1 / 10

Internet Assisted Review eRA Project Team March 26, 2002

Internet Assisted Review (IAR) allows reviewers to submit critiques and preliminary scores online, improving efficiency and effectiveness of meetings. The process includes registration, critique submission, read-only and optional edit phases, and summary statement generation.

alberthernandez
Download Presentation

Internet Assisted Review eRA Project Team March 26, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Internet Assisted Review eRA Project TeamMarch 26, 2002

  2. Overview Internet Assisted Review will allow Reviewers to: • electronically submit critiques and preliminary scores prior to the meeting • review the critiques submitted by others online • permit more efficient and effective use of reviewers’ time at meetings • modify their critiques after the meeting

  3. Overall Process Flow How does Internet Assisted Review fit into the existing Peer Review process?

  4. 1. SRA Prepares Meeting/ Reviewers for IAR: SRA finalizes meeting assignments, selects meeting for IAR and specifies critique submission and other deadlines. 2. Reviewer Registers for IAR: Reviewer account creation and registration via email. 6. Generate Summary Statements: draft bodies are built from critiques. 4. Read-Only Phase: After submission deadline, Reviewers “may” read other Reviewer’s critiques. If a reviewer has not submitted, the SRA “may” block the Reviewer from reading. 5. Optional Edit Phase: After the meeting, Reviewers “may” modify their critiques. 3. Post Phase: Reviewers log in and submit critiques and preliminary priority scores for their applications.

  5. IAR Focus Group Members Chair, Eileen Bradley (CSR) Roberta Binder (NIAID) Tracey David (CSR) Cynthia Lassnoff (NIAID) Neal Musto (NIDDK) Valeria Prenger (NHLBI) Ev Sinnett (CSR) Roy White (NHLBI) Brian Wojcik (NCI) OER Staff: Tracy Soto, Scarlett Gibb, Sherry Zucker, Mark Siegert, Sandy Seppala NGIT Staff: Daniel Fox, Adam Levy, Andy Greenleaf

  6. What have we done? • Architecture Decision Made: J2EE and Commons database • Security Evaluation of User Registration, Log On, Account Information Look Up, Account Expiration • Held 4 Focus Group Meetings: • Group approved overall business flow • Reviewed 2 Systems: • NIAID Electronic Review • NCI Clinical Trials Evaluation Program (used for both internal and external reviewer evaluation of proposed clinical protocols) • Requirements Documented and Validated for: • SRA/GTA Control Center and Post Phase (baseline)

  7. What do we still need to do? • Requirements Gathering and Validation for: • Registration and Account Management • Post Phase • Read Only Phase • Streamlining • (Post Meeting) Edit Phase • Summary Statement Generation • Meeting Data Purge • Define scope of versions to be delivered

  8. Deployment • Version 1 Pilot tentatively scheduled for July 2002 • Schedule will be finalized after Focus Group finishes requirements gathering and validation and defines scope of first version (May 2002)

  9. Meeting minutes, Scope document and Focus Group Presentations posted on the eRA site at http://era.nih.gov/areas/rev/index.cfm

  10. Any questions?

More Related