200 likes | 384 Views
IgG Detection Using Anti- IgG Conjugated Microparticles. By Sarah Leung and Anbar Najam. Methods. Conjugated anti-IgG antibodies to 0.92 um microparticles 33% microparticle surface coverage with IgG 0.02% microparticle concentration in solution. Methods.
E N D
IgG Detection Using Anti-IgG Conjugated Microparticles By Sarah Leung and AnbarNajam
Methods • Conjugated anti-IgG antibodies to 0.92 um microparticles • 33% microparticle surface coverage with IgG • 0.02% microparticle concentration in solution
Methods • Positioned a 180 degree optical reflection probe directly above samples for detection on a two-well slide
Results • 5*10-11 g/mL to 5*10-6 g/mLIgG serial dilutions
Results • 5*10-15 g/mL to 5*10-6 g/mL IgG serial dilutions
Discussion • Results lacked evidence of any trends between antigen concentration and light scattering intensity • Possible explanations: • Coagulation of microparticles • High scattering due to 180 degree detection • Conjugation of antibody, rather than antigen, to microparticles
Next Experiment • Added TWEEN 80 to existing 0.92 um microparticle solution and evaluate 180 degree vs. 45 degree light scattering detection Vs. 180 degrees 45 degrees
Results 5*10-14 g/mL to 5*10-6 g/mL IgG serial dilutions
Results 5*10-14 g/mL to 5*10-6 g/mL IgG serial dilutions
Discussion • 180 degree results lacked evidence of any trends between antigen concentration and light scattering intensity • With 45 degree probe, we found a detection limit of 10-6 g/ml
Contact Angle Measurements of Anti-E. Coli and Anti-E. Coli Conjugated Microparticles on Superhydrophobic Surface
Methods • Conjugated anti-E. coli antibodies to 0.92 um microparticles • 33% microparticle surface coverage with anti-E. coli • 0.02% microparticle concentration in solution
Methods • Dispensed 10 ul droplet on to superhydrophobic surface. • Measured contact angle over 10 minutes • Droplets: • Deionized Water • Anti-E. coli -Conc. 5*10-7 • Anti-E. coli conjugated to microparticles
Results Anti-E. coli -Conc. 5*10-7
Discussion • Results oscillate and do not form a smooth curve. • Possible explanations: • Surface contamination • Droplet movement, vibration. • Position of droplet. • Size of droplet
Next Experiment Decrease the volume of the droplet from 10 ul to 3 ul for a more spherical shape.
Results Deionized Water
Future Work Minimize the oscillations. Change the position of the surface. Determine an efficient way to dispense 3ul droplet on to superhydrophobic surface
Acknowledgement s • UA/NASA Space Grant • Dr. Jeong-Yeol Yoon • Lab group: Tremaine B. Powell, Jin-Hee Han, Brian C. Heinze, Phat L. Tran, Jennine N. Chesler, Dr. Keesung Kim, and Dr. Song