1 / 26

ERASMUS INFORMAL MEETING INTENSIVE PROGRAMMES 22-23 September 2011 Athens-Greece

ERASMUS INFORMAL MEETING INTENSIVE PROGRAMMES 22-23 September 2011 Athens-Greece IP impact : how to measure it ?. Elina Mavrogiorgou, IKY-Hellenic National L.L.P. Agency / Erasmus. Why IP are necessary at the EU level?. Why they are an appropriate choice?

ainsley-webb
Download Presentation

ERASMUS INFORMAL MEETING INTENSIVE PROGRAMMES 22-23 September 2011 Athens-Greece

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERASMUS INFORMAL MEETING INTENSIVE PROGRAMMES 22-23 September 2011 Athens-Greece IP impact : how to measure it ? Elina Mavrogiorgou, IKY-Hellenic National L.L.P. Agency /Erasmus

  2. Why IP are necessary at the EU level? Why they are an appropriate choice? Which are the general / specific objectives related to ERASMUS IP ?

  3. General objectives for LLP foster interchange, cooperation and mobility between education and training systems within the Community so that they become a world quality reference

  4. Specific objectives for LLP -contribute to the development of quality Lifelong Learning -promote high performance, innovation and a European dimension in systems and practices in the field -support the realization of a European area for Lifelong Learning -improve the quality, attractiveness and accessibility of the opportunities for Lifelong Learning available with Member States

  5. Specific objectives for LLP (2) -reinforce the contribution of Lifelong Learning to social cohesion, active citizenship, intercultural dialogue, gender equality, personal fulfillment -promote creativity, competitiveness, employability and the growth of an entrepreneurial spirit -contribute to participation of people regardless their socio-economic background -promote language learning and linguistic diversity ‘

  6. Specific objectives for LLP (3) Support the development of innovative ICT-based content, services, pedagogies and practices creating a sense of European citizenship, encouraging tolerance and respect for people and cultures

  7. ERASMUS operational objectives -Improve the quality and increase the volume of students and teaching staff mobility throughout Europe -Improve the quality and increase the volume of multilateral cooperation between HEI in Europe -Improve the quality and increase the volume of cooperation between higher education institutions and enterprises -facilitate the development of innovative practices in education and training at tertiary level and their transfer, including from one participating country to others -Support the development of innovative ICT-based content, services, pedagogies and practice for lifelong learning

  8. Erasmus policy Curricular reform: competence based learning, flexible learning paths, recognition of qualifications and competences New skills for new jobs initiative: get the right skills and competences : make the best possible predictions about what skills will be needed in the future

  9. IP Impact definition 3 components Students – Teachers - Institutions Main objectives: Mobility, innovation, creativity, ICT, recognition, multinational cooperation, intercultural dialogue, personal fulfillment, employability, language learning, social inclusion In the long term: comparability and transparency of qualifications Development of a common scientific language Curricular reform Providing education more relevant to the outside world

  10. Methods used for monitoring IP -Interviews -Discussion with the coordinator -Observation (attending courses) -Group discussion with the IP participants -Send questionnaire before the visit

  11. Evaluation of the final report -6 NA use external experts TOOLS USED: -Quality assessment sheet based on EACEA example -Check list -Comparison of application and final report (not always the case) -External expert used for an overall judgment

  12. IP enhance the quality of ERASMUS mobility? Establish + strengthen networks of cooperation Possibility to be mobile for more students, who cannot participate in a standard ERASMUS mobility

  13. IP quality impact on Institutional level -Mobility promotion tool -New level of trust between the partner institutions -international team work-improvement of teaching methods, learn from students/learn from each other -a kick-off for further cooperation, research projects, networks, joint degrees -Joint master programs -CD projects -Erasmus Mundus Masters -EU Canada projects -FP7 projects

  14. IP inclusion to the curricula Data collected on the final report level Best practice: -Special dissemination questionnaire, additional to the final report -Excel sheet: must be handed in with the Final report IP is in some cases included to the curriculum as an elective course In one case, an IP will be implemented in the new English Module of the coordinating HEI

  15. Recognition -PhD students Certificate,recognized as an elective course Not always the same number of ECTS (usually 5 ECTS /differences between partner institutions) Even if the coordinating Institution recognizes the IP course, it is not always the case for the partner institutions

  16. IP after the 3 year funding -followup only during monitoring or systems checks -Asking best practice IP coordinators at a personal level

  17. IP duration 3-5 years Should bear in mind that there are IP for 15 years! (same partnership-different topic) Stronger emphasis should be given to dissemination Extension of the financing period but cutting funds down -Some NA support the idea -Could reduce the number of traveling IP But: the majority not in favor: difficult to find additional funding

  18. Information on IP quality and Impact given by coordinators IP allow teachers to take risks, to try something new Share of best practices -more ideas, creativity, links between partners Improvement of the quality: comparison between different educational systems/ teaching methods/learning content Mix theory + workshops work in a multinational environment : Working with an international group of students ICT used Lab exercises / Field work-in wild nature Working on real cases Faster way of gaining knowledge Developing soft skills Innovation: important component -Spin-offs : articles/publications/research projects

  19. Positive impact on teaching methods IP make the teachers be more open minded Teaching improved/enriched New ideas Encourage further cooperation Creative teaching methods

  20. Benefits for teachers -Teaching staff improves professional teaching experience –exchange of ideas -teaching in a foreign languageadds prestige -Discuss the latest research results/on state of art subjects in their field -Self assessment of teaching methods -Work with international groups -International recognition

  21. Benefits for students Strong impact on young researchers Learn something they can’t in their university, but needed for their research They learn a lot : about new approaches on their subject, about linked subjects, new topics, latest research Improved language skills Professionalism Work intensively and in depth Creative thinking Building confidence/networking Many opportunities to study abroad after the IP Learn how to work in a group of people coming from different cultures-overcoming stereotypes

  22. Evaluation sheets: a good tool? -Useful tool for the IP improvement -Specific questionnaires are also needed (prepared by the IP partnership) Suggestion: impact study done both at national and European level But: Coordinators feel some of the questions are not relevant or cannot be answered right after the IP -Some coordinators adapt the evaluation sheet to their specific needs. Evaluation tool on line: good idea (who is going to organize it?)

  23. Platform for IP coordinators ? IP portal/platform: link the coordinators-exchange of experience Good idea (coordinators’ reaction very positive) but face to face contact is also very important -Needs good organization -Information should be transferred directly from the LLP link: administrator of the platform is needed, coordinators don’t have the time for that. -Some IP have their own internet platforms or are part of subject related networks Proposal:ADAM/EST data base

  24. Suggestions on the IP impact Application forms-published earlier:more time for partnerships to be prepared -Defining clearly the learning outcomes -Teachers should stay minimum 3 days -Contact seminars for coordinators -Thematic meetings for coordinators -Informal meetings -Impact study done both at national and European level

  25. How innovative are IP? “An IP is as innovative as are its partners” Need for a good definition for “innovative” One teaching method may be standard in one area, but innovative in some other IP seen as “think tanks” “Excellence character component” : how it can be highlighted more explicitly?

  26. Need for a long term strategy? -A sustainable strategy should be obligatory? -At least ensure that the new content created can become a part of the teaching program -Small IP can be used as a tool to enhance mobility -Minimum requirements for outputs and dissemination strategy? -Dissemination activities: how can they be strengthen?

More Related