1 / 20

Solution “6-2-6” U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program

Crisis & Risk International Services and Solutions (C.R.I.S.S.) Pedro Tichauer, Hyo-Jin Paik, Younghun Oh, Sinan Chu December 8 th 2009. Solution “6-2-6” U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program. A Policy Recommendation to the State Department Office of East Asian and Pacific Affairs.

alban
Download Presentation

Solution “6-2-6” U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crisis & Risk International Services and Solutions (C.R.I.S.S.) Pedro Tichauer, Hyo-Jin Paik, Younghun Oh, Sinan Chu December 8th 2009 Solution “6-2-6”U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program A Policy Recommendation to the State Department Office of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

  2. About Us:C.R.I.S.S., Maxwell School Crisis & Risk International Services and Solutions

  3. An Alternative U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program:Solution “6–2–6”

  4. Content: Background, Policy Outcome and Conclusion • Background • Nuclear Crisis and the Six-Party Talk • North Korea’s “Plan B” • Outcome Analysis of Solution “6-2-6” • Economic Impact • Political and Diplomatic Consequence • Social Issues • Conclusion A satellite image of the North Korea nuclear facility

  5. Background Information: Nuclear Crisis and the Six-Party Talk • DPRK and Its Nuclear Program • Political regime and foreign relations • Nuclear Program • Plan A and Plan B • Multilateralism • The “Six-Party” Talk • Five rounds from 2003 to 2007 • Latest Development • DPRK’s withdrawal from SPT in April 2009 • Current events

  6. Background Information (continued): DPRK’s Development of Nuclear Program

  7. Background Information (continued): The “Six-Party” Multilateral Negotiation North Korea (DPRK) Russia South Korea (ROK) U.S.A. China Japan

  8. Outcome Analysis I: Economic Impact

  9. Outcome Analysis I: Economic Impact

  10. Outcome Analysis I: Economic Impact

  11. Outcome Analysis I: Economic Impact

  12. Outcome Analysis I: Economic Impact North Korea’s Military Expense

  13. Outcome Analysis II:Political and Diplomatic Consequence • US’s Position: • NO Bilateral Talks • US alone cannot resolve the North Korean nuclear crisis • SPT: A better option than UN (General Assembly or Security Council) • New Administration: • Fresh Impetus

  14. Outcome Analysis II:Political and Diplomatic Impact

  15. Outcome Analysis II:Political and Diplomatic Impact

  16. Outcome Analysis II:Political and Diplomatic Impact Major Stakeholders in the “Six-Party” Talk

  17. Outcome Analysis II:Political and Diplomatic Impact • China • Political and Economic Ties with DPRK – less security concern • Refugee Concern • Imagine Building • South Korea and Japan • Security Concern • Refugee Concern • Diplomatic Normalization • Russia • Limited Political Power • Balance China and Japan North Korea

  18. Outcome Analysis III:Social Issues • Refugees • Humanitarian Aid • Social differences • Human rights

  19. U.S. Strategy towards DPRK’s Nuclear Program:Solution “6–2–6”

  20. Crisis & Risk International Services and Solutions (C.R.I.S.S.) Pedro Tichauer, Hyo-Jin Paik, Younghun Oh, Sinan Chu Questions? December 7th 2009Maxwell School, Syracuse University

More Related