180 likes | 307 Views
Support for the integration of modelling in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Georgios Kokogiannakis. Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). EPB Directive 2002/91/EC: Proposal published on 11 May 2001 Came into force on 4 January 2003
E N D
Support for the integration of modelling in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive Georgios Kokogiannakis
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) • EPB Directive 2002/91/EC: • Proposal published on 11 May 2001 • Came into force on 4 January 2003 • On January 2006, Member States have to put the Directive into practice through their own legislation • Objective: promote the cost-effective improvement of energy performance of buildings
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – why? • Europe is worried about the security of Energy Supply • Kyoto protocol obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions • Limited impact on supply but potential savings on demand and mainly at buildings
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – what? • Calls for a common methodology for an integrated energy performance of buildings based on technical annex …integrated… …integrated…
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – what? • Calls for a common methodology for an integrated energy performance of buildings based on technical annex …integrated… …integrated…
Sustainability & Directive • Does the Directive cover the set of aspects that society is interested in during the sustainable design of buildings? • How is it going to evolve?
Sustainability & Directive Acoustics, Local thermal & visual comfort, contaminants concentration, surface condensation, e.t.c….
Integrative modelling • Buildings: • Systematic (many parts make the whole) • Dynamic (the parts evolve at different rates) • Non-linear (the parameters depend on the thermodynamic state) • Complex (myriad interactions)
Integrative modelling • Preserves the integrity of building/plant system • Cheaper & quicker feedback on alternative design approaches • Large number of assessment under realistic conditions
Methodology in UK • Domestic buildings: • Simplified methods (SAP2005 in England and Wales, SERT in Scotland) • Non-domestic buildings: • Detailed thermal modelling software • New simplified tool (NCT) based on the Dutch Standard NEN 2916:1998
Which method? • Is a simplified method enough to cover appropriate the building sustainability issues? • What are the dangers of using such a method? • If modelling: • How should users select modelling tools?
Case studies • Two modelling tools (ESP-r & EnergyPlus) • Simplified method Dutch Standard NEN 2916:1998 Base Case • Heating and cooling loads • Daylight & glare • Peak & Mean Air Temperatures • Overheating risk • Thermal comfort • …… • Change orientation • Change constructions • Change occupancy patterns • Change climate • Change ventilation strategies • Change shading strategies
Case studies • Inability of the simplified method to deal with some of the assessments • Simplified method – not “simplified” for use • Simplified method produces different results than the two modelling tools • Differences in some cases between the results of the two modelling tools
Software accreditation • “Online” validation: Embedded validation tests in the modelling tool (ESP-r) • Users can access & choose tests • Run them automatically with pre-defined parameters • Results analysis is automatically invoked • Specific results for every test are recovered and saved in a file …
Software accreditation • “Online” validation:Embedded validation tests in the modelling tool (ESP-r) • ESP-r reads a recovery data file • A check is made whether or not the recovered results are within the specified range • Results from the previous released version or another version of the past are also displayed
“Online validation” - Benefits • Developers can check the impact of code modifications • Developers can check compliance with regulations • Frequent checking will confirm the fact that a program continues to be within the specified tolerance bands
“Online validation” - Benefits • User confidence is improved • Users can confirm their installation is correct and check Standards compliance themselves • No need for repeating the construction of the models set out in the validation tests
Summary • EPB Directive is a good first step • Expected to evolve to cover more sustainability issues • Need for a methodology that integrates these issues • Modelling exists and has the capability to deal with these issues • Accreditation process needed • “Online validation” can offer useful benefits