140 likes | 327 Views
MYRRHA Injector at UCL. Dirk Vandeplassche Luis Medeiros Romão SCK CEN. MAX International Design Review. Brussels, 12-13 November 2012. Introduction: origin & goal. MYRRHA accelerator risk evaluation → list of critical elements : RFQ in CW mode (4-vane or 4-rod) .. .
E N D
MYRRHA Injectorat UCL Dirk Vandeplassche Luis Medeiros Romão SCKCEN MAX International Design Review Brussels, 12-13 November 2012 Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012
Introduction: origin & goal Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • MYRRHA acceleratorriskevaluation → list of criticalelements: • RFQ in CW mode (4-vane or 4-rod) • ... • OECD review (MIRT, 2009) → request to SCK•CEN of showing relevant acceleratoractivity • need for reliability test platform • need for innovation platform
Test platformoverview to belocatedat the Centre de Ressources du Cyclotron, UCL Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012
Components RFQ@UCL isalso an "accelerator consortium test platform" Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • design & construction modalities • collaborative • MAX Collaboration • research institutes: IPNO, LPSC, IAP, CRC, Soleil • industries: Pantechnik, NTG, Cosylab, IBA, ... • research consultants (MoU): Spiral2, CERN, ... • private consultants: Linac Dynamics, ... • strong MAX involvement: WP1 and WP2 partners • CNRS • CEA • IAP • KULAK • SCK•CEN
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 ECR proton source ← Pantechnik (Bayeux, France)
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 LEBT ← IPNO, benchmarking & erroranalysis by Linac Dynamics, realisation and commissioning by LPSC, controls by Cosylab
Benchmarking Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 RFQ ← IAP Frankfurt, benchmarking (3D fields) by KULAK and Linac Dynamics, manufacturing by NTG, tuningat IAP
Benchmarking Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Diagnostics: lowenergy, highcurrent • beamcurrent • interceptive: FC • non-interceptive: BCT • beam position • beam profiles • emittances • longitudinal bunchproperties • likely to bebased on existing items • Spiral2 • Linac4
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Power RF for RFQ: 176.1 MHz, 160 kW CW • TH781 tetrodebased final amplifier • SS amplifier, Soleil technology • efficiency • modularity for reliability
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Controls • main target: berepresentative of full-size system • distant • 3-tier • EPICS • lowlevelwithPLC's (slow) + FPGA cards in crates (fast) • willinclude timing • Cosylab for architecture and realisation • test platform! • LLRF • discussion with IPNO ongoing • looking for elegantintegration
Components Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • Services: • 750 kVA • profitingfrom CRC infrastructure • elec cabinets withremote diagnostics and controls • PLC-controlledcooling system • deionized water loop • chilled and temperaturestabilizeddeinonized water loop • air coolingloop • integratedindustrialprocurement • test case for integration in EPICS system
Conclusion Dirk Vandeplassche, MAX International Design Review, Brussels, 12-13 November, 2012 • setup at UCL/CRC has a highpotential as a test platform: • 4-rod CW RFQ evaluation • beamcharacterisation • long reliabilityruns • innovation • target date "first beam end of 2014" isstillachievable • possible extension with CH cavities (IAP) • SC-CH?