130 likes | 387 Views
Lec 27: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Directional distribution of site traffic. Notice the difference in the trip distribution process between urban transportation planning and site planning Understand several factors affect directional distribution of site-generated traffic
E N D
Lec 27: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Directional distribution of site traffic • Notice the difference in the trip distribution process between urban transportation planning and site planning • Understand several factors affect directional distribution of site-generated traffic • Be familiar with methods used to distribute site traffic to surrounding roads
Directional distribution of site traffic • The assumptions and method used in estimating the direction in which traffic will approach and depart the site will vary with several location-specific conditions, such as; • Size of the proposed development • Type of development (e.g. industrial, commercial, residential, etc.) • Prevailing conditions on the existing street systems • Available data base • Primary market • Analogy • OD (easy said, hard done) • Gravity method (we did this already.) Avoid evaluating TIA based on “mechanical method” A very good warning from the authors. Choose a method appropriate for the situation rather than using a canned procedure. (P.49)
Primary market • The primary market (area-of-influence) method utilizes a unique trade area or area of influence. It is the geographical area from which a high percentage (80%) of the site-generated traffic will be “drawn” to the site. • The boundary of the trade area might be identified by one of the following techniques: • Method 1: Delineate the trade area as a regular geometric shape (a circle or square with the site at the center) with a radius of travel appropriate for the type of development • Method 2: Delineate the trade area by establishing the most distant points that can be reached within some selected travel time over the specific street system • Method 3: Use Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation to establish the boundary between competing centers
Maximum travel times (how far people travel?) • Community shopping center: 15-20 min • Neighborhood shopping: 10 min • Industrial park: 30 min • Residential: peak-hour = 30 min; Other = 20 min Travel time (not distance) and trip purposes are the determinants of trip length.
Method 1: Defining the study area Step 1: Select the appropriate max trip length for the study site Step 2: Draw the selected geometric shape (a circle or a rectangle) with the center located over the site (Steps 2 & 3)
Method 1: Defining the study area (cont) Step 3: Divide the trade area into sections (zones) and determine the amount of activity in each. Step 4: Calculate the proportion of each section (zone) as a percentage of the total primary market area (Step 4)
Method 1: Defining the study area (cont) Step 5: Identify the most logical route from the centroid of each section (zone) to the site. Step 6: Calculate the directional distribution by assigning the percentage from step 4 to the minimum paths identified in step 5. 34%, not 14% (Step 5)
Method 2 • This method uses the travel distance calculated along each route using the appropriate maximum travel time and the travel speed(s) on each street. Results in an irregular geometric shape. Steps 1 and 2. Travel time = say 10 min. Speeds on routes are different resulting in different distances. • Steps 3 through 6 are the same as Steps 3 through 6 of Method 1. (Hah!? No shape shown!)
Method 3: Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation (used when competing markets exist) • Reilly’s law: Pi: size of center I, commonly measured in 1000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area PA PB dA B A dAB A’s market boundary
Method 3: Reilly’s method (used when competing markets exist) (cont) 14 min Once the boundary is defined, the rest is like step 3 though 6 of Method 1. 11 min 15 min (See page 53 for an example)
Analogy (p.54) • Identify existing situations which have the “same” characteristics as expected of the subject. A traffic survey of a similar development in close proximity to the subject site follows this methodology. • In many cases, a manual count of turn movements is sufficient to obtain the necessary data for analysis of the direction of approach. With a large development where there are several approach streets, a license-plate survey might be used (find out how customers drive through the network to get to the site). Subject site Similar site (See p.54 for possible applications)
Analogy (p.54) (cont): Example in p.54 (Turn movements used to determine traffic distribution) (Assumed site-traffic distribution) Find out % distribution: from north or from south Note that these two sites face the same Main St.