160 likes | 341 Views
THE CSA and IMGS. Adapted from work by Celia Roberts Professor of Linguistics at Kings College , London. Cultural and Linguistic Issues Outline. Cause for concern: the ‘under performance’ of minority ethnic candidates Can social theory help us understand these complex factors?
E N D
THE CSA and IMGS Adapted from work by Celia Roberts Professor of Linguistics at Kings College , London
Cultural and Linguistic Issues Outline • Cause for concern: the ‘under performance’ of minority ethnic candidates • Can social theory help us understand these complex factors? • Simulations • Linguistic capital : Examples of problems • Evaluation of failed candidates • Conclusions
Performance of IMGs in CSA • Ethnicity • Pass rates for white candidates 93.6% • Pass rates for ethnic minorities (all) 68% • Country of Graduation • UK 91.6% • EEA 72% • Non European 56.9%
AKT Pass Rates • Ethnicity • White 93% • Asian 74.1% • Black 64.5% • Country Of Graduation • UK 90.9% • EEA 65.2% • IMGs 70.3%
How can we explain these differences? • It isn’t as simple as “command of English” • Self-reporting of first language other than English is surprisingly low • ‘Place of graduation’ packages up many factors all of which may inter-relate
Social Theory • Pierre Bourdieu • Concept of ‘habitus’ • Products of early opportunities and constraints, particularly early socialisation within the family. • Cultural, social and linguistic capital • Those in power have more of this symbolic capital • The ‘fish in water’
Acquiring Linguistic Capital • Overseas graduates least likely to have acquired it • British working class and ethnic minority groups are less likely to be socialised into this form of linguistic capital. • Those whose habitus has prevented them from acquiring the dominant linguistic capital will have ‘less feel for the game’. Its harder to be ‘a fish in water’
‘Double Consciousness’ • Du Bois’ notion of ‘Double Consciousness’ among minority ethnic professionals: compartmentalisation , maintaining distinct cultural spheres • Impact on simulated consulting
Simulations • Additional pressure on those who have relatively less ‘linguistic capital’ and so less ‘feel for the game’ • The ‘double consciousness’ of IMG candidates – where have a double simulation, particularly in those areas of sensitivity and empathy which are crucial to being successful in the CSA. • Those with a ‘feel for the game’ will have the capacity to be ‘hyper –real’ in order to play to the examiner. • It is possible that the CSA puts more pressure on non middle class EM candidates and those who graduated abroad than the old style consulting skills exam of real consultations
Example of lack of linguistic capital • Over-modelling • Result of required ideological shift and lack of support to do so • Recipe –like, formulaic, the ‘bones showing through the flesh’
Data Gathering Examples • Over direct and/or formulaic, very little mitigation or hedging • D: Did you know why we did the X-ray? • Too much direct questioning to elicit expectations/concerns • D:Is there anything particularly worrying you ? (When the patient has already expressed her worries) • No immediate listening to patient’s concerns • P:Ive had heart problems and I was told to come in to-day • D:Just going through your medical records, you have been hypertensive for some time.
Interpersonal Skills Examples • Patient given bad news that may have cancer • And how does that make you feel? • Patient shakes his head and shrugs his shoulders • What do you think about it, are you happy for me to refer you? • I don’t feel happy about anything • What are you not happy about?
Interpersonal Skills Examples • Overly Categorising • this is a high risk pregnancy without mitigating the bad news – (no sunny pairing) • Lets talk about your obesity
Feedback Statements • Does not develop appropriate management plan. (Unsurprising since the development of management plan draws on the whole consultation) • Does not develop shared management plan • Does not identify patients’ agenda/preferences or make use of cues • Does not recognise the challenge • Too Dr-centered • Does not use relevant and understandable explanations • Disorganised and unsystematic gathering of information
Performance Descriptors • Frequent comments about the evidence of weak candidates’ interpersonal skills: • Eye contact • Didn’t ask open questions • Being formulaic and interrogative • Unable to explain effectively • But none of these in isolation account for the way the whole interaction is going. They are often proxies for more subtle features
Conclusions • Not easy to categorise why CSA so challenging for this group • Need to find ways of helping students to develop an appropriate habitus and linguistic capital at the undergraduate and training levels • Develop an analytic language and ways of supporting those on preparation and re-sit courses by working on the detailed ways of realising the positive generic indicators. • Emphasis on listening, relating and a more organic mode of interacting Background the models • Acknowledge the challenges of the double simulation for many minority ethnic group candidates and provide opportunities for plenty of practice.