1 / 27

Pedagogy Matters! Teaching Improvement through Community Engagement

Pedagogy Matters! Teaching Improvement through Community Engagement. Innovation 2014, March 2-5, 2014 Anaheim, California Gail O. Mellow, President LaGuardia Community College. Improving College Teaching. The problem? High Dev Ed rates Low graduation rates Low rates of funding per student

aggie
Download Presentation

Pedagogy Matters! Teaching Improvement through Community Engagement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pedagogy Matters!Teaching Improvement through Community Engagement Innovation 2014, March 2-5, 2014 Anaheim, California Gail O. Mellow, President LaGuardia Community College

  2. Improving College Teaching The problem? • High Dev Ed rates • Low graduation rates • Low rates of funding per student • Low % of full time faculty • For the most at-risk college students

  3. Current Strategies Focus? Curricular Structures Student Support Services Policy Changes

  4. Our FOCUS? Teaching – where students and faculty connect Pedagogy accounts for 33% of student success Practical, on the ground Sustainable & Cost Sensitive

  5. If each dev ed professor helped 2 more students per class, pass rates go up 7% 4 more students, 14% Faculty - the under-supported part of the ecosystem

  6. 5 minute silent write --- (Shhhh) Write about a class you taught. Capture the moment of teaching – what you did, how you did it, how the students reacted.

  7. HOW WE GOT HERE A perfect dev ed pedagogy using best faculty? Nope: pedagogies 2. Watched great faculty in action, captured semester of work digitally, derived TAGS using authentic practice in the field, high inter-rater reliability 3. Refined tags to create PATTERNS

  8. Professional Practice Improvement • Reflects Faculty Professional Culture • Embedded in Work • Backed by Evidence • Made Visible • Powered by Social

  9. Faculty iterate to improve practice • ~ Developed Prototype • ~ Engaged Faculty • ~ Use Tags, Deepen Reflection • ~ Create Patterns • ~ Peers & Coaches guide • ~ Digital Library of practice

  10. We Learned… • We can deeply engage faculty • We have a shared language that works across math and English, derived from practice • We know how to use other faculty as peer coaches.

  11. GSCC 1.0 Mathematics Changes over 4 Semesters – Spring ’10 – Fall ‘11 GSCC 1.0 English Changes over 4 Semesters – Spring ’10 – Fall ‘11 Percentage Change Percentage Change Non-GSCC GSCC Non-GSCC GSCC

  12. GSCC 2.0 Math Changes over 2 Semesters – Fall ’12 – Spring‘13 GSCC 2.0 English Changes over 2 Semesters – Fall '12- Spring '13 Percentage Change Percentage Change Non-GSCC Non-GSCC GSCC GSCC

  13. GSCC 2.0 Math & English combined and Adjuncts separated Changes over 2 Semesters – Fall ’12 – Spring ’13 Percentage Change Part-time Full-time

  14. Through a digital environment faculty: • Engaged in weekly reflection • Discovered teaching patterns • Engaged in sustained conversations about pedagogy • with faculty coaches and each other • …and loved it.

  15. Better Teachers, Better Students

  16. Start with Reflection

  17. Show Actual Faculty and Student Work

  18. Use a Common Language of Tags to Categorize Actions

  19. Visualization Seeing Teaching in Action Tags and Patterns motivate and facilitate customized practice improvement

  20. Power with Social

  21. Make resources searchable

  22. Now… YOU Try Tagging

  23. Eng. Prof, Kentucky: Participating in GSCC this year has helped me to be more reflective in every single action. I constantly analyze how each session went… GSCC gave me the tools to think about every minute detail of a classroom. Tagging the lessons helped me to see how each choice; action and event had a purpose and role in the students’ success. I truly believe (and hope) that this reflective action will follow me for the rest of my teaching career. Eng Prof, CO: GSCC is worth far more to me personally and professionally than any single professional development activity in which I have participated in many years. Of course this make sense because GSCC was significantly more substantial than most PD in which we engage. Math Prof, NJ: I think the continual self-evaluation and reflection allowed us to work together to brainstorm improvements and positive tweaks to be more purposeful in our classrooms as opposed to just randomly reaching in the dark for ideas and techniques in HOPE of success. Adjunct Math Prof, Mississippi: Prof 4: Speaking as an adjunct, I also have valued the chance to share my teaching and get ideas from others. I can honestly say that this experience has been a life-line of sorts this year. In a “magic wand” instructional setting, I’d wish for the kind of honest, respectful and professionally challenging discussions we have in Classroom Notebook at weekly staff meetings.

  24. Why is Classroom Notebook embraced and not resisted by faculty? Math Prof, Springfield, MO: My feet have left the ground and there is no turning back! Equipped with knowledge, skills and confidence GSCC has given me, I have new and excitement about teaching. I am ready to go out there and help every single student who will let me. I feel empowered to make a real difference in the lives of my students. Adjunct Eng faculty, TX: I’m invigorated! Thanks for the opportunity to collaborate with others and to learn more about myself as a teacher. The best professional development ever!

  25. Summary • Too few students passing dev ed • Faculty make a difference • Professional development hard to scale, especially for adjunct • We have a cost effective, technology-based scaleable • process that produced encouraging preliminary results

  26. Looking Forward • To Cohort 3: • Another iteration with a larger group of faculty • Focus on 3 large community colleges • Recruit adjuncts to reflect national PT/FT ratio • Questions? • gmellow@lagcc.cuny.edu

More Related