1 / 26

Schema and Memory

Schema and Memory. Reconstructing of the past. Recall versus Reconstruction. Rashomon. Akira Kurosawa Takehiro: a samurai has been murdered Masako : his wife has been raped Tajomaru : suspect Woodcutter : the witness. Lie or memory bias?. Schema memory theories.

akina
Download Presentation

Schema and Memory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Schema and Memory Reconstructing of the past.

  2. Recall versus Reconstruction • Rashomon. Akira Kurosawa • Takehiro: a samurai has been murdered • Masako : his wife has been raped • Tajomaru : suspect • Woodcutter : the witness Lie or memory bias?

  3. Schema memory theories • Bartlett (1932). Schemas are knowledge structures. • All kinds of knowledge can be represented by schemas. • New information is stored in relation to previous knowledge (TOP DOWN PROCESSING OF NEW INFORMATION). • Schema theory can help to explain errors and distortions common in memory because we tend to want to ‘normalise’ things in terms of existing knowledge.

  4. Experimental supportBower,Black & Turner (1979) • Students were asked to generate a script about visiting a health professional. • Later they read texts of, for example, what happened during a visit to a doctor or a dentist. • 26% of actions recalled were in the original script but not the later text. The students also tended to change the order consistent with the original script (canonical order).

  5. Encoding • Special attention – easy recall. • Ambiguous stimuli…

  6. Expectation Laura is warm Stimulus Smile Interpretation Warmth Expectation Laura is cold Stimulus Smile Interpretation Self-satisfaction Expectancies and Interpretation

  7. Interpretations and memory • Recall the impression, not the behaviors. • Forget the source of behavior

  8. Unambiguous stimuli. Attention • Schema-Congruent Information Beliefs Attention Memory Availability heuristic

  9. Unambiguous stimuli. • Schema-Congruent Information Meaningful structure Beliefs Memory Remember: unconventional, creative, sensitive, individualistic, temperamental…

  10. Schema memory theories • Original theory (Bartlett, 1932) • Information that is consistent with pre-existent knowledge will be remembered better than what is unexpected.

  11. Schema-plus-tag model Graesser and Nakamura (1982) • New knowledge is stored with the prior knowledge and a set of tags which indicate atypical and irrelevant pieces of information contained in it.  • Atypical events that are specifically tagged are therefore easier to recognise. 

  12. Unambiguous stimuli. Attention • Schema-Incongruent Information Beliefs Attention to unexpected Memory

  13. Unambiguous stimuli. • Schema-Incongruent Information Meaningful structure (Working hard to reconcile) Beliefs Memory When no time to elaborate the information – recall advantage disappears.

  14. Congruent or Incongruent? • Stangor and McMillan (1992) • High motivation, elaboration – Incongruent • Low elaboration – Congruent • Both congruent and incongruent > not relevant

  15. Memory accuracy • Goal to be accurate – more attention to the information.

  16. Flashbulb memories • Vivid recollections of the circumstances surrounding highly emotional events. Why?

  17. Flashbulb memories • Emotional significance • stress hormones contribute to memorability. • Working harder to make sense of the event. • Public and private rehearsals

  18. Expectancies during the retrieval • Cohen, 1981: Forming expectations before or after the event (librarian vs. waitress). Selection bias Expectancies

  19. Current knowledge • Hindsight bias • Once we know that something has happened, we believe that we knew so all along. • Why? Reinterpretation of past ambiguous events according to the current knowledge.

  20. Self-serving bias in memory • We selectively retrieve those memories that match the desired self-view. • Sanitioso, Kunda & Fong, 1990 IV: Motivation to be introvert or extrovert Results: More memories that support having the desired trait.

  21. Theories about stability or change • We tend to believe that we are stable in some domains and different on other domains.

  22. Exaggerating the Consistency between past and present • Ross et al, 1981. • Procedure • Message about dental hygiene: toothbrushing vs. floss. • Results • Reported more or less toothbrushing in the past.

  23. Exaggerating the Difference between the Past and the Present • E.g. Satisfaction with a useless self-improvement program.

  24. Mood • Mood-congruency effect • When we are happy, we are likely to recall happy events • Depressed people – more negative memories. • Mood dependancy effect • We are likely to recall events experienced in a similar mood.

  25. Sleeper-effect • Forgetting the source of information. • Circumstances: • Persuasive communication • Persuasive discrediting information • Optimal time delay (source is forgotten, but not the message)

  26. Conclusion: Schema and Memory • Memories are reconstructions of the past. • Our state of mind and external circumstances during the encoding and retrieval of the information affect the way we recall our past.

More Related