1 / 23

UNIDROIT International Institute for International Private Law

T hird-party liability for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) services Rome, 22 October 2010 Informal consultation meeting www.unidroit.org. UNIDROIT International Institute for International Private Law. The system. G lobal N avigation S atellite S ystem Not only navigation,

aimon
Download Presentation

UNIDROIT International Institute for International Private Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Third-party liability for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) services Rome, 22 October 2010Informal consultation meetingwww.unidroit.org UNIDROIT International Institute for International Private Law

  2. The system Global Navigation Satellite System Not only navigation, but also: positioning and timing Positioning Navigation Timing

  3. What is GNSS and how it works?Three components: Space segment Ground station Receiver

  4. Spacesegments: Constellations of satellites Currently, there are two operational global systems: • Navstar-GPS of the United States • GLONASS of the Russian Federation in a very near future the GNSS will be enriched by other global constellations: • Galileo of the European Union • Compass-Beidou of China and by regional constellatons: • IRNSS of India • QZSS of Japan

  5. Navstar GPS

  6. GLONASS

  7. GALILEO

  8. Compass-Beidou

  9. QZSS

  10. Space Based Augmentation Systems(SBAS) There are several operational SBAS: WAAS of United States of America EGNOS of European Union MSAS of Japan under development: GAGAN of India Malaysian SBAS NigComsat-1 of Nigeria

  11. Space Based Augmentation Systems(SBAS)

  12. Ground Based Augmentation Systems (GBAS)

  13. INTEROPERABILITY The different constellations and augmentation systems are implemented so as to be interoperable and fully compatible; thus, an international uniform instrument could offer users one single regime, whichever the signal provider.

  14. Applications of GNSS • GNSS has a variety of applications, hence the possible sources of liability are equally varied. Many human activities rely on GNSS on a daily basis, and their number will progressively increase. It would therefore be extremely difficult for GNSS providers to foresee all possible events, each subject to different rules. • An international uniform instrument could offer a single liability regime applicable to all possible fields, also in case of new applications.

  15. Applications of positioning: geodesy

  16. Liability regimes applicable to damage caused by failure of GNSS • GNSS failure or malfunction can provoke errors in the signal, which may be source of accidentsin the different areas of activity that rely on those signals. • These accidents could provoke loss and damages which, in the worst scenario, could even be catastrophic • Legal issues on the third-party liability: applicable law, jurisdiction

  17. International instruments: general regimes on liability None of the existing general international liability regimes applies to third-party liability for accidents caused by GNSS failure or malfunction in transmitting the signal.

  18. International regimes on liability in the transport sector Notwithstanding the existence of a variety of instruments in the transport sector, a number of accidents provoked by GNSS failure or malfunction could fall outside their scope of application.The transport operator would maintain a right of recourse of the transport operator in respect of the GNSS signal provider. These instruments all provide for a limitation of compensation; in the absence of such a limitation for GNSS activities, the plaintiffs might be induced to address the GNSS provider directly in order to obtain higher compensation.The existing regimes can present gaps in protection, and leave open the questions of the subsidiary direct action against the GNSS provider for these “gaps”.

  19. International regimes governing liability for nuclear damage An international instrument on GNSS liability could address the nuclear risk and indicate the relationship of the regime that it creates with the existing instruments in this field.

  20. Regimes governing GNSS liability for applications not covered by the existing instruments An international instrument on GNSS liability could provide a sound and uniform regime for all accidents caused by a failure or malfunction of the system, both for those covered and for those not covered by existing international regimes

  21. Other legal issues on GNSS liability An international instrument could address the issues of: • fraudulent intervention of a third person; • force majeure; • qualification of GNSS signal as a service; • liability in case of failure-malfunction caused by a defective component of the GNSS. An international uniform regime on GNSS liability could facilitate the insurability of GNSS activities. It could also address the issue of open services with respect with GNSS activities and clarify it.

  22. The legal work on GNSS issues undertaken by international organisations An international instrument could be negotiated in cooperation with other international organisations which, in a way or in the other, take interest in GNSS systems, and making use of their expertise.

  23. Thank you!

More Related