1 / 98

Continuous improvement plan

Continuous improvement plan. Metrics. July 2011. Strategic Directions. Maximize learning Increase collaborative opportunities Build the capacity for continuous improvement Close gaps and reduce inequities Advocate for public education Foster communication and engagement.

xaviere
Download Presentation

Continuous improvement plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Continuous improvement plan Metrics July 2011

  2. Strategic Directions • Maximize learning • Increase collaborative opportunities • Build the capacity for continuous improvement • Close gaps and reduce inequities • Advocate for public education • Foster communication and engagement

  3. Maximize learningGoal 1.1 • Raise Oakland County students’ participation and achievement in pre-K-12 and post-secondary education by meeting the needs of students with diverse backgrounds and educational goals.

  4. Metrics for goal 1.1 • The percent of students who meet standards on pre-K-12 standardized tests that are used county-wide (for example, MEAP, MME, ACT, CFE certification exams, etc.) will improve.

  5. Oakland County reading performance has been flat over the past six years and math results have steadily improved. The Learning Achievement Coalition - Oakland (LAC-O) has goals aimed at improving both literacy and math achievement. MEAP Reading and Math

  6. MEAP Reading – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year. Fall 2010 scores were down in each grade compared to Fall 2009 Reading scores.

  7. MEAP Math – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year. Fall 2010 math scores were up slightly in five grades and down a bit in 4th grade.

  8. MEAP Writing – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year, and have been trending up, especially in 7th grade. Fall 2010 Writing is not directly comparable to previous writing assessments.

  9. MEAP Science – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have been maintaining at the same level.

  10. MEAP Social Studies – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have been level over time.

  11. MME – Oakland County students score above Michigan each year and have trended up in reading, stayed about the same in math, science and writing, and have trended down in social studies.

  12. Oakland County ACT results from 2007 to 2010 have trended up slightly.

  13. Number of students earning technical certificates for each cluster at each of the four Oakland Schools Technical Campuses.

  14. Metrics for goal 1.1 • Four, five and six-year high school graduation rates will improve.

  15. The Oakland County graduation rate has been four to six percentage points above the Michigan rate for the classes of 2007 through the class of 2010.

  16. Oakland County Special Education students’ graduation rate exceeds that of Michigan each year.

  17. Metrics for goal 1.1 • The percent of exiting students planning to enter post-secondary education or training will increase.

  18. About 90% of Oakland County 10th grade students intend to pursue post-high school studies.

  19. In 2009-10 among Oakland County 10thgraders, 37% plan to attend four year colleges and 41% plan postgraduate studies.

  20. Metrics for goal 1.1 • The percent of students who have completed post-secondary education or training five years after high school graduation will increase.

  21. In order to assess this goal, districts will need to conduct follow-up surveys of their graduates five or six years after graduation. In order to create countywide summaries, some parts of their surveys would need to be consistent. If these data are to be collected, each district would have to agree to participate. Example of key information that might help monitor progress on this metric:

  22. Maximize learningGoal 1.2 • Improve the positive, constructive conditions for learning that support diverse students with varying learning styles and cultural backgrounds in all buildings and classrooms in Oakland County.

  23. Metrics for goal 1.2 • The percent of schools that report they have implemented the Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System (MISAAS) performance indicators for positive school culture and climate for learning will increase.

  24. 94% of schools using the School Improvement Framework report they have created an environment conducive to learning.

  25. 95% of schools using the AdvancEdStandards report they have created an environment conducive to learning.

  26. Metrics for goal 1.2 • The percent of students who report that positive, constructive conditions for learning exist in their classrooms will improve.

  27. LAC-O has a goal to improve the relationships between students and teachers. A survey was administered to representative samples of 2,500 8th grade students during the 2009-10 school year. 72% of students reported they had positive relationships with their teachers.

  28. Increase collaborative opportunitiesGoal 2.1 • Expand the technological, educational and resource infrastructure for anywhere, anytime teaching, learning, collaboration, and communication.

  29. Metrics for goal 2.1 • The technical infrastructure availability will be maintained at 99.9% and available to all districts, teachers, students, and staff.

  30. Metrics for goal 2.1 • District participation in the use of Oakland Schools’ hosted resources will increase.

  31. LEA participation in Oakland Schools hosted services is steadily increasing.

  32. Metrics for goal 2.1 • Countywide participation in hosted services will increase cost-savings for LEAs.

  33. Technology Services savings to districts rose from $3.6 million in 2008-09 to $3.9 million in 2009-10.

  34. Increase collaborative opportunitiesGoal 2.2 • Increase opportunities to standardize, centralize or regionalize district operations and instructional services that result in resource efficiencies and overall cost-savings.

  35. Metrics for goal 2.2 • How many districts, offices or staff engaged in standardization, centralization or regionalization?

  36. 1,319 students in 28 LEAs participated in the Oakland Schools Homeless Student Education Program in 2009-10

  37. The Foundation Allowance for the 1,511 students served by Oakland Schools Homeless Program translates into over $13,000,000 in revenue to Oakland districts.

  38. 230 Students in 23 LEAs were served by the Oakland Schools Wraparound Program in 2009-10

  39. The Foundation Allowance for the 117 students served by Oakland County Wraparound Program and 25 students in Pregnant and Parenting Teen Wraparound program translates into over $1,000,000 in revenue to Oakland County districts. Oakland County Wraparound

  40. Oakland Schools’ Truancy Team has handled more than 1,000 cases in each of the last three years and served 1,242 middle school students in its Back to School Program in 2009-10.

  41. The Truancy Team provided $3.8 million of services to Oakland County LEAs in 2009-10. Truancy cases are valued at $2,500 & Back to School at $1,000

  42. The Oakland County JobLink Service Center served over 1,000 youth in 2010.

  43. Partnering for Lasting Upward Success (PLUS) serves in-school youth.

  44. 26 Districts & the Oakland Schools Technical Campuses are using Pearson Inform to analyze data about student achievement. Teachers & administrators logged a total of 29,000 hours in the tool through the first quarter of 2011.

  45. 27 districts and 27 non-public schools participated in the Michigan Green Schools Program in 2010-11

  46. 18 districts participated in the Oakland Human Resources Consortium (OHRC), a consortium of Oakland County school districts dedicated to the recruitment, selection, employment, and professional growth of quality educators and other school district employees.

  47. 26 of the 28 LEAs used Production Printing & Graphics in 2009-10.

  48. Metrics for goal 2.2 • Dollars saved through standardization, centralization and/or regionalization.

  49. In 2009-10, savings and enhancements brought Oakland County districts approximately $73,150,000. SUPPORT SERVICESINSTRUCTIONAL SERVICESDIRECT SERVICES TO STUDENTS, STAFF AND DISTRICTS District Service Report

More Related