330 likes | 466 Views
The Impact of Climate Stressors on Coral Bleaching and Mortality : A Case Study of the 2005 Caribbean Summer. Student: Paul Welle Collaborators: Ines Azevedo Mitchell Small Sarah Cooley Scott Doney. Background. Eakin et al. (2010) Caribbean summer 2005
E N D
The Impact of Climate Stressors on Coral Bleaching and Mortality: A Case Study of the 2005 Caribbean Summer Student: Paul Welle Collaborators: Ines Azevedo Mitchell Small Sarah Cooley Scott Doney
Background • Eakin et al. (2010) • Caribbean summer 2005 • Bleaching, Mortality (dependent variables) • Temperature (independent variable) • Reproduced from Eakin (2010)
Temperatures 2005 Retrieved from http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/dhw.php
The data n=2945
Analysis can be Improved (1) Limited by the functional form of OLS We expand to a non-linear model. (2) Uncontrolled spatial correlation We add in fixed effects. (3) Limited number of explanatory variables We extend the dataset to include photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and pH. We also recalculate DHW.
What we Learned • DHW correlates well with bleaching and mortality, although there are indications that the 12-week interval should be lengthened. • PAR Anomaly correlates well with bleaching and mortality (PAR does not), but seems to be of less importance than DHW. • In predicting mortality, it is best to use the maximum value of a stressor, while predicting bleaching the recent (observed) temperatures are more important. • Depth is very protective against PAR. For deep corals (13.5m, or 80th percentile), PAR plays almost no part in predicting bleaching. For shallow corals (5m, or 20th percentile), PAR is roughly as important a stressor as DHW.
Method (OLS vs Fractional Logit) 100 100
Method (Manipulation of Continuous Data) maximum PAR, DHW, pH… observed time
Method(Variables) • Four stressor formulations • Temperature - Degree Heating Weeks (DHW) – 12 week • Photosynthetically Active Radiation – PAR 12 week average • Photosynthetically Active Radiation – PAR Anomaly • Simulated pH – Monthly average • Each formulation has 2 forms • “Maximum” – Hypothesized to be important for mortality • “Observed” – Hypothesized to be important for bleaching f( ) Bleaching -and- Mortality MaxDHW, ObsDHW, MaxPAR, MaxPAR Anomaly, ObsPAR, ObsPAR Anomaly, MaxPH, ObsPH =
Results - Mortality Robust standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Results - Bleaching Robust standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Results Bleaching Depth = 5 m Depth = 13.5 m
What we Learned • DHW correlates well with bleaching and mortality, although there are indications that the 12-week interval should be lengthened. • PAR Anomaly correlates well with bleaching and mortality (PAR does not), but seems to be of less importance than DHW. • In predicting mortality, it is best to use the maximum value of a stressor, while predicting bleaching the recent (observed) temperatures are more important. • Depth is very protective against PAR. For deep corals (13.5m, or 80th percentile), PAR plays almost no part in predicting bleaching. For shallow corals (5m, or 20th percentile), PAR is roughly as important a stressor as DHW.
References • Eakin, C. M., Morgan, J. a, Heron, S. F., Smith, T. B., Liu, G., Alvarez-Filip, L., … Bouchon, C. (2010). Caribbean corals in crisis: record thermal stress, bleaching, and mortality in 2005. PloS one, 5(11), e13969. • Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, a J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., … Hatziolos, M. E. (2007). Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science (New York, N.Y.), 318(5857), 1737–42. • McWilliams, J., Côté, I., & Gill, J. (2005). Accelerating impacts of temperature-induced coral bleaching in the Caribbean. Ecology, 86(8), 2055–2060. • Wilkinson, C. "Coral bleaching and mortality–The 1998 event 4 years later and bleaching to 2002." Status of coral reefs of the world (2002): 33-44. • Wilkinson, Clive R., and David Souter, eds. Status of Caribbean coral reefs after bleaching and hurricanes in 2005. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, 2008. • Yee, S. H., Santavy, D. L., & Barron, M. G. (2008). Comparing environmental influences on coral bleaching across and within species using clustered binomial regression. Ecological Modelling, 218(1-2), 162–174. • Yee, S. H., & Barron, M. G. (2010). Predicting coral bleaching in response to environmental stressors using 8 years of global-scale data. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 161(1-4), 423–38.
Support This work would not be possible without support by
data >30% <30% & >0% 0%
Degree Heating Weeks Typical Hottest Month
Data >30% <30% & >0% 0%
Summary • Questions: Which stressor form fits best- maximum, observed, or weighted average? Bleaching – Weighted Average Mortality – Maximum Does PAR or PAR anomaly fit the data better? Bleaching – PAR Anomaly Mortality – PAR Anomaly Does measuring independent maximums of temperature and radiation suffice, or must one account for simultaneously high peaks? Bleaching – Independent Mortality – Independent Is there evidence for a depth-stressor interaction? Bleaching – Yes Mortality - No
Model • Fixed Effects Fractional Logit Model • Logit– Used for binary dependent variables • Fractional Logit– Repurposed for bounded dependent variable • Fixed Effects – Used to control for homogeneity within groups • Maximize quasi-likelihood function: • Returns sigmoid in range (0,1)