusion and restraint in a psychiatric emergency service. Psychiatric Services, 55, 581-583.
Duxbury, J. (2002). An evaluation of staff and patient views of and strategies employed to manage inpatient aggression and violence on one mental health unit: A pluralistic design. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9, 325-337
39. 39 References Fisher, W. A. (1994). Restraint and seclusion: A review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1584-1591.
Garborino, J. (1999)
Gilligan and Lee
Morrison, E.F. (1989). The tradition of toughness: A study of the nonprofessional nursing care in psychiatric facilities. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22, 1, 32-38.
Okin, R.L. (1985). Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint. Psychiatric Services, 36, 648-652.
40. 40 References Petti, T.A., Mohr, W.K., & Somers, J.W. (2001). Perceptions of seclusion and restraint by patients and staff in an intermediate-term care facility. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 14, 3, 115-127.
Quinn, R. (1996). Deep change. San Francisco: Josey-Bass, Inc
Ryan, E.P., Hart, V.S., Messick, D.L., Aaron, J., & Burnette, M. (2004). A prospective study of assault against staff by youths in a state psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services, 55, 665-670.
Stefan, S. (2006). Emergency Department Treatment of the Psychiatric Patient. New York: Oxford University Press
Websters Dictionary. (2001). Random House, (4th Ed). New York: Ballentine Books
41. 41 Next, Janice will talk about people with challenging issues and what the literature indicates
42. 42 Who are the Most Difficult? People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities?
People with Sociopathy?
People with Aggression & Violence?
43. 43 Implicit Challenge to theMost Difficult Difficulty is in the eye of the beholder
No one definition of what is most difficult
No common description of who is most difficult
Defies standard definition and eludes treatment algorithms and practice parameters
44. 44 People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
The Research:
70% - 85% of people with DD referred for psychiatric consultation have one or more untreated, under treated or undiagnosed medical problems influencing their behavior (Ryan and Sunada, 1997; Sundheim et al., 1998).
Search for secondary medical conditions that contribute to /cause the apparent extreme behavior / psychosis (Szymanski et al., 1990).
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.intellectualdisability.info/diagnosis/psychosis_rr.htm
45. 45 People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
The Research:
Individuals with developmental disabilities are at increased risk for abuse as compared to the general population
(NCTSN, 2004; Gil, 1970; Mahoney & Camilo, 1998; Ryan, 1994)
60% and 100% (depending on sample) of individuals with DD have experienced trauma, usually repeated incidents of abuse (Sobsey, 1994)
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from
http://www.intellectualdisability.info/diagnosis/psychosis_rr.htm
46. 46 People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities Data From NCTSN: (www.NCTSNet.org)
Risk of abuse increases by 78 percent due to exposure to the "disabilities service system alone (Sobsey & Doe, 1991).
Sexual abuse incidents are almost four times as common in institutional settings as in the community (Blatt & Brown, 1986).
Ninety-nine percent of those who commit abuse are well known to, and trusted by, both the child and the child's care providers (Baladerian, 1991).
47. 47 People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome
Rare genetic disorder, linked to recessive x gene
Enzyme deficiency, neurological disorder, retardation, extreme self-mutilating behavior particularly self-biting, head-banging
Treatment of symptoms, no cure, early death
Cornelia de Lange Syndrome
Confirm by genetic testing, confused with FAS
Possible developmental delay, aggressiveness, self-mutilation, a lack of interpersonal connectiveness, self-stimulation, repetitive motions, and rigidity of behavior
Treatment: systemic / interdisciplinary
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/lesch_nyhan/lesch_nyhan.htm
48. 48 General Recommendations Slow down your speech
Use visuals whenever possible to reinforce verbal messages: draw pictures & write down suggestions
Present information one item at a time
Ask for feedback after each item to ensure clear comprehension
Be specific in making suggestions for change
Practice different ways of handling tough situations the client is likely to encounter
(Avrin, Charlton, Tallant, 1998)
49. 49 General Recommendations Format treatment / interventions so that several repeats of key information occur.
Work on building coping skills rather than insight.
Change will occur more slowly than with others. Measure change with a micrometer rather than a yardstick.
Effective treatment for people must include a variety of support and education services for families and caregivers. (Avrin, Charlton, Tallant, 1998)
50. People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy This condition of missing conscience is called by other names, most often "sociopathy," or the somewhat more familiar term psychopathy.
Guiltlessness was the first personality disorder to be recognized by psychiatry, and terms that have been used at times over the past century include: manie sans délire, psychopathic inferiority, moral insanity, and moral imbecility.
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.cix.co.uk/~klockstone/spath.htm
51. 51 People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy The Research:
Sociopathy prevalence is approximately 4% of the population which is seemingly low until it is compared to:
Schizophrenia prevalence which is approximately 1% of the population
20% of the prison population has sociopathy, but this group accounts for more than 50% of the most serious crimes (Stout, 2005)
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.uchc.edu/ocomm/newsarchive/news05/mar05/killers.html
52. 52 People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy The Research:
Some neurological research suggests that socipaths process emotionally laden and neutral stimuli in a similar manner and do not distinguish the difference which is consistent with their inability to process emotional experience (Stout, 2005; Intrator et al, 1997)
Sociopathy is often comorbid with substance abuse. Research indicates:
75% sociopaths may be alcohol dependent
50% sociopaths may be addicted to other drugs (Regier et al., 1990)
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.uchc.edu/ocomm/newsarchive/news05/mar05/killers.html
53. People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy
The Research:
Quetiapine (Seroquel) was effective with Antisocial Personality Disordered-patients in a maximum security psychiatric hospital. Results included a decrease in: impulsivity, hostility, aggressiveness, irritability, and rage reactions. Typical dosage was 600 to 800 mg per day. Patients attributed their willingness to comply with quetiapine treatment to both the effectiveness of the drug and its favorable adverse-event profile.
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://ijo.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/47/5/556
54. People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy Sobering Recommendations:
Can an adult with sociopathy or psychopathy change?
Usually not. It seems that if you don't develop a conscience early, it's hard to get one."
Nick DeMartinis, MD, U.Conn (2005)
Strategies
If you recognize a sociopath, the best way to protect yourself is to avoid him or her. Psychologists do not usually like to recommend avoidance, but in this case, I make a very deliberate exception."
Martha Stout, Ph.D., The Sociopath Next Door (2005)
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.uchc.edu/ocomm/newsarchive/news05/mar05/killers.html
55. People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy Sobering Recommendations:
Higgins: Sociopaths think they're always right and will normally resist attempts at therapy. If they do agree to therapy they will try and subvert the process, particularly in a group context. You can't negotiate or bargain with psychopaths."
Retrieved from http://www.cix.co.uk/~klockstone/spath.htm
56. People with Sociopathy/Psychopathy The Dilemma:
No consensus about terminology: psychopathy v. sociopathy
Diagnosis often mis-used
Likely reflects early history of family turmoil, & comorbid substance abuse
No consensus about treatment approaches
No consensus about treatment benefit or efficacy
No consensus about outcomes
57. People with Aggression & Violence Defining the Issue
Some Research
Suggested Resources
Successful Strategies
58. 58 What is aggressive?What is violent? Defining assaultive, aggressive behavior is an extraordinary challenge. It has been likened to taking a stroll through a semantic jungle (Bandura, 1973) and stymied international leaders for years.
A case in point: In 1923, the League of Nations established a committee to define what constituted aggressive acts. Fifty years later, they finally submitted their 350-word report to the United Nations and ultimately left the task of definition to the United Nations Security Council. (LeBel, 1988; Cairns, 1979).
59. 59 Types of Aggression Different Types Different Dimensions
Instrumental Verbal
Hostile Physical
Relational Written
Territorial Indirect
Fear-induced (internet, stalking)
Predatory
Maternal / Paternal
Irritable
60. 60 People With Aggression & Violence The Research:
Research indicates that, at best, trained mental health professionals alone can predict the potential for violence somewhat better than chance (53%).
(Mossman, 1994; Lidz, Mulvey & Gardner, 1993; Janofsky, Spears, Neubauer, 1988)
The capacity to predict violence increases when multiple sources of data are used.
(Heilbrun, 2003; Mossman, 1994; Lidz, Mulvey & Gardner, 1993; McNeil & Binder, 1991)
61. 61 People With Aggression & Violence Previous violent behavior #1 individual risk factor for re-occurrence
Previous history physical or sexual aggression
History of homelessness or Trauma
Previous history of S/R use
Command hallucinations
Intoxication or detoxification
Planned Aggression vs. Spontaneous
62. 62 People With Aggression & Violence The Research:
Anti-prison model created by James Gilligan, M.D. Reduced recidivism 83% in CA pilot programs
Far from deterring violent behavior, punishment is by far the most powerful stimulus of violent behavior that we know. Today's prisons treat humans like animals, and then we are surprised when prisoners act like animals."
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.nelmh.org/page_view.asp?c=6&fc=009025&did=2575
63. 63 People With Aggression & Violence The Research:
One of the most effective programs to reduce recidivism is a college education.
In Massachusetts, after 30 years, only 1% of prisoners who had received a bachelor's or master's degree while in prison were returned to prison for a new crime. In contrast, the usual rate of repeat offenders is 65% within the first 3 years following release from prison.
In the 1990s, Congress repealed Pell grants for prisoners. In the name of being "tough on crime," the most effective program discovered for reducing crime and violence was eliminated.
64. 64 People With Aggression & Violence Other Effective Strategies:
Cognitive skills training
CBT
DBT
Inclusion of family members
Retrieved on June 3, 2007 from http://www.nelmh.org/page_view.asp?c=6&fc=009025&did=2575
65. 65 People With Aggression & Violence
The Research:
Clozapine has proven superior to haloperidol and risperidone and at least equivalent to olanzapine in the management of violent behavior among patients with thought disorders.
Compared with placebo, patients in a study who received Seroquel demonstrated significantly greater improvements in symptoms of aggression and hostility in all areas measured by the study protocol.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/501527
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=26328
66. 66 People With Aggression & Violence The Third Side:
Part of the Global Negotiation Project
at Harvard http://www.thirdside.org
Taking the Third Side means:
Seeking to understand both sides of the conflict
Encouraging a process of cooperative negotiation
Supporting a wise solution that fairly meets the essential needs of both sides and the community
67. 67 What is the Third Side? Who are the Thirdsiders? We are.
68. 68 The Third Side Violence Schemata
Retrieved on June 14, 2007 from http://www.thirdside.org/overview.cfm
69. 69 Use Tools & Resources Use Tools
Nobully.com
Bullyonline.org
The Broset Violence Checklist:
http://home.no.net/bvc2/
The McArthur Violence Risk Assessment:
http://macarthur.virginia.edu/risk.html
Blueprints for Violence Prevention:
http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/
Violence Institute of NJ
http://www.umdnj.edu/vinjweb
CDC
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/dvp.htm
Surgeon Generals Report http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/youthviolence/
70. Example of Successful Intervention Mr. Weeks A very large 40 year old man with Psychotic & Anti-social DO in a forensic hospital for assaultive behavior. He is not able to verbally process but does admit to bad thoughts. Due to a history of and reliance upon extensive restraint use, Mr. Weeks would precipitate situations in which he was restrained and seemed to rely on such containment.
71. Example of Successful InterventionMr. Weeks Effective Strategy:
Staff made a deal with him to use a vibrating pillow in exchange for restraints. Mr. Weeks liked the softness, buzzing sound and motion of pillow. He couldnt identify warning signs but would ask staff to use pillow if needed.
Historical Experience:
One of the highest users of restraint and considered untreatable.
72. Example of Successful InterventionJulissa A 13 year old young woman with intellectual disability (FS IQ 60) and a severe trauma history including abuse, neglect, abandonment, and rape by a family member. She has been hospitalized > 20 times, placed/tossed from specialized residential placements in 3 states, and considered impossible to treat. When distressed she urinates spontaneously, yells, flaps her arms and hands, bites and severely self-injures herself and staff who try to stop her.
73. Example of Successful Intervention Julissa Effective Strategy:
Brought in experienced OT, analyzed behavior, and created flexible, sensory-based interventions:
Built a cardboard box her house to have nearby to create her own physical containment on her terms
Gave her chewlery to wear and bite on when distressed
Created oral intervention sessions w/oral massagers to teach proprioception & biting modulation
Anticipated need with crunchy fruits/vegetables at peak times
74. Example of Successful Intervention Bruce A 17 year old young man with history of physical abuse by father, neglect, and social victimization / bullying at school. Hospitalized forensically on multiple counts of animal cruelty, mutilation and homicidal threats to peers. Socially withdrawn, preoccupied with death, unwilling to participate in programming, threatening to kill if forced to attend groups. Efforts to get Bruce to school/groups consistently lead to violent restraints and severe injuries to staff.
75. Example of Successful Intervention Bruce Effective Strategy:
Program Director dumped the rules - allowed Bruce to isolate in his room. Staff told to keep hands-off. As relationship developed with therapist, trust led to change. School work brought to him, slow movement out of room, outdoor time started in evenings and progressed to day time, OT identified weighted item preference, once willing to try group activities, he wore a weighted vest underneath shirt to feel supported - no one knew - no restraint/seclusion occurred.
76. 76 Example of Successful Intervention Eva A 59 year old woman who was dropped off and raised at a State Hospital from 12 55 yo. Eva was placed in an adult group home and bounced from hospital to hospital. She was black listed by most ERs. When admitted to a local hospital, staff threatened to quit, and some walked out rather than deal with Eva again and her chronic screaming, disrobing, smearing, sexualized response to restraint and nightly chanting, Frankie stole the cherries.
The hospital took a fresh look, met with the family repeatedly and ultimately confirmed, Eva had been repeatedly raped as a child by her brother at night. She was a horrifically traumatized, trauma-survivor.
77. 77 Example of Successful Intervention Eva Effective Strategy:
The hospital began to:
create choice, control and safety (what time to go to bed, if she wanted to be in groups, night light in bedroom, closing the door)
name and identify her rage and what helped to soothe her. Her greatest comfort as a child when her Irish grandmother sang to her. Staff started to sing to Eva at night to help her fall asleep. It worked. The screaming/chanting/smearing stopped.
Eva was given a choice of where she went next. She chose a nursing home. She stayed and was not readmitted to the acute unit again.
78. 78 Example of Successful Intervention Juan A 31 year old man with mild-moderate intellectual disability and mental illness and an extensive history of impulsive assaults and property destruction. Juan was hospitalized in an acute unit, floridly psychotic, and intermittently agreeing to take his medication. In a paranoid rage, he picked up the unit television, carried it to the nurses station and was about to hurl through the safety glass partition.
79. 79 Example of Successful Intervention Juan Effective Strategy:
The fast-thinking Nurse Manager jumped up, took a stress ball out of her pocket and offered to trade items with Juan ... He traded ... without incident. Staff created an OT plan and made sure he (and they) had stress balls and soft hand-held items. As long as Juan was holding something he wasnt throwing or hitting.
80. 80 Conclusions Paradoxic Clarity in the Challenge:
These challenges are not new and have defied easy answers from experts for many years
Challenges declare themselves through manifest crisis that usually impacts more than one person
These challenges test the organization and treatment culture
No easy answers
No uniform interventions
Require clinical due diligence
81. Conclusions Solutions:
Creative & inspirational
Seldom simple, typically multi-faceted
Tap the best of staff ingenuity
Create situations and lessons learned that people remember
Can lead to new competence & learning
Can create organizational change and staff growth
82. 82 Recommendations Rule out medical problems first, even if previously assessed
Do not rule out trauma presume it and implement TIC practices
Go back to the past, history gets lost FAST obtain and review earlier information, retest/reexamine as indicated
Based on history, is there reasonable perspective on the current challenge? Is the perspective driven by data or legend and lore?
83. 83 Recommendations Essential Strategies:
Transparency: Admit challenge
Gather the Group: More minds the better
Gumby Factor: Flexibility in process & solutions
Do not personalize. Look at the behavior. Whats the meaning?
Involve Consumers & Families
Share Success
84. There will always be people with exceptional challenges who we will not have all the answers for.
It is not the difficulty they present rather, what we do in response to that difficulty.
85. 85 Sage Words for New Staff In the midst of the movement and chaos, keep stillness inside of you
Deepak Chopra
Your role as a helper is to
be things, not to do things
Nar-Anon
86. FINAL THOUGHT: OUR RESPONSE TO THE MOST DIFFICULT Ive come to the frightening conclusion that I am the decisive element in the classroom. My personal approach creates the climate. My daily mood makes the weather. As a teacher, I possess a tremendous power to make a childs life miserable or joyous. I can be a tool of torture or an instrument of inspiration. I can humiliate or humor, hurt or heal. In all situations, it is my response that decides whether a crisis will be escalated or de-escalated and a child humanized or dehumanized.
Haim Ginott, Psychologist & Teacher (1965)
87. DISCUSSION
88. 88 References Avrin, S., Charlton, M., & Tallant, B. (1998). Diagnosis and treatment of clients with developmental disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, Aurora Mental Health Center.
Baladerian, N.J. (1991). Sexual abuse of people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Sexuality and Disability, 9 (4): 323-335.
Blatt, E. R. & Brown, S. W. (1986). Environmental influences on incidents of alleged child abuse and neglect in New York state psychiatric facilities: Toward an etiology of institutional child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10 (2): 171-180
89. 89 References Facts on Traumatic Stress and Children with Developmental Disabilities (2004). National Child Traumatic Stress Network, www.NCTSNet.org
Gil, D. G. (1970). Violence against children: Physical abuse in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress
Mahoney, J. & Camilo, C. (1998). Meeting the needs of crime victims with disabilities. (Draft). Crime Victims Compensation Program Mental Health Treatment Guidelines Task Force.
Patrick, C.J. (Ed.) (2005). Handbook of Psychopathy, Guilford Press, New York
90. 90 References Ryan, R. (1994). Posttraumatic stress disorder in persons with developmental disabilities. Community Mental Health Journal, 30 (1): 45-54.
Sobsey, D. & Doe, T. (1991). Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sexuality and Disability, 9 (3): 243-259.
Stout, M. (2005). The Sociopath Next Door: The Ruthless versus the Rest of Us, Broadway Books, New York