1 / 26

Dubna GDE Workshop ОИЯИ , Дубна, 0 4-06 .06.2008

Dubna GDE Workshop ОИЯИ , Дубна, 0 4-06 .06.2008. Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE Project Managers. Goals for 2008: Cost and Risk reduction SCRF CERN engagement R&D Plan Consolidation of RDR cost estimate To be reported LCWS 08 Chicago. Post RDR – ILC. One year later:

akira
Download Presentation

Dubna GDE Workshop ОИЯИ , Дубна, 0 4-06 .06.2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dubna GDE WorkshopОИЯИ, Дубна, 04-06.06.2008 Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE Project Managers • Goals for 2008: • Cost and Risk reduction • SCRF • CERN engagement • R&D Plan • Consolidation of RDR cost estimate • To be reported LCWS 08 Chicago M. Ross for PM - ILCGlobal Design Effort

  2. Post RDR – ILC • One year later: • Focus on R&D  • to mitigate technical risk • (some of which assumed for RDR) • to enable cost reduction • Managing the RDR • held kick off meetings • working on consolidating cost information • Strengthening links with partners • multi-lateral GDE • ca. 400 members M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  3. Superconducting RF R&D Three components to SCRF R&D: • Gradient (S0) • 35 MV/m baseline cavity gradient • should be able to build two x 11 km cold linacs with operational gradient 10% below this  realistically; practically • Demonstrations underway! • Plug Compatibility (includes S1) • Purpose: • Encourage innovation in R&D phase • Motivate practical ‘Project Implementation’ • System Tests (S2) • show that the whole complex functions M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  4. ILC SCRF R&D - 2008 Where are we? What has been done in 2008? Gradient (S0) Cavity • 10.2007 : • results from 15 cavities (DESY - Zanon) • some cavities tested many times; • field emission reduced using ethanol rinse • Average 31.5 MV/m • 06.2008 : • new batch of cavities (Accel) – 5 tested • industrial bulk electro-polish • first DESY - Accel results with ethanol rinse to suppress field emission • Accel Average: 36.2 MV/m • 850 cavities to be ordered this year for XFEL / EU FP7 • additional optical inspection systems in fabrication M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  5. ILC SCRF R&D - 2008 • Plug Compatibility (included in S1) Cryomodule • Progress toward consensus: due 2008 • This is a real step toward ‘industrialization’ for a global ILC • System Tests (S2) RF Unit • Partly started with ‘FLASH / TTF, 9 mA test’ • Full beam loading, high gradient (~ 30 MV/m avg) March 2009 M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  6. Accelerator Systems R &D: Beam Tests • Damping Ring Beam dynamics – electron cloud • CesrTA program moving forward  • Thanks to strong KEK / NSF-DOE support • beam tests now underway • First results LCWS 08 Chicago • Beam Delivery – Stabilization and Precision • ATF2 International Collaboration • First beam October 2008 M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  7. Chambers with Thin RFAs • Loss of US collaborators impacted development heavily • Cornell has picked up detailed design • Now ready for final design review • Construction now starting at LBNL as part of CU-KEK-LBNL-SLAC collaboration RFA Wiggler VC Delivered CesrTA Superconducting wiggler instrumented vacuum chamber

  8. ATF2 - 2008 M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  9. CFS Value Engineering • RDR is our baseline • strong, valid cost and design basis • the ‘uniform’ (teamwork-based) site development approach – • working closely together / • consolidating resources • Specific FOCUS GROUP goals for this workshop: • ‘Quantify cost impact for near-surface scenarios’ • requirement matrix • Develop ‘parametric models for infrastructure requirements’ •  M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  10. Cost cutting by increasing the temperature difference Fixed costs: chillers, pressed air, water treatment, auxiliary pipes, etc recooler: constant temperature difference for the heat flow at the cold side (e.g. the air temperature) insulation: always the same heat flow The outlet temperature should be less than 70°C: Otherwise the water will be to hot for some equipments

  11. CFS Value Engineering (2) The purpose of this workshop • (hence inter-group ‘focus groups’) • The Dubna shallow site: • subsurface ‘communication building’ cost 1/10 bored tunnel • RDR WBS input from GSPI (ГСПИ) to be provided • Next step: • Joint Development of Dubna site: • GDE (EU), JINR, GSPI • How to take best advantage of special features… M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  12. The Minimum Machine Study Are we here? cost cost Aim for here 500 GeV21034 cm-2s-1 Margin, risk reduction, redundancy, …(indirect performance) Physics “figure of Merit”(direct performance) Minimum cost machine Understand the performance derivatives Global Design Effort Global Design Effort

  13. Towards a ‘Minimum Machine’ Configuration Working Groups: Siting: Examine possible sites and evaluate possible design differences that accommodate features. Includes staging, design modifications and upgrade issues. Accelerator Systems: particular focus on the central injection complex, BDS and RTML. Beginning of the process of: Re-thinking the layout of the machine for a lower cost Look for new and innovative ideas – particularly staging options Defining the ‘minimum machine’ layout Global Design Effort Global Design Effort

  14. Output of Workshop sets the typical scale of possible reduction • Significant potential identified: • 4-5 km tunnel and beamline • ~100 MILCU for CFS • ~100 MILCU for acceleratorcomponents • All of the items discuss have associated impact on performance which will need to be quantified • Action items for LCWS • CMG and relevant TAG leaders Global Design Effort Global Design Effort

  15. Milestone – Dubna GDE meeting: • Release of the ILC Technical Design Phase R & D Plan • today • The plan includes an outline of our • strategy • work plan • schedule • deliverables • resources • constituency • very useful for management, reviews, funding agencies, … M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  16. R&D Plan Release 2 Look! NO DRAFT! Released today Next review and release:December 08 Global Design Effort Global Design Effort

  17. PM TD Phase 1 & 2 Schedule • A tentative top-level management plan for TD Phase 1 & 2 now exists • Published in R&D Plan • More detailed schedule being updated • MS Project • Part of release 2 • Encapsulates the PMs strategy and vision for the next four years • Critical R&D • Cost reduction / machine design • Project Implementation Plan Global Design Effort

  18. Critical R&D

  19. Design / Cost Reduction / PIP

  20. THE RDR LIVES ON ! Understanding the scope of the TDR (design/cost) work M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  21. CLIC-ILC Cost & Schedule Group Summary, future tasks • Two specific topics for collaboration: progress to be reported on at the CLIC workshop in October… • Defining common templates that will be gathered and/or used to catalog cost estimates from the technical groups • Timely, since both groups are in the process of developing such templates. • Could allow use of common analysis and reporting tools • Strongly linked with cost management processes and tools • Defining cost management processes and associated tools • Requires consideration of how the cost estimate data will be used: report generation, analyses, trade studies, etc • The CLIC group will be invited to participate in discussions on requirements for consultancy • Has a short timeframe for the ILC group since we are in the process of engaging a consultancy to support developing of cost management tools. • General comment: both groups are interested in learning from each other. Additional topics that came up during discussions include: • Structuring and organizing cost estimate information and bases of estimates • Handling uncertainty and risk in the cost estimates John Carwardine: [date] Global Design Effort Global Design Effort 23

  22. GDE Meetings: you requested: • fewer meetings: 3 down to 2. • One ‘collaboration-wide’  LCWS 08 Chicago • broad attendance and comprehensive program, please! • structure based on our Technical Area Groups • One thematic (this is the first) • Proposed for early 2009: • AAP Review – 3 days, plenary 2 days • advance planning • Conveners, focus / working groups M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  23. Homework for LCWS 08 Chicago: based on Dubna priorities: • CFS / Accelerator Design updates • Cost reduction • CFS change requests • complete Value Engineering cycle started here • Collaboration work and reports (e.g. CLIC – ILC) • R & D Plan updates • trade offs developed here • (the basis of value engineering is cost/performance trade off) M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

  24. To our JINR Hosts: • Позвольте выразить Вам от всего сердца бесконечную благодарность за проведение Совещания, за отличную организацию, гостеприимство и заботу! • Спасибо! • Thank you! • Excellent hospitality! Excellent organization! • Beautiful surroundings, excellent location, excellent logistics, etc! M. Ross for PM Global Design Effort

More Related