1 / 36

Laurie Forrester, PharmD April 19, 2006

Current Status and Future Outlook for Long Term Care Under Medicare Part D. Laurie Forrester, PharmD April 19, 2006. A Presentation for the Medicaid Health Plans of America. Don’t let this happen to you!. Today’s Agenda. Long term care (LTC) environment Medicare D in LTC

akamu
Download Presentation

Laurie Forrester, PharmD April 19, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Current Status and Future Outlook for Long Term Care Under Medicare Part D Laurie Forrester, PharmD April 19, 2006 A Presentation for the Medicaid Health Plans of America

  2. Don’t let this happen to you!

  3. Today’s Agenda • Long term care (LTC) environment • Medicare D in LTC • The first 100 days: implementation challenges • What lies ahead • 2007 strategic considerations • Future Vision

  4. Long Term Care Environment

  5. Long-Term Care Market Total 2.9 million beds ALF & Alternate Care 1.2 M beds LTC SNF 1.7 M beds

  6. Institutional Pharmacy: Annual Expenditures LTC spend is more than double the ALF spend $ in billions Source: IMS data, company reports, and Warburg Dillon Read LLC estimates

  7. Influencing Factors: ALFs vs SNFs Assisted Living Facilities - Growing Market • ALFs are generally unregulated by the states • Increasing level of services provided by ALFs • Elders with higher incomes choose ALFs Skilled Nursing Facilities - Flat Market • SNFs are highly regulated at the state and federal level • CMS defined as INSTITUTIONALIZED • Up to 75% of SNF residents will be Dual Eligible beneficiaries - low paying/ 2.5 year stays/ high # of co-morbid conditions

  8. PDP Enrollment: What’s Known at This Point…

  9. Institutional Care Settings CMS requires adequate LTC Pharmacy Network coverage for all institutional care facilities: • Skilled Nursing Facilities • Assisted Living Facilities (wavier beds only) • Correctional Facilities • Mental Health/ Mental Retardation • Group Homes • Hospice

  10. Influencing Factors: ALFs vs SNFs • Medicare Part D impacted both but SNF residents qualify for Special Enrollment Period (SEP) and ALFs do NOT • Relatively few Low Income Subsidy or Dual Eligible in the ALFs; most ALF residents are full premium and co-pay • Residents in both may have Medicare Part B and Part Dbut the coverage rules are different: • ALF residents have infusion therapy and nebulized medications covered under Part B • In the SNF, infusion therapy and nebulized meds are covered under Part D

  11. LTC Residents Average LTC resident is: • Female > Male • 83 years old • 6 or more comorbidities • On 10 scheduled meds •  renal & liver function,  ADRs • Seen by Physician ~ every 1.3 mo. • Average stay 2 ½ years Continuity of care and consistency of drug regimen is critical. American Society of Consultant Pharmacists 2004 American Medical Directors Association 2004

  12. LTC Pharmacy: CMS Service and Performance Standards • Services Offered by: • Comprehensive Inventory of LTC Meds • Pharmacy Ops and Rx Orders –DUR & • Cost Containment • Special Packaging • I.V. meds and I.V. nutritional therapies • Compounding Alternative Formulations • Pharmacists and nurses available • 24 hrs/ day, 365 days/ year • Delivery service available 24 hrs/ day • Emergency Boxes ( E-kits) • E-kit Log Books • Miscellaneous Reports & Forms Retail           Hospital          +/- LTC           CMS Long Term Care Guidance. March 16, 2005

  13. LTC Pharmacy: Additional Standard Service and Performance Offerings • Services Offered by: • Consultant Pharmacists to provide on-site chart review (DRR), inspections and written reports as required by law OBRA 90 • Inservice and educational programs • Participation on facility Quality Assurance & Case Management teams • Medicare Part A “Senior Safe” Formulary development and management for care assurance and cost containment Retail     Hospital   +/-  LTC     LTC Pharmacy Alliance 2005

  14. LTC Pharmacy Performance & Service Criteria • CMS performance and service criteria are minimum requirements for a network LTC pharmacy. • Payment to LTC pharmacies under Part D only covers drug ingredient costs and dispensing fees as defined in the final regulations (42 CFR § 423.100). • The LTC service elements, except for drug cost, are legitimate costs to reflect in the dispensing fee. • KEY POINT • Specialized drug administration services provided after drugs are dispensed and delivered from the LTC pharmacy, are NOT covered by the Part D benefit; • This means IV pumps and supplies are NOT paid for by Part D and not covered under Part B the LTC Pharmacy or SNF must pay; may be covered by some state Medicaid wrap-around CMS Long Term Care Guidance. March 16, 2005

  15. LTC Pharmacy Chains • Top 3 LTC Pharmacy Providers service nearly 2/3 of market • Smaller Pharmacies are supplied by LTC GPOs • - MHA, GeriMed, Innovatix Source: IMS and Company web-sites

  16. PDPs and LTC Pharmacy Network Strategies to Effectively build a LTC Pharmacy Network • Look to the 3 large chains and 3 LTC GPOs Strategies to build an Effective LTC Pharmacy Network, especially MAPDs and SNPs Look to LTC Pharmacy Providers that can assist with: • Formulary compliance communications • Provider education • Call enters and E-fax capabilities • Implement Blanket Authorization • Utilize LTC Consultant Pharmacist but monitor patient outcomes

  17. The First 100 Days: Implementation Challenges

  18. Not without problems…..

  19. January 1 – D-Day! - LTC Experience • Week 1: E1 queries returning info on 30-50% • Means 50% to 70% of Rxs PENDING • DE claims returning with deductibles and co-pays • PDPs/ MAPDs not recognizing • Beneficiary or Pharmacy • WellPoint emergency POS enrollment used broadly • Retail: some duals leaving pharmacy without meds • LTC: all meds must be delivered; pharmacy on the hook financially Used with permission PharMerica & Beverly, 2006

  20. Inquiry Volumes to E1 System Source: Testimony of CMS Administrator McClellan to the Senate Finance Committee, February 8, 2006.

  21. February 28th - 60 Days • E1 queries responses up to about 90% to 95% • Means 5% - 10% of Rxs Pending • Most state Medicaids covering excluded meds, some non-formulary, and duals without an identifiable plan so 5% of these paid • Some Plans not providing CMS recommended transition (14 to 30 days) and Part D (B) meds coverage for SNFs • Plans inconsistent in use of patient locator codes (identifying the LTC) results in inappropriately charged deductibles, co-pays and B/D coverage • LTC pharmacies still dispensing some meds with still no identified payor • Blende

  22. April 10th- 100 Days • CMS recommended initial transition period over March 31st • CMS reiterated to continue 30 day transition period • E1 queries responses still about 90% to 95% • 6 states identified as continuing coverage for excluded meds, some non-formulary, & duals without identifiable plan • Pharmacies completing Prior Authorization and Appeal forms for physicians – sending to MDs for additional information and signature • 15% of forms completed and submitted by physicians • Rather are defaulting to formulary meds • Physician’s complaint – even if sub-optimal therapy they get no reimbursement for management of pharmacotherapy

  23. Med D Formularies Full impact of formularies not yet known; what we know now: • Some entire classes of drugs require Prior Authorization (PA) or other administrative burden • E.g. Influenza, Alzheimer's, & injectable meds • IN LTC, Physician and medical records separated • PDPs/ MAPDs all differ in processes, notices & forms • Some formularies “promote” less expensive but potentially inappropriate generic or “Beers List” meds

  24. Rebates To LTC Pharmacies • CMS issued Q&A in November 2005 • Felt rebates to LTC pharmacies contrary to spirit of Medicare law requiring management of formularies by plans • Driving to higher tiered products because of rebates could raise overall price of Rx benefit • Model is to report ALL price concessions in plans’ bid, including LTC • Referred to concern about anti-kickback statute • Issue likely to be considered further in 2006 Source: CMS Part D Q&A #6326 & 6688 on CMS/ rebates/ LTC pharmacies, Nov. 28, 2005 & Feb. 13, 2006; LTCPA to CMS on rebate disclosure, Dec. 5, 2005.

  25. Implementation Challenges in LTC • Cleaning up the duals mess pronto • Payer/ state/ CMS reconciliations will take months • Preparing for the next “tsunamis” • Coverage gap for non-duals – receiving payment • Managing operational effects of lock-in • Does not apply to LTC due to SEPs but does allpy to ALF • LTC pharmacy and home infusion B vs D – coverage mess to figure out • For MAPDs/ SNPs: mastering risk adjustment before 2007

  26. What Lies Ahead

  27. 2007 to USP Formulary Model : LTC Implications • Restructures therapeutic category and classes; total number changed from 146 to 133 (-13) • Two “anti-dementia” classes combined into one- could restrict access to appropriate meds • Two classes have two different MOAs • Expansion of GI agents to ensure access to medications with differing MOAs

  28. 2007 Strategic Considerations - LTC • Sponsors will be facing end of aggregate reinsurance • Sponsors will be ratcheting-up control mechanisms due to decreased risk share • Step Therapy, Prior Authorization, Quantity Limits, Strict Formularies • Will evidence-based practices dictate preferred drugs or tier placement in a therapeutic class? • Administrative burden on MDs for PAs & Appeals;  role for LTC pharmacies limited by legislation

  29. LTC Resident Part D Assistance Act • Sponsored by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) • Provides additional protections for LTC beneficiaries • Requires dedicated phone line at plans for LTC staff • Permits “facilitated” enrollment into plans rather than auto-assignment • Reimburses LTC facilities for costs incurred for prescription coverage, enrollment assistance, and appeals process

  30. Convergence of Health PoliciesCreate Opportunities for MA- SNPs Lock-In Exemptions • Special Needs Plans: • Sub-set or MA PDs • Chronic Care • Dual Eligibles • Institutionalized SNPs Part D Auto-Enroll of Duals Medicaid- Managed Care Risk Adjustment

  31. 2007 Strategic Considerations - Plans • Movement into Special Needs Plans (SNPs) • Plans getting 100% Risk Adjustment will be marketing to increase enrollment • SNP-eligibles – have no lock-out period, can change plans anytime • Medicaid reforms will move A/B/D populations to mandatory managed care plans; • Managed LTC may become popular

  32. Looking Forward for Plans • Market Pressures • “Roadkill” and consolidation inevitable • Moving system toward “value-based” program • Better data on outcomes and quality • Pay for performance -- quality indicators • Integrating true disease management and MTMP • Plan education to direct prescriber decision-making • Required investment in e-prescribing

  33. Conclusions • Tectonic shift and major challenges for LTC and PBMs in particular • Trends to continue, intensify in 2007 • “Road-kill” expected in the Plan market as plans begins to consolidate even as late entrants join • Unexpected “road-kill” possible in the LTC Pharmacy market – depending on payments for non-covered meds • Migration from PDPs  MA-PDs  SNPs for many duals • LTC facility providers interested in implementing LTC-SNP model as demonstrated by Evercare; probable 2008 before plans in place

  34. How to Reach Us Gorman Health Group, LLC Washington, DC Headquarters (202) 364-8283 Laurie P. Forrester, PharmD 214-987-2002 lforrester@gormanhealthgroup.com

  35. Competitive Landscape:PDPs 2006

  36. Impact of Dual Assignments on PDPs Source: Lehman Brothers and GHG Analysis, September 2005.

More Related