1 / 10

K-modulation-MD 04.05.2011, 16:00 to 24:00

K-modulation-MD 04.05.2011, 16:00 to 24:00. T. Baer, K. Fuchsberger , J. Wenninger 24.05.2011. Procedure , (e.g. Q6.L5.B2). 2. Modulation. 1. Trim Bump at Quad. Strength change: k 1 ~1.4∙10 -4 (2.5%) Triplet: k 1 ~6∙10 -5 (limited by acceleration). f= 0.02 Hz

alden
Download Presentation

K-modulation-MD 04.05.2011, 16:00 to 24:00

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. K-modulation-MD • 04.05.2011, 16:00 to 24:00 • T. Baer, K. Fuchsberger, J. Wenninger • 24.05.2011

  2. Procedure, (e.g. Q6.L5.B2) 2. Modulation 1. TrimBumpatQuad Strength change: k1~1.4∙10-4 (2.5%) Triplet: k1~6∙10-5 (limited by acceleration) • f= 0.02 Hz • 2 oscillations =~100 orbits (100 s) Orbit rms in Arcs: (Example: Bump + 3mm, rms ~ 100 μm

  3. Tune change ± 0.015

  4. Q6.L5.B2

  5. Q6.L7.B2

  6. Q6.R9.B2/BPM.9R6.B2 (Aperturemeter) Large Offset in Orbit. Is it real? • Onlysmalloffset BPM/Quad. • Real beam position: ~1.5 mm!

  7. Summary

  8. Summary • Very clean rmssignals • Position canbedeterminedat least by ±10 μm. • Possibleoptimization: • Automatization (trimbump, startoscillation, acquire, analyse). • Less Datasets (increasefrequency, reduceamplitude) • Analysis oftripletdataongoing.

  9. … the end • Thankyou!

  10. Proposed method • scanΔx with local orbit bump until: beam Δx‘ Δx

More Related