1 / 20

Shaped-beam Technology™ from brightLeaf

Shaped-beam Technology™ from brightLeaf. the Power of simplicity. Concentrating Photovoltaics (CPV): A Sound Legacy. Developed for NASA in the mid-1970’s by Sandia Labs and Spectrolab (a Boeing Subsidiary). CPV cell efficiency>40%, going to 50% in next year.

aldan
Download Presentation

Shaped-beam Technology™ from brightLeaf

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Shaped-beam Technology™frombrightLeaf the Power of simplicity

  2. Concentrating Photovoltaics (CPV): A Sound Legacy • Developed for NASA in the mid-1970’s by Sandia Labs and Spectrolab(a Boeing Subsidiary). • CPV cell efficiency>40%,going to 50% in next year. • Conventional PV efficiency declines 15-30% on hot sunny afternoon, CPV 5-10%. • Reduces chip volume by 99.7-99.9%. • brightLeaf’s proprietary technology minimizes CPV complexity and cost with maximum efficiency.

  3. Compare Traditional PV and CPV CPV = PV

  4. The Power of 1000 suns? W/in² of exhaust W/in² on brightLeaf’s cell =

  5. Parabolic Collectors

  6. Fresnel lens collectors

  7. Only Two Functional Parts brightLeaf’s proprietary technology: Non-parabolic Collector

  8. brightLeaf’s proprietary technology: Auto-aligning geometry

  9. brightLeaf’s proprietary technology: No Gaps, No Shadows™ Sun-eye view

  10. Greater Complexity = Greater Co$t

  11. The Potential of CPV and Shaped-Beam Technology™ • Industry-wide • Cell efficiency will reach 50% in near term • brightLeaf • Independent tracking modules for flexible configuration • Generate power from waste heat • Goal -- Cost parity with utility electricity without government support

  12. Executive Team • Douglas Kiesewetter, MBA – President • Founder of three companies of >$100 MM valuation, two >$50 MM • James Vander Mey, PhD – EVP/CTO • Founded two successful high-tech companies, Integral Data Systems and Intellon, which sold in 2009 for >$300 million • Michael Despres – VP Manufacturing • 25+ years experience in metal fabrication management • John Virden – VP Sales and Marketing • USNA graduate with 25+ years of marketing experience including IBM, AT&T and various start-ups

  13. PV Market • 2009 Global $40 BN; US $3+ BN • 2010 US expected growth rate >50% • US residences are 25-30% of total PV market • US Markets with shortest paybacks • Quality of Insolation- AZ, CA, CO, HI, NV • State Incentives- CT, IN, MA, NJ, NY

  14. Market Strategy • Maximum Cost Avoidance • Residential, Light Commercial & Industrial • Rural Electric Co-ops • Niches • Military • Remote Telecoms • Agriculture • Third World

  15. Competition • All other CPV companies target 1+ MW utility-grade installations • Conventional PV • brightLeaf 20-25% lower cents/kwh initially; 60-80% lower with higher manufacturing volumes • Utilities • With credits & rebates, brightLeaf lower cost in 75% of US • Within 2 years, brightLeaf lower cost without subsidies

  16. Base Case Revenue & IncomeManufacturing Margins 70-75%

  17. Investment • $3 MM of 5-year,12% debentures ($100K min. block) • Projected Closing Date September 30, 2010 • Warrants for 25% equity when principal fully repaid • Projected Secondary Offering after full year of profitability -- fund product and market development -- repay debentures -- establish higher equity valuation

  18. Return (Base Case) Simple Payout – 24 Months Internal Rate of Return – 108.77% 5.5 Yr. Cash on Cash Return – $35:1

  19. Downside Protection • Asset Support • Cash Balances • Equipment (85% of cost) • Accounts Receivable (75% face value) • Inventory (25% of cost) • Value of Asset Support (Base Case) -- Average coverage years one & two – 78% of net investment • Maximum exposure 2010-12 – 44% of net investment -- Coverage >100% of net invested from Q1 2012 forward -- Term of Exposure – 20 months

  20. Shaped-beam Technology™from brightLeaf the Power of simplicity

More Related