1 / 4

Irrigation Effects, 1 st Trial Vs. Peachtree Borer

Irrigation Effects, 1 st Trial Vs. Peachtree Borer. Treatments: n o irrigation, Irrigation (3X per wk over 2 wks ), Barricade, chlorpyrifos ( Lorsban ) Figure 1. Lack of irrigation = fail With irrig – suppression Barricade trt = L orsban.

alamea
Download Presentation

Irrigation Effects, 1 st Trial Vs. Peachtree Borer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Irrigation Effects, 1stTrialVs. Peachtree Borer • Treatments: no irrigation, Irrigation (3X per wk over 2 wks), Barricade, chlorpyrifos (Lorsban) Figure 1 Lack of irrigation = fail With irrig – suppression Barricade trt = Lorsban

  2. Effect of Application Method, 1stTrialVs. Peachtree borer • Treatments: commercial nematodes with boom sprayer, handgun, trunk sprayer, non-treated control. In vivo nematodes with watering can, chlorpyrifos(pos control); E-nema with handgun • Apply in fall, assess PTB infestation in spring Figure 2 • 7 trees per rep • 3 reps per treatment • High variation – no sig • Treatment differences

  3. Results of 1st Trial • After 1 h all treatments failed • Barricade protected nematodes in single spray up to 30 min Figure 3

  4. Field Trial Results vs. Lesser Peachtree borer: • Nematodes + Barricade at full and 2% rates provided control equal to Nufos (Lorsban) Figure 4

More Related