1 / 30

ILC Report

ILC Report. Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 1-Dec-06. RDR Design Freeze. Progress toward RDR. Baseline to a RDR. 2006. July. Dec. Jan. Frascati. Bangalore. Vancouver. Valencia. Freeze Configuration Organize for RDR. Review Design/Cost Methodology. Review Initial Design / Cost.

akiva
Download Presentation

ILC Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ILC Report Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 1-Dec-06 RDR Design Freeze Global Design Effort

  2. Progress toward RDR Global Design Effort

  3. Baseline to a RDR 2006 July Dec Jan Frascati Bangalore Vancouver Valencia Freeze Configuration Organize for RDR Review Design/Cost Methodology Review Initial Design / Cost Review Final Design / Cost RDR Document Design and Costing Preliminary RDR Released Global Design Effort

  4. Vancouver Cost Data Global Design Effort

  5. Costs by Area System Global Design Effort

  6. Costs by Technical & Global System Global Design Effort

  7. Optimizing Cost to Performance Global Design Effort

  8. Vancouver Costs for BDS • Cost drivers • CF&S • Magnet system • Vacuum system • Installation • Dumps & Collimators Total Cost Additional costs for IR20 and IR2 Global Design Effort

  9. 2/20 mrad  14/14 mrad • Motivation • Reduce costs • 2 mrad beam line expensive, risky, especially extraction line • Common collider hall • Advantages • Improved radiation conditions in the extraction lines • Better performance of downstream diagnostics • Easier design and operation of extraction optics and magnets • Reduced back scattering from extraction line elements • Disadvantages • Impact on physics (appears minor at present). • Simpler incoming beam optics • R&D on small crossing angles will continue as alternative Global Design Effort

  10. On-surface Detector Assembly • Vancouver WBS considered the underground halls sized at 32m (W) x 72m (L) each to allow underground assembly of the largest considered detector. • Conventional Facilities Schedule gives detector hall is ready for detector assembly 5 yrs from project start • If so, cannot fit our goal of “7years until first beam” and “8years until physics run” • Surface assembly allows to save 2-2.5 years and allows to fit into this goal • The collider hall size may be smaller (~40-50%) in this case • A building on surface is needed, but savings may be still substantial • Optimization needs to be done Global Design Effort

  11. On-surface assembly • CMS assembly approach • Assembled on the surface in parallel with underground work • Allows pre-commissioning before lowering • Lowering using dedicated heavy lifting equipment • Potential for big time saving • Reduce size of underground hall required Global Design Effort

  12. Cost details of new 14/14 baseline Should we go to a single IR and push pull system and save 30% of BCD costs? Updates from CF&S Magnets to be included Global Design Effort

  13. Push-Pull Evaluation • Initiated by GDE & WWS at the end of September • Detailed list of questions to be studied developed: • Large group of accelerator and detector colleagues, from ILC and other projects, is participating in design and discussion of these question • The task force of detector experts was formed to contribute to detailed evaluation of the whole set of technical issues http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/acceldev/beamdelivery/rdr/docs/push-pull/ Global Design Effort

  14. Cost Reductions Logged Our efforts at Valencia identified another 4.91%! Global Design Effort

  15. ILC Documents • Several reports for different audiences • Brochure – non-technical audiences, ready now • “Quantum Universe” level booklet ~30 pages • Executive Summary ~ 30 pages • Physics motivation, accelerator and detectors • RDR Report ~ 300 pages • high level description of the accelerator • DCR Report ~ 250 pages • physics and detectors Global Design Effort

  16. RDR Report • RDR is a high level description of the accelerator, CFS, sites and costs • A snapshot of what we propose to build • not a history of R&D, design evolution, and alternatives • Editors: • Nan Phinney (SLAC), Nobu Toge (KEK), Nick Walker (DESY) • Original schedule was complete draft now, but has been pushed back because of cost iterations Global Design Effort

  17. Reviewing RDR & Costs Global Design Effort

  18. Plans until Beijing (Feb. '07) RDR prepare 1st drafts RDR final editing November December January February 2006 2007 Valencia Further cost consolidation CCR preparation & submission Cost & Design Freeze 30/11 Prepare for Full Cost Review SLAC Cost Review 14-16/12 Final cost corrections and documentation MAC 10-12/01/07 Agency cost briefings Beijing: RDR draft published Global Design Effort

  19. Charge for MAC Review • On Wednesday 10, Thursday 11 and Friday 12 (until noon) January 2007, there will be an ILC MAC meeting at the Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury, UK. The major item for the meeting is the ILC cost and overall design, with specific MAC tasks: • Review the soundness of the overall RDR concept, identify any areas of concern, note what R&D is still needed, and comment on whether the performance parameters can be met. • Review the cost methodology and identify any areas of concern. • This will be the first occasion at which costs will be presented outside of the GDE. Global Design Effort

  20. What Happens after Beijing? • Public Release of Draft RDR and Preliminary Costing at Beijing • Cost Reviews, etc • Finalize RDR by Summer 2007? • Enter into Engineering Design Phase • Planning underway internally • Design will evolve through value engineering and R&D program • General Goal is to have Construction Proposal ready by 2010 Global Design Effort

  21. Proposed RDR Review Process Global Design Effort

  22. Siting Aspects of RDR&Candidate Sites Global Design Effort

  23. Site Aspects of RDR • Three Samples Sites • ILC Conventional Facilities Group: Jean-Luc Baldy (CERN), Vic Kuchler (Fermilab) and Atsushi Enomoto (KEK) + Support Group • Sample Site Analysis - Europe (CERN); Japan (?); US (Fermilab) also, TESLA for reference and Russia unsolicited • Conventional Facilities are expensive! Make narrow definition for “host costs” - goal ~ 25% of total. Global Design Effort

  24. Costs by Technical & Global System Global Design Effort

  25. Site Aspects of RDR • Three Samples Sites • ILC Conventional Facilities Group: Jean-Luc Baldy (CERN), Vic Kuchler (Fermilab) and Atsushi Enomoto (KEK) + Support Group • Sample Site Analysis - Europe (CERN); Japan (?); US (Fermilab) also, TESLA for reference and Russia unsolicited • Conventional Facilities are expensive! Make narrow definition for “host costs” - goal ~ 25% of total. • Costing Regional – Best estimates in “own” system of costing. They are close to equal, meaning the RDR siting chapter can concentrate on requirements, technical features, cost drivers, safety issues, other issues etc. • Need “true” candidate sites within ~ 1-2 years for realistic engineering design. How do we solicit candidate sites Global Design Effort

  26. CoordinatingGlobal R&D Global Design Effort

  27. The ‘S’ R&D Task Forces S0 High-Gradient Cavities S1 High-Gradient Cryomodule To address priority R&D items, RDB has convened several ‘task forces’. S0-S3 will report on Friday AM GDE plenary S2 Test Linac S3 Damping Ring S4 Beam Delivery S5…Sn Global Design Effort

  28. The ‘S’ R&D Task Forces • Addresses current ‘poor’ yield for EP cavities • Primary goal: establish parameters for routinely producing 35 MV/m EP’d cavities • required  80% yield S0 High-Gradient Cavities S1 High-Gradient Cryomodule S2 Test Linac S3 Damping Ring S4 Beam Delivery H. Hayano, T. Higo, L. Lilje, J. Mammosser, H. Padamsee, M. Ross, K. Saito S5…Sn Global Design Effort

  29. Summary • Status of Costing • First costing available at Vancouver (July) • Cost to performance optimization • Status & Plans for design modifications • Several proposals accepted and some rejected • Changes having physics impact (Valencia) • Complete RDR by Beijing Meetings • Global planning for critical R&D beginning • Formation of ‘S’ task forces Global Design Effort

  30. Some Key Issues • The RDR • The RDR is a snapshop of the concept and scope of the costs; NOT A MATURE DESIGN • It is an “optimized concept” for the physics scope (ILCSC parameters) without doing detailed engineering (value engineering) and future R&D (demonstrations and alternatives) • Engineering Design will be more cost effective, lower risk and maintain the physics scope. • Next Phase – Expensive • Resources and Organization ??? • Involve University Community in Acc Design/ R&D • Detector R&D  Road map - collaborations/detectors Global Design Effort

More Related