490 likes | 618 Views
The Practice of Community Development Webinar Series. Small Town Strategies for Regional Work Bo Beaulieu Southern Rural Development Center – Mississippi State University. Webinar Overview. Defining what we mean by region Types of regions Why a regional approach
E N D
The Practice of Community DevelopmentWebinar Series Small Town Strategies for Regional Work Bo Beaulieu Southern Rural Development Center – Mississippi State University
Webinar Overview • Defining what we mean by region • Types of regions • Why a regional approach • Features of successful regions • Components of the SET (Stronger Economies Together) Program • Examples of SET regional efforts • SET metrics • What’s ahead with SET: Phase IV • Q & A
What is a Region? • Geographical area of similar characteristics: • Similar within • Different from other places • Place with a unique identity and meaning
Types of Regions • Functional • Economic • Political • Administrative • Data • “Issue” Each of these regions is valid. Which one you use simply depends on what you are attempting to do.
Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack “I have reached the conclusion that we must overhaul our approach to economic development in rural America. The framework of the new effort recognizes that the rural economy of tomorrow will be a regional economy. No one community will prosper in isolation.”
Why a Regional Approach? Promotes the Three Cs: • Conversation • Connection • Capacity Source: Council on Competitiveness (2010)
Features of Successful Regions • Leaders that recognize new realities of economic development • Commitment to collaboration • Global view • Understanding of current strengths and weaknesses • Flexibility and adaptability
Features of Successful Regions • Capacity to respond; the structure to support activities • Comprehensive view of development • Mechanism for continuously searching for opportunities • Way to document impact
Purpose of SET Help rural communities/counties work together as a regional team in developing and implementing an economic development blueprint that builds on the current and emerging economic strengths of their region. When Launched? Summer 2010
SET Regions: A Bottom-Up Approach Regions defined by applicants
Counties Involved in SET: Facing Key Challenges Percent n = 233 Note: Based on the ERS 2004 County Typology Codes
What SET Provides Regional Teams Technical Assistance Training Peer-to-Peer Networking Data & Analysis
Bringing Information to the Table • Current county and/or community economic development plans • Demographic profile • Analysis of economic clusters
Review the NCET Data • Study the handout • Identify information that you found most interesting • What impact might such data have on the economic development planning by a regional team?
Clusters in Your Region • What is the nature of the clusters that you are most familiar with in your region (that is, the region you most closely identify with)? • Stars • Emerging • Maturing • Transitioning • What clusters do you think are most dominant in rural areas of the U.S. right now?
Interpreting Data on Clusters Change in Percentage of Jobs in Industry over Time Moving Up or Down
Understanding Changes Relative Concentration of Industry in the Region Compared to the Nation Moving Left or Right
Percent Change in Jobs over Time Location Quotient: Measure of Concentration of Industry
The Leaky Bucket Goods or Services Purchased outside of the Region $ The Regional Economy
Strengthening Clusters throughImport Substitution Seek to Identify: • Industries that support the cluster • Goods and services being purchased from outside the region • Capacity for supplying these inputs regionally • Resources needed to help promote the capacity of local firms to supply inputs needed by the cluster(s)
C.A.R.E for the Cluster Source: Barta, et al (2010) CARE Model
Western Nevada Development District • 9 counties • Combination of metro and nonmetro counties • Received $45,000 grant from the Nevada Governor’s Office to help pursue the SET effort • SET forced leaders to think beyond the “usual suspects” by adding new interest groups • Helped ease the tension between urban and rural • Business and Financial Services, Energy/Mining, Arts/Recreation/Entertainment, and Agriculture selected as key clusters
Lower Rio Grande ValleyRegional Small Cities Coalition (Texas) • 4 counties in a highly impoverished region of TX • Regional group that was only one year old or less • Brought city managers and others from smaller towns and rural areas together • Felt they had more in common with one another than with the larger metro areas • Focus is on basic regional needs – such as housing, transportation, education, workforce development.
Raton Basin Regional Economic Development District • Borders New Mexico and Colorado • 3 counties (10,137 square miles) • New regional team; new connections made among members • SET was a catalyst to shift away from declining coal industry towards a focus on agriculture and tourism • SET increased their grant activities (i.e., Job Accelerator Grant application) • “We used to be locally focused, but because of SET, we now understand how we all benefit from a regional approach”
SET is Helping to . . . • Promote broad-based engagement • Build trust/social capital • Produce regional plans • Strengthen working relationships with RD, Extension, EDA, and others • Leverage resources
Expanding Engagement Membership: Increased from 464 to 1,679 members in the 39 regions (+ 362%)
Produce a Regional Plan . . . the most remarkable thing about the regional partnership is that a group of individuals have, out of their own initiative and drive, created a vision -- and from that vision have developed a plan that will support economic development in this region for years and generations to come. SET Regional Team Member
GOAL of the SET Program:Develop and Implement a High Quality Plan • Evidence-Based • Practical Team’s Regional Plan • Broadly Supported Aligned with Vision & Goals • Focused on Regional Economic Development
Strengthen Working Relationships:RD and Extension Service Low High
Leveraging Resources • Phase I and II: $5,642,387 • Phase III: $355,518 • Total Amount of Funds Captured to Date: $ 5,997,905
What’s Ahead for SET?New Regions to be Selected in2013 • Expand SET to about 12 new regions in 2013 • Proposals are due March 1 • Want more information regarding Phase IV? Go to: http://srdc.msstate.edu/set/phase4.html • Build stronger ties with federal agencies that share a commitment to regional innovation • EDA • Partnership for Sustainable Communities