1 / 7

Disciplinary Commons Portfolio Presentation

Disciplinary Commons Portfolio Presentation. Quintin. Are we teaching the right thing?. Artefact – course materials Ada Standard imperative offering Contexts: bespoke graphical, JEWL, text i/o Commentary Wrong language – hard to simplify for beginner

akando
Download Presentation

Disciplinary Commons Portfolio Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Disciplinary CommonsPortfolio Presentation Quintin CS – 1P

  2. Are we teaching the right thing? • Artefact – course materials • Ada • Standard imperative offering • Contexts: bespoke graphical, JEWL, text i/o • Commentary • Wrong language – hard to simplify for beginner • type system in particular a major headache • Too hung up on formatted textual i/o • several major exercises • Jury out on imperative vs. OO • I’m wondering what would persuade me? CS – 1P

  3. L L L L L L L a b s T u t s T u t s hand-in hand-back Are we using the right methods? • Artefacts – course handbook, focus group transcripts and questionnaires • Course sessions • Lectures with handsets, tutorials & labs • All rated highly by students • Linkage/feedback all wrong CS – 1P

  4. Right methods…? • Beginners and experienced together… • good/bad? Evidence - silent tutorials? • should we be streaming? • No freedom to do their own thing • everything for course is prescribed • surely wrong! • flies in anecdotal face of many of our recollections of learning to program CS – 1P

  5. Are we assessing appropriately? • Assessment components • 2 lab exams, 1 class test, 1 degree exam • no ongoing weekly/fortnightly summative assessment • Believed to be an acceptable assessment, except • formative exercises not congruent with these CS – 1P

  6. Can we be sure students are getting it? • Artefact • Annotated exam scripts, exercise submissions etc • Analysis • Still not sure what to make of all the data • Anecdotally • Many students fail • Those who are the strongest self-learners make it CS – 1P

  7. prep for lab session L a b s LGT L LGT L p&p exercises Changes for next time • Play and creativity emphasised • New language • New contexts • free programming project (thanks Durham) • Streaming of small group teaching (after first ¼) • Align formative & summative assessments • Feedback cycles maximised • entirely new structures - Thank you Sally and all for an inspirational experience CS – 1P

More Related