540 likes | 686 Views
Global Leadership Forecast 2011 Delaware SHRM April 10, 2012 . The Talent Management Expert. HR. Leadership Development Effectiveness. 33% 2006. 34% 2011. 29% 2009. 38%. 37%. 2009. 2011. Leadership Quality. HR. 25%. HR. Future Bench Strength. 18%.
E N D
Global Leadership Forecast 2011 Delaware SHRM April 10, 2012 The Talent Management Expert
HR Leadership Development Effectiveness 33% 2006 34% 2011 29% 2009
38% 37% 2009 2011 LeadershipQuality HR 25%
HR Future Bench Strength 18%
66% Confidence of Future Business Success 4% Low Leadership Quality High Leadership Quality
70% Retention 24% Low Leadership Quality High Leadership Quality
Engagement 50% 9% Low Leadership Quality High Leadership Quality
Financial performance 2.8x Customer satisfaction 4.6x Productivity 4.7x Quality of services 4.4x The bottom line 52% 13% Low Leadership Quality High Leadership Quality
Passion 53% 7% Low Leadership Quality High Leadership Quality
50%better Performance:Top vs. Average
About the Global Leadership Forecast 1,897 HR Professionals 12,423 Leaders 2,679 Organizations 74 Countries
Leadership Development Talent Systems & Practices Enhanced People Outcomes Enhanced Business Impact Quality of Leadership Management Culture
Leadership Development Development Matters Talent Systems & Practices Management Culture
62% EffectiveDevelopment = Quality Leadership 13% Low Development Effectiveness High Development Effectiveness
Leadership Development:What works today, maynot work tomorrow
Top Five PastCritical Skills Driving & managing change Executing organizational strategy Coaching & developing others Making difficult decisions Improving employee engagement
Top FiveFutureCritical Skills Driving & managing change Identifying/developing future talent Fostering creativity & innovation Coaching & developing others Executing organizational strategy
Leadership Skill Effectiveness: 50 / 50 Value Proposition
“Our CEO coined how we need to think about innovation. He said, ‘I’d rather be 8 and 2 than 2 and 0 in terms of willingness to try out something new’”.
Up The ValueChain Innovation Important 95% 90% 89% 72% Budget Increases 80% 82% 73% 49% Boston Consulting Group 2010
The Leader’s Role in Innovation Innovation Challenges Culture of Innovation Lack of Understanding Stakeholders Question Assumptions Inspire Curiosity Challenge Current Perspectives Lackluster Ideas Think Differently Aversion to Risk Create Freedom Experiment Failure to Execute Drive Discipline Get Things Done Leader Team Members
Effectiveness of Development Methods Formal classroom training Special projects or assignments Coaching from your manager Moving positions Coaching from internal coaches Web-based learning Coaching from external coaches Virtual classroom
HR Organizations that have effective programs use more methods. 32%
10~20~70 ON-THE-JOB FORMAL COACHING
Learning Mash-Up April-June July-September October-December January-March OrientationKick Off Formal Learning Action Learning Action Learning Action Learning Core Curriculum 2 Cultivating Networks & Partnerships Making Change Happen Learning through Transitions 3 days Core Curriculum 1 Challenges of Transitions Mastering EQ Influencing Courage 3 days Core Curriculum 3 Building High-Performing Teams Driving Innovation Supporting Leadership Development 2 days • Assessment: 360 and personality Inventories • Prework • Action Learning Kickoff Coaching Coaching Coaching DevelopmentPlanningMeetings (DDI Coach, Boss, Mentor) DevelopmentPlanningMeetings (DDI Coach, Boss, Mentor) Repeat 360 to Assess Behavior Change Informal Learning, Feedback, and On-the-job Experience Job Growth Experiences Manager/Sr. Leader Kick-Off Webinar Leader Blog: What leadership means to participant, how they will use new skills Discussion Board: Participants seek feedback from BU leaders on ideas, best practices Wikis: Tying leadership skills to business outcomes – how do they link together? Ongoing Feedback and Support = Assessments, Targeted Personal Development Focus = Action Learning & Ongoing Development = Core Curriculum = Learning 2.0 components
Talent Management Matters Talent Systems & Practices Leadership Development Management Culture
HR Firing on all cylinders 30% Programs & learning for mid-level leaders 76% 33% Programs & learning for senior leaders 74% 31% Programs & learning for frontline leaders 68% 31% Leadership Selection 79% 42% Performance Management 77% 22% Leadership Succession Future Importance 77% Current Effectiveness
Development Can’t Fix Everything • High • Customer focus • Developingstrong teams • Executingstrategy • Building future talent • Communicating with impact • Moderate • Risk-taker • Letting go • Making sounddecisions Low • Arrogance • Inquisitive • Ambitious • Volatile • Learning Orientation • Results Driven Select Develop
HR Hiring Failures: 1 in 3 External Internal Success Failure
81% Tied to corporate goals Performance Management 69% Balanced between “whats” and “hows” 56% Discussions provide clear direction for development
HR Succession 18% Rate Bench Strength Strong
64%of leaders made a leadership transition in the past 5 years BUT ONLY 26%of organizations have effective programs to ensure smooth leadership transitions
There’s a Difference Performance How one is performingnow in current role Potential One’s likelihood of leadership growth Readiness One’s fit with a specific role, job or job family
HR LeadershipPotential 50% 44% 39% 37% Growth of High Potentials Identification of High Potentials 2009 2011
HR Best Practices 88% 19% 87% 19% 60% 13% 48% 8% 46% 3% 43% 3% Organizations with effective talent management systems Organizations with ineffective talent management systems
Culture Matters Leadership Development Talent Systems & Practices Management Culture
“Right now, your company has 21st century Internet-enabled business processes, mid-20th-century management processes, all built atop 19th-century management principles.” Gary Hamel
Bureaucracy of management processes • Values that are not meaningful • Influence based on position power • Innovation opportunities for select few • Decisions are held closely by those in power • Rigid structure • Power held by those who value status quo • Goals only focus on bottom-line growth Management Culture Killers
Culture Impacts Passion 81% 57% 29% Low effectiveness of management culture Medium effectiveness of management culture High effectiveness of management culture
51% 31% Culture Impacts The bottom line 17% Low effectiveness of management culture Medium effectiveness of management culture High effectiveness of management culture
Management processes are a competitive advantage • Values are shared and meaningful • Merit-based influence • Innovation opportunities for all • Strategic decisions open for discussion • Flexible, nimble structure • Power held by those who value innovation • Goals of growth, sustainability, and social significance Management Culture Revolutionized