290 likes | 428 Views
Taskforce Meeting Zurich 6./7.09.2004. Summary and Progress Jochen Köhler, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Contents. Stress Strain Relation Serviceability DOL GLULAM Connections Quantification of model parameters. Stress Strain Relation. According to Glos (1978). Stress Strain Relation.
E N D
Taskforce Meeting Zurich 6./7.09.2004 Summary and Progress Jochen Köhler, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Contents • Stress Strain Relation • Serviceability • DOL • GLULAM • Connections • Quantification of model parameters
Stress Strain Relation • According to Glos (1978)
Stress Strain Relation • According to Glos (1978)
Stress Strain Relation • According to Glos (1978) Conditions:
Stress Strain Relation • According to Glos (1978) Conditions:
Stress Strain Relation • According to Glos (1978) Discussion: MOE in tension = MOE compression ? Quantification of asymptotic compression strength and strain. Modelling of N ? Typical values:
Stress Strain Relation Actions: • Quantify asymptotic stress • Include into the Model Code Coordination: Jochen Köhler
Serviceability • According to Torratti (1992): The following conditions apply • The deformations are calculated in the grain direction only • The maximum stress bending stress is 20 Mpa • Natural conditions environment conditions apply (temperature and humidity) • The model has been successfully compared to tests on European softwoods, both solid wood and glulam of different sizes
Serviceability Actions: • Producing a matrix for different load and climate situations. Therefore the following is needed: • quantify moisture loads (Lars-Oluf Nielsson (Lund)/study from DTU 2003) • quantify load sequences • acquiring data, quantify model parameters • doing calculations and sensitivity analysis Coordination: Tomi Toratti
DOL Limit state function: Model (Nielsen): Applied stress: combined with climate deviations
DOL Limit state function: Model (Barrett): Applied stress: combined with climate deviations
DOL Gaps: • DOL - Tension perpendicular to the grain • DOL - Connections
DOL Actions: • Acquire North American data • Review data, quantify model parameters • Distribute tasks according ‘Tension perpendicular to the grain’ and ‘Connections’ Coordination: John D. Sorensen
GLULAM • Glued laminated timber in BENDING • Load carring capacity depending on the outermost lamination • Lamination = timber boards with length a; jointed by finger joints • a is assumed to be Poisson distributed • The tensile strength and stiffness of each board is assumed to be constant and lognormal distributed. • The strength of the finger joints is assumed to be lognormal distributed
GLULAM Standard deviations?
GLULAM Actions: • Proposal of a simple model • Test data acquisition Coordination: Hans-J. Larsen
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • Johansen equations • “Splitting Mode parallel” • “Splitting Mode perpendicular”
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • Johansen equations
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • Johansen equations
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • “Splitting Mode parallel”
Connections Mixed Mode Fracture Energy
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • “Splitting Mode perpendicular”
Connections Probabilistic Framework: • Effective number of fasteners
Connections Actions: • Acquire test data • Case study – reliability analysis Coordination: André Jorissen
Quantification of Model Parameters Actions: • Collecting Data for a Data Base Coordination: