1 / 38

Poincare Sections and the Uniqueness of ODE Solutions: A Study on Iterated Maps

This study explores the relationship between iterated maps and ordinary differential equations (ODEs), specifically focusing on the existence of Poincare maps. Examples of reduction to 1-D maps and the behavior of dissipative systems are examined. The study also discusses the universality of chaotic maps and the stability of attractor cycles.

akilian
Download Presentation

Poincare Sections and the Uniqueness of ODE Solutions: A Study on Iterated Maps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Iterated Map • Poincare sections: ODEs → Map • Maps by themselves. • 1-D map: xn+1 = f(xn) • Map → ODEs ???

  2. Poincare Sections Uniqueness of solutions of ODEs → existence of Poincare map Example of Reduction to 1-D map:

  3. Another example: Dissipative system: IC cluster → 0 volume Poincare section of 3-D system Directions with M<<1 ( λ<<0 ) quickly contract. If system is sufficiently dissipative: IC cluster → curve → 1-D map

  4. Essentially 1-D system: Diode circuit High Q: 2-D ? Low Q: 1-D

  5. Effectively 1-D System: Pendulum D = 2/3, b = 1, F = 2.048

  6. 1-D Iterated Map Maps have greater range of dynamical behavior than their ODE counterparts Logistic map: Fixed point: Logistic map: Linear stability analysis:

  7. Bifurcations: Period Doubling Route to Chaos

  8. 2-cycle: → Same stability at x1* and x2* S,U,S At bifurcation point ( A1 = 3 ) : x* = x1* = x2* In general  But not vice versa

  9. (Un)stable f(x*)  (Un)stable f(n)(x*) Let xi(n)* be the ith fixed point of an n-cycle, then (Ex.5.4-4) for i = 1, …, n Prime period of a fixed point = smallest n  x* = f(n)(x*) Ex 5.4-6

  10. f(n): f(2n): f(n) > -1 f(n) = -1 f(n) < -1 S S S, U, S

  11. Lyapunov Exponents • Chaos: • Divergence of nearby trajectories. • x ~ exp(λt) n = Mn-1 1 with λ>0 & |M|>1 • Dissipative system: ergodic Consider 2 neighboring points on a chaotic attractor: n large, ε→ 0 xi on same trajectory Best choice of n: dn ~ X/2 An 1-D map is chaotic if λ > 0

  12. Universality: The U Sequence • Unimodal map: • Piecewise C(1) function of [0,1] into itself with a single maximum at the critical point xc. • Monotonic otherwise. • By convention, f(0) = f(1) = 0 and xc = 0.5. Shift + scale to unimodal Non-unimodal

  13. Metropolis, Stein & Stein’s U-Sequence Reprinted in P.Cvitanovic, “Universality in Chaos”, 2nd ed., Adam Hilger (84,89) • Supercycle of period n: • x1 = f(xc) x2 = f(x1) … xn-1 = f(xn-2) xc = f(xn-1) • Symbol (kneading) sequence: xi > xc → R, xi < xc → L → Supercycles are most stable

  14. λ = .9895107

  15. U-sequences beyond periodic doubling accumulation point ( A ~ 3.5699… for logistic map ) are in windows within chaotic regime. • Universality. • Non-uniqueness: there are other sequences not involving xc. (cf. Singer’s theorem ) • Comparison with experiments: favorable. • Exceptions: • oscillating chemical reactions • varactor diode circuit • Gaussian map Ex. 5.5-2

  16. Some Generalizations • Single minimum: f(x) = 1 – Ax(1-x) • Ex. 5.5-3 • Scaling: f(x) = Bx(b-x) • u = x/b

  17. Schwarzian derivative Introduced originally for complex analysis • Sf = 0 if f = (az+b)/(cz+d) = linear fractional transform. • Sf < 0, Sg < 0 → S(f。g) < 0 • Sf < 0 → Sf(n) < 0. • Sf < 0 restricts existence of inflection points: • Schwarzian min-max principle: Sf < 0 → • f has no positive local minimum or negative local maximum. Pf: f(x*) is min → f(x*) = 0 & f(x*) > 0  Sf < 0 → f(x*) < 0 A unimodal map can have an infinite series of pitchfork bifurcations only if Sf < 0

  18. f < 0, f > 0 , f < 0 f < 0 f > 0, f < 0, f > 0 f > 0 Allowed: Pichfork bifurcation

  19. Singer’s Theorem Let Dom(f)  Ran(f) and Sf < 0, then n critical points → at most n+2 attracting cycles Proof: D.Gulick, “Encounters with Chaos”, McGraw Hill (92) or, R.L.Devaney, “ An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems”, Benjamin (86)…Theorem 11.4. Corollary: unimodal map has at most 3 stable cycles ( usually only 1 with basin almost everywhere )

  20. Sarkovskii’s Theorem Let f(x,A)  C0. If f has a prime period m at A0, then f(x,A0) has period n to the right of m in the following sequence: 3→5→7→ … → 2×3 → 2×5 → … → 22×3 → 22×5 → … … → 23 → 22 → 2 → 1 { 20(2n+1) } → { 21(2n+1) } → { 22(2n+1) } → … → { 2n ↓ } Note: Multiple appearances not counted. Only stable cycles computable. Pf: R.L.Devaney, “ An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems”, Benjamin (86) Period 3 → all periods Logistic map: A = 3.8319…. Li & Yorke, “ Period 3 implies Chaos? ” Logistic map: 1→2→4→ … Chaos → ( windows …→7→5→3 )

  21. First 8 images of xc. B.D.: only 10 points plotted. Organization of Chaos Logistic map: bifurcation • Heavy lines: images of xc since f’(xc) = 0. • If xc is within basin of attractor: • xmax = f(xc) xmin = f(2)(xc) • f(n)(xc): boundaries of interior bands • windows: merging of images of xc. • At Ac, images of xc = supercycle. • Sarkovskii’s sequence Misiureweiz point: Ex 5.5-7

  22. Feigenbaum Universality Details in Appendices F & H. See operator approach in H.G.Schuster, “Deterministic Chaos” Distance from xc to its nearest neighbor (at half-way) in the 2n supercycle: Feigenbaum α:

  23. Existence of α implies that of a universal function g  Proof: Define  Ansatz: →

  24. Calculating α & g Universality classes of maps are determined by the form of g(y→0). Different class, different α Quadratic class: Maximum at y = 0 with  y Constant term: y2 term:  Better values obtained by considering higher order terms.

  25. Tent ( Triangle ) Map Piecewise linear r Fixed points x* < ½ : Fixed points x* > ½ :

  26. 1  r > ½ : chaotic Ex 5.7-3: <λ> > 0 f(4) All fixed points of all the f(n)s are unstable. No period-doubling route 1 unstable f.p. → 2 stable f.p.’s. Period-doubling requires f  C1

  27. Shift Maps & Symbolic Dynamics Decimal shift map: x mod[1] = x (mod 1) = mod(x,1) = fractional part of x xn is left-shifted by 1 digit to give xn+1. x0 Q  fixed point / periodic cycle. x0 = 3/8 → x* = 0 x0 = 22/70 → 6-cycle x0 irrational  trajectory ergodic There’re infinitely many A numbers between any two B numbers ( A,B = rat/irrat )  Sensitive to I.C. Chaotic: <λ> > 0 R is uncountably infinite Q is countably infinite → measure 0 Computer: no irrat numbers

  28. Bernoulli Shift Fractional binary numbers: (7/8)10 = (0.875000)10 = (0.111000)2 .5 + .25 + .125 = .875 Bernoulli Shift Ex. 5.8-1: <λ> = ln 2 Irrational number : digits = randomn sequence Symbolic dynamics C.f. U-sequence Ref: Devaney

  29. Logistic Map (A = 4) ~ Bernoulli Shift <λ> = ln2 Use as random number generator

  30. The Gaussian Map f  C1.  period-doubling sequence Inflection points at → |f|<< 1 for large |x| → stable fixed point at –x << -1 → period-halving sequence ( bubbling ) U-seq violated: diode, osc chem reaction… b = 7.5, x0 = 0

  31. b = 7.5, x0 = 0 b = 4, x0 = 0 b = 7.5, x0 = 0.7 3 fixed points Another violation of U-seq: Antimonotonicity ~ dimple near xc -- e.g., Diode.

  32. 2-D Maps Henon Map: C > 0; x,y  R 3-term recurrence: Invertible: For 0 <|B|< 1, y-spread → 0 B = 0.3, C = 1 f(sq) = dots

  33. Bifurcation diagrams (B = 0.3) : {x0,y0} = {0,0.5} {x0,y0} = {0.5,0.5} combined 2 attractors → hysteresis crisis

  34. Smale Horseshoe Map Ref: D.Gulick, “Encounters with Chaos”, McGraw Hill (92) T = [0,1]  [0,1] B, E = semi-circles S = T∪B∪E • Shrinks vertically by a < 1/3. • Expands horizontally by b = 3. • Reshape M(B) & M(E) into semicircles. • Fold to fit back in S ( boundaries of M(D) = semicircles ) 

  35. M(n)(S) = 2n-1 connected horseshoes each of width ~ an. • M has a unique fixed point p in B to which iterates of all points in B & E converge. • All points in S migrate either to p or C+, where = intersect of nested sequence of strips Cijk… i,j,k,… = 0,1 vCijk…  vCi M(v)Cj M(2)(v)Ck… v ~ z = ˙ijk…Forward sequence Cantor set

  36. Inverse mapping: Vi = M(Ci) M(-1)(Vi) = Ci v Vi j = M2(Ci j)  M(-1)(v) M(Ci j) Cj M(-2)(v)Ci j  Ci v ~ z = ij˙ backward sequence

  37. h ←→ h-1 → h-1 h ← z-2˙z-1 z0˙z1 ˙z0 z-2z-1˙ z-1˙ ˙z0z1 Vij → ij˙ Cij → ˙ij

  38. 2-sided sequence: … z-3z-2z-1˙z1 z2 z3… Invariant set: C* = C+ ∩ C- • M is strongly chaotic on C*: • Stretch & fold mechanisms. • Sensitive on I.C. • (Unstable) Periodic points: z  Q. • Ergodic ( dense orbits ).

More Related