1 / 7

RENEWAL 3 2007-2010 Protecting livelihoods and ensuring food security in the time of AIDS monitoring and evaluation of i

RENEWAL 3 2007-2010 Protecting livelihoods and ensuring food security in the time of AIDS monitoring and evaluation of innovations and interventions. Bringing livelihood based social protection for vulnerable children to scale

ailsa
Download Presentation

RENEWAL 3 2007-2010 Protecting livelihoods and ensuring food security in the time of AIDS monitoring and evaluation of i

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RENEWAL 32007-2010Protecting livelihoods and ensuring food security in the time of AIDSmonitoring and evaluation of innovations and interventions Bringing livelihood based social protection for vulnerable children to scale An assessment of the Role and Impact of the Junior Farmer Field and Life School Programme

  2. Study objectives • What has been the impact of the JFFLS programme on providing livelihood based social protection for OVC? • What are the factors that will enable the JFFLS to be scaled up, and are these factors different in the different implementation contexts? • Will it be cost-effective to scale up the JFFLS? • What is the capacity required for scaling up the JFFLS • Will the JFFLS remain gender sensitive at scale? • Key for tomorrow: highlight linkages and synergies between this proposal and research agendas for theme 2 and theme 3 • Key for tomorrow: specify outcome and impact indicators

  3. Expected Outputs • Clarity about the “livelihood based social protection” value of the JFFLS, Deeper understanding of how the JFFLS have contributed building livelihood outcomes and opportunities for OVC • Deeper understanding of the cost-effectiveness of the JFFLS combined with a clear notion on what specific conditions are making the JFFLS more or less cost effective and cost efficient. • Insights into the potential and feasibility for the JFFLS to be scaled up in different countries • Recommendations on what model (s) for scaling up the JFFLS is most sustainable and effective • Deeper understanding of the gender dimension in the JFFLS and projections around the potential for gender sensitiveness at a larger scale • Recommendations for transitions and exit strategies for JFFLS graduates. • Recommendations to strengthen JFFLS monitoring and evaluation systems at outcome and impact level

  4. Methodology • Shape: comparative evaluation • Need to ensure linkages with other ongoing evidence building initiatives (like the UN and Partners’ Alliance Observatory, the Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Programme (RHVP), and VSO-RAISA • Key for tomorrow: include a temporal dimension, starting with a benchmark study on selected sites, followed by several follow-up studies over the lifespan of the project (3 years?) • Key for tomorrow: strengthen the quantitative component

  5. Selection • JFFLS in 10 countries at different stages and with different implementation modalities, partners and entry points • Kenya, Namibia, Malawi, Mozambique, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe • Key for tomorrow: develop criteria by which countries and sites can be selected • Key for tomorrow: design a typology of JFFLS, which will help final analysis, prospective site selection and project design

  6. Other issues to address • Key for tomorrow: multi-disciplinary approach towards the research team is crucial, including the collaborating in institutions • Key for tomorrow: reworking the budget, depending on the counties and sites selected, methodology, research team etc. • Key for tomorrow: discussion around unpicking the challenge around scaling-up context specific interventions. • Key for tomorrow: who does what when to take the concept note to the next level?

  7. Thank you

More Related