1 / 45

Using Aversives in NH

Using Aversives in NH. Scott F. Johnson. Overview. Focus on physical restraints in public schools Some applicability to private schools Terminology Risks Sources of law Changes to NH law

ady
Download Presentation

Using Aversives in NH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Aversives in NH Scott F. Johnson

  2. Overview • Focus on physical restraints in public schools • Some applicability to private schools • Terminology • Risks • Sources of law • Changes to NH law • This PowerPoint and other resources about NH proposed special education regulations are at www.nhedlaw.com

  3. Terminology • Physical restraints defined different ways in different places. • Generally means some physical method of restricting another’s freedom of movement. • Some state laws distinguish holding or escorts that are done without the use of force.

  4. Terminology • NH law does not define restraints, but proposed regulations will. • In general there are three types of restraints: • Physical restraints • Mechanical – devices to limit student movement • Chemical – drugs that alter student behavior

  5. Terminology • Aversives – unpleasant or painful things done to students to discourage unwanted behavior. Range from electric shock, to odor therapy to time out. • Corporal punishment – spanking, slapping, hitting.

  6. Terminology • New Hampshire’s current state special education regulations prohibit public and private schools from using aversive or deprivational measures that subject a child to humiliation, unsupervised confinement, abuse or neglect, or a denial of basic necessities. Ed 1119.02 (e); Ed 1133.07(c).

  7. One more • Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS or PBS). • Important concept with preventing restraints. • A function based approach that looks a number of factors that could affect the student in order to affect change in student behavior. • Can decrease or eliminate need for restraints. • Also part of proposed regulations

  8. PBIS • Covers 4 areas: • Systems change • Environmental alteration • Skill instruction • Behavioral consequence • Group process to evaluate and address all four areas. • Resources on PBIS on website and in book www.edlawrc.com.

  9. Risks • Restraints are a dangerous method of intervention. • A number of children have died while being restrained in other states. One NH student in private Massachusetts school some years ago. • The Child Welfare League of American (CWLA) estimates that between 8 to 10 children die each year due to restraints with numerous others suffering various injuries from bumps and bruises to broken bones (not just in schools). • Also emotional injuries to the students

  10. Risks • Also dangerous for staff • Can be injured physically and emotionally • Trauma of the situation with or without injury to a student • Opens up a variety of legal claims

  11. Risks • One of the leading causes of deaths during restraint is “asphyxia” which is a restriction of the person’s ability to breathe. • It is referred to as restraint associated or positional asphyxia and sometimes called “Sudden Death Syndrome.” • Restraint associated occurs during the process of restraining a person in a manner that causes difficulty with breathing in and out. This leads to insufficient oxygen in the blood which leads to a disturbed heart rhythm which leads to death.

  12. Risks • Any restraint that restricts the free movement of the chest or diaphragm may restrict breathing and contribute to positional or restraint associated asphyxia. • Research shows that “prone restraints” or “floor restraints” are the most dangerous and most likely to cause asphyxia because they involve placing the child face down on the floor which puts pressure on the child’s ribs, chest.

  13. Risks • Students may also have risk factors such as medical conditions that exacerbate the risks of restraints. • Students with asthma, epilepsy or heart conditions can be more prone to have adverse reactions, including death, with certain types of restraints. • Obese students and students taking certain medications may also be more prone to adverse reactions with certain types of restraints.

  14. Risks • As a result of the dangers of prone restraints, some organizations and training programs have advocated that they never be used. • Because of the risks of all types of restraints, many professional organizations and associations involved with children or behavioral health issues take the position that restraints should either not be used at all, or used only to prevent imminent harm to the student or others that cannot be prevented in any other way.

  15. Risks • The child’s treatment or programming should focus on other methods of addressing behavior, such as PBIS. • If restraints are used, it is very important that safety measures to protect the child and the person restraining the child are implemented. • Safety measures include training, monitoring and reporting.

  16. Sources of Law • The law provides parameters • Professional standards are incorporated into the law in various ways • Three main sources of law: • Constitution • Federal Statutes and rules • State statutes and rules

  17. Constitutional Requirements • Due Process protections in 14th amendment apply to all public school students • United States Supreme Court decision Youngberg v. Romeo • Individual has a right to be free from unnecessary or unreasonable restraints • State has an obligation to train individuals performing restraints to ensure safety

  18. Youngberg • Focus is the exercise of professional judgment by qualified professionals • Qualified by education, training or experience • Restraints may be performed only when professional judgment deems necessary to ensure safety

  19. Professional Judgment • Based on standards of professional associations. • Restraints used only in emergency situations to ensure safety of student or others • Not used to punish or for compliance with rules • Last resort when other methods have failed or can’t be used

  20. Professional Judgment • Staff must be trained in restraints and in de-escalation to avoid restraints • Least restrictive form of restraint should be used • Health and safety of student should be monitored during restraint • Restraints should be documented and reported

  21. Due Process Wrap Up Courts provide some deference to decisions about restraint if: 1. Restraints are performed by adequately trained personnel as a last resort when necessary to protect safety of students or others, and 2. Personnel making decisions about whether to restrain or not are qualified professionals based on education training or experience and make decisions based on professional judgment.

  22. IDEA & 504/ADA • IDEA now the IDEIA • Applies only to students with disabilities • Different definitions under the laws of students with disabilities • IDEA applies to all public schools and some private schools • 504 applies to schools that receive any federal funding • ADA applies to public schools and some private schools

  23. IDEA • Does not specifically mention restraints • Does specifically address behavior and PBIS • Has been interpreted as requiring preventative methods like PBIS when possible before using restraints

  24. IDEA • Part of FAPE includes addressing behavior • When behavior impedes learning of student or others team must consider strategies including PBIS to address the behavior. • Functional behavioral assessments are a key component to PBIS. • FBA’s are required in some circumstances with discipline and should be used when assessing behavior and ways to address it.

  25. IDEA • Discussion about appropriate assessments, interventions and supports should occur in IEP team. • Students who require interventions, strategies or supports to address behavior should have that included in their IEP or behavior plan.

  26. IDEA • While preference for PBIS seems inconsistent with physical restraints, the USDOE has not prohibited them under the IDEA. • Courts also have allowed restraints under IDEA.

  27. IDEA • Courts and administrative agencies have followed the IDEA’s preference for PBIS and positive interventions prior to using restraints • Find IDEA violations when restraints are unnecessary or inconsistent with student’s IEP

  28. IDEA By contrast when restraints are performed consistent with requirements of IEP and to protect the student or others generally no violation.

  29. 504/ADA • Prohibits discrimination against students with disabilities. • Some students who are not eligible under IDEA may be protected by 504/ADA • Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has interpreted these statutes as requiring schools to develop behavioral plans for students whose disability related behavior interferes with their ability to receive educational benefit.

  30. 504/ADA • OCR has found the use of restraints violates 504/ADA in some circumstances: • Using restraints to control behavior without fully considering evaluations of qualified individuals • Unilaterally restraining (without consent of parents) 15-20 times in 2 month period. Not in IEP or behavior plan. Strapped student into a wheelchair tied to a radiator. Some lasted 30-45 minutes. • Restraining a student for refusing to listen to directions to move to another location.

  31. 504/ADA By contrast when the restraint is done as a last resort to prevent harm or done pursuant to a behavior plan or IEP, OCR generally finds no violation

  32. Summary of Legal Requirements • Restraints should be viewed as a last resort and performed only when other less restrictive methods have failed or cannot be implemented because of the emergency nature of the situation. • Restraints should be performed only to protect the student or others from imminent physical harm. • Restraints should be performed only for the amount of time necessary to resolve the danger to self or others.

  33. Summary of Legal Requirements • Restraints should be performed with the least amount of force possible to protect the student and others. • Restraints should never be done to punish or force compliance with a rule just for compliance sake (as opposed to complying with a rule that involves protecting a student from imminent harm). • Restraints should only be performed by trained individuals.

  34. Summary of Legal Requirements • Individuals making the decisions about whether to restrain or not to restrain must be qualified professionals who are competent by education, training or experience to make the decision. • Parents should be included in decisions about performing restraints when possible and notified as soon as possible after the restraint.

  35. Summary of Legal Requirements • If restraints are considered for students with disabilities, the student’s IEP team should meet and determine if they will be used and include the decision in a behavior plan, 504 Plan or IEP. • Restraints should then be performed, or not performed, pursuant to the provisions of the behavior plan, 504 Plan or IEP.

  36. PBIS – Proposed State Regs Ed 1114.07 Behavioral Interventions. • Positive behavioral interventions based on the results of a functional behavioral assessment shall serve as the foundation of any program used to address the behavioral needs of students. • PBIS is a comprehensive approach with positive behavioral strategies and supports to address behavior

  37. Aversives - proposed NH regs • Ed 1114.07 • (c) A private facility or other non-district program shall not employ any measure which is aversive or depriving in nature or which subjects a child with a disability enrolled in that program to humiliation or unsupervised confinement or to abuse or neglect as defined in RSA 169-C, the Child Protection Act, or which deprives the child of basic necessities such as nutrition, clothing, communication, or contact with parents, so as to endanger the child's mental, emotional, or physical health • (e) Each private facility or other non-district program shall have a written procedure based on state and federal law concerning the reporting of suspected instances of child abuse.

  38. Aversives - NH proposed regs • Ed 1114.06(f) - An LEA, other public agency, private provider of special education or other non-LEA program shall not employ any aversive behavioral interventions; • Ed 1102.13 - “Aversive behavioral interventions” means those procedures that subject a child with a disability to physical or psychological harm or unsupervised confinement or that deprive the child of basic necessities such as nutrition, clothing, communication, or contact with parents, so as to endanger the child’s physical, mental, or emotional health.

  39. Aversives proposed NH regs Ed 1114.06(g) Aversive behavioral interventions include: (1) Any procedure intended to cause physical pain; (2) Any procedure used as a punishment; (3) Aversive mists, noxious odors, and unpleasant tastes applied by spray or other means to cause an aversive physical sensation; (4) Any non-medical mechanical restraint that physically restricts a student’s movement; (5) Contingent food/drink programs; (6) Electrical stimulation; (7) Placement of a child in an unsupervised or unobserved room from which the child can not exit without assistance; and (8) Physical restraint, unless in response to a threat of imminent, serious, physical harm.

  40. Behavior interventions • Ed 1114.08 Emergency Intervention Procedures. • All crisis or emergency intervention procedures that include restrictive behavioral interventions shall be included in the student’s IEP and shall comply with Ed 1114.07 except as detailed in ED 1114.09

  41. Behavioral Interventions Ed 1114.09 Use of Restrictive Behavioral Interventions. If authorized in writing by a physician and an IEP team, the following interventions may be used. (1) A non-medical mechanical restraint that physically restricts a student’s movement; (2) Physical restraint, not in response to a threat of imminent, serious, physical harm.

  42. Behavioral Interventions Restrictive behavioral interventions may only be used when: • At least 2 written positive behavioral interventions were previously implemented without success; • The individual implementing the restrictive intervention has been trained and is knowledgeable in the use of positive interventions, restrictive treatment procedures, and alternatives for de-escalation of problem behavior; • A behavioral intervention plan detailing the use of the restrictive procedure has been developed and incorporated as a part of the IEP;

  43. Behavioral Interventions (4) A description of the target behavior that will be addressed using the restrictive intervention is included in the IEP; (5) A description of the measurable criteria stating the expected change in the target behavior or behaviors is included in the IEP; (6) A written description of the restrictive behavioral intervention procedure(s) detailed in the IEP; (7) A specific time limit for the use of the restrictive behavioral intervention procedure is detailed in the IEP;

  44. Behavior Interventions (8) A system is developed to record the frequency, duration, and results of the intervention; (9) A system is developed to regularly inform the parents of the progress in changing the target behavior using the restrictive intervention procedures; and (10) The parent or parents have given informed consent to the use of the restrictive intervention procedures separate from the consent for the IEP.

  45. Questions? • The end • Questions?

More Related