230 likes | 343 Views
Empowering patients’ organizations to overcome inequalities in cancer care Francesco De Lorenzo ECPC President. 12 th June 2014. ALL CANCER PATIENTS. ECPC Members in Action Conference 2009. ECPC: "Nothing about us, without us".
E N D
Empowering patients’ organizations to overcome inequalities in cancer care Francesco De Lorenzo ECPC President 12th June 2014 ALL CANCER PATIENTS ECPC Members in Action Conference 2009
ECPC: "Nothing about us, without us" • Representing 344 cancer patient groups in 46 countries • All cancers – common and rare • Run and governed by patients • Promoting timely access to appropriate prevention, screening, early diagnosis, treatment and care for all cancer patients • Reducing disparity and inequity across the EU • Encouraging the advance of cancer research & innovation • Increasing cancer patients' influence over European health and research policy • High visibility with EU Commission, EU Parliament (MEP MAC), EMA
Coordination & Advocacy National level European level ECPC Advocacy :bridging diversity to support cancer survivors
European Cancer Patient Coalition Activities:
Planned activities • Working Groups: Rare Cancers, Paediatric Oncology, Melanoma – personalised medicine, Biobanking, Access to employment and social benefits, Access to medicines and radiotherapy, Head and Neck Cancers. • European Projects:
Inequalities in cancer care: a European reality • Example: avg. cancer expenditures per citizen in the EU
Inequalities in cancer care: a European reality Old EU Member States New EU Member States
Joint Actions: harmonising national cancer plans • EPAAC • European Guide for Quality National Cancer Control programmesBasic document depicting the state of art of cancer care and providing fundamental suggestions to promote convergence in national approaches to cancer plans • ECPC Role • Voicing the need for an European Cancer Information System; • Stressing the importance of an EU strategy on rare tumours(in collaboration with ESMO - RARECARENet) • But it is not enough
Joint Actions: harmonising national cancer plans • CANCON • Acknowledges the existing inequalities in cancer treatment outcome in Europe; • Focuses on cost-effective interventions based on good practices; • Expected outcome: • Member State Platform dedicated on cancer; • European Guide on Quality Improvement in Comprehensive Cancer Control: guidelines for Member States to ameliorate their national cancer plans. • ECPC Role • Work Package 4: Coordination of the Guide drafting • Work Package 5: Member States Platform • Work Package 7: Community Cancer Care • Work Package 8: Survivorship and Rehabilitation • But it is not enough
Solution: European Cancer Plan • The causes of cancer care inequalities are not merely related to health policies, but also to general economic situation and social policies • Need for a pan-European, totalapproachin line with Council of the EU Conclusions on Reducing the Burden of Cancer, 2008 • An European Cancer Plan shall: • Be based on existing studies, like EUROCHIP and BenchCan; • Take into consideration EU legal and political framework, including the Cross Border Directive
Solution: European Cancer Plan - EUROCHIP Source: Verdecchia A. et al. European Journal of Public Health, 2008
Solution: European Cancer Plan - EUROCHIP • ECPC – OECI Conference • “How uniform is cancer care in Europe” • 18thFebruary 2014 • In EUROCHIP-3, the Work Package 7 proposed a strategy for reducing cancerinequalities investigating breastcancer management. • How?: Cost should be systematicallyconsidered in the evidence-basedevaluation for cancer care. Minimal-requirement-tools for acceptable treatmentconstitutes an innovative approach to enable public health authorities to identify priorities able to reduce disparities • Source: O. Pagani, “The work fo the EUROCHIP3 WP& on Breast Cancer”
Solution: European Cancer Plan - BenchCan • Objectives: • To collect, compare and align the standards and accreditation criteria of comprehensive cancer care; • To review and refine a benchmarking tool; • To pilot the benchmark tool with particular attention to operations management and best clinical practice. • To maximise knowledge exchange and sharing of best practice • Advantage: • BenchCan is directly created and managed bythe same European Cancer Institutesresponsible to deliver care to patients
Solution: European Cancer PlanRARECARENet Problem: few countries (e.g France) have recognised specialised centres for rare cancers • The Project • EAHC financedproject • Consortium of 11 partners • ECPC Deliverables • A list of 144 Rare Cancer patient organisations across Europe • An online library with information on rare cancers: • diagnosis, treatment and follow-up • The identification of Centres of Excelence for rare cancers in Europe (ongoing)
Solution: European Cancer PlanRARECARENet • FINDINGS Numberfo Rare Cancer patients organisation per Member State
Solution: European Cancer PlaneSMART • Objectives: • demonstrate the effects of a real-time, mobile phone based, remote patient monitoring intervention on key patient outcomes and delivery of care provided to people with cancer during and after chemotherapy • Outcome: • Creation of areal-time, mobile phone based remote patient monitoring system, the Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS) • Test of the ASyMS • ECPC’srole: • Provide guidance from the patient perspective; • Dissemination
Solution: European Cancer Plan - Advocacy • Cross Border Healthcare Directive • Enormous potential for cancer patients • Basis for the European Reference Networks • Directive adopted in 2011, in force since 2013BUTMost EU Member States still did not receive the directive! • ECPC-OECI need to keep advocating/overseeing on truthful application of CBHCD • New European Parliament and new Commission • Very dynamic (and delicate) political moment; • Application of Lisbon Treaty enhances Parliament’s power; • Need to act NOW!
European Cancer Patient’s Bill of Right &Call to Action • The Bill of Rights: • A catalyst for change: to provide every European citizen with the right tothe optimum standard of care; • Basic tool for all EU cancer patients • Widepolitical support • ECPC Call to Action • First action point derivedfrom theBill of Rights • A politicalmanifestofor the new MEPs,engagingthem in fighting cancer; • More than25 subscriptions, from all groups • Objective: creation of first cancer intergroup
Call to ActionList of endorsers Total: 28 MEPs …and counting!
Solution: European Cancer Plan – Advocacy Sharing best practices – The Italianexample • The issue: • EMA newly authorised drugs are not timely adopted by Member States; • Reimbursements arrive with huge delays. • The solution: • Translation of Article 44, paragraph 3, 5bis and 5ter of law n. 98, 9th August 2013 • Article 44, paragraph 5bis • AIFA is obliged to prioritise the classification of the new drugs falling within the categories expressed in paragraph Art. 44 paragraph 3 over any other pending classification process, given that the request for classification from the pharmaceutical company has been correctly submitted, including all the necessary supporting documents. • AIFA can schedule extraordinary meetings of its Commissions responsible for the classification of the aforementioned new drugs, in order to ensure the smooth and quick categorisation. • AIFA is obliged to finalise the process focategorisation of the aforementioned drugs within the limit of 100 days. • Article 44, paragraph 5ter • Pharmaceutical companies in process of receiving a market authorisation from the EMA for new drugs falling within the domain of Article 44 paragraph 3 are obliged to submit to AIFA a request for categorisation of the mentioned new drug within 30 days after having being granted the market authorisation from the EMA. • In case the pharmaceutical company would fail to submit the due categorisation request, AIFA will solicit prompt action, requesting the company to react within the successive 30 days.
Solution: European Cancer PlanBioBanking • Biobankingdoes not happenwithout patients/donors • Importance for patients: • Future research • Info on newlyavailabletreatments • Info for patients simblings • The issue: communicatebiobankingECPC’sinvolvement in Biobanking – EuroCanPlatfform WP10 • Dr. Peter Riegman has workedwith ECPC to create a FAQs document on Biobankingcovering the most important questions of interest for patients.
Take away messages • Europe is torn by unacceptable inequalities in cancer care; • Laudable efforts have been made to address this issue; • But a more brave and resolute action is needed: the creation of an European Cancer Plan; • Such plan shall take inspiration from existing research studies, run by the same scientific community that provides the best cancer care in Europe; • However, a broad advocacy effort is needed to keep cancer high on the EU political agenda and ensure that momentum is not lost.
Thank you very much! Nothing about us – without us! Please get in touch! Francesco De Lorenzo francesco.delorenzo@ecpc.org CHAMPIONING THE INTERESTS OF EUROPEAN CANCER PATIENTS (change footnote using Menu "View > Change headline/footnote")