880 likes | 964 Views
I’ll be running late Tuesday — dental appointment. Lecture 10: More Forcing (plus). Things you should know. Scaling. Rotating imbalance as forcing. Vibration of a gear train (from DH Problem 31). Impulsive loading. Problem strategies: understanding and solving problems.
E N D
Lecture 10: More Forcing (plus) Things you should know Scaling Rotating imbalance as forcing Vibration of a gear train (from DH Problem 31) Impulsive loading Problem strategies: understanding and solving problems Den Hartog problems 41, 50, 56
Some things engineers should know if you do, congratulations the mass of an object is its density times its volume (see Archimedes) the density of water is about 1000 kg/m3 and the density of air is about 1.23 kg/m3 the density of animals is a little less than that of water (most animals float) the density of steel is about 7800 kg/m3 and the density of aluminum is about 2700 kg/m3
A cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 lbs A gallon of water weighs about 7 lbs Gasoline is lighter (less dense) than water The pound is not a unit of mass — you have to divide by g (in the appropriate units!) Air drag is proportional to
Scaling How to write problems independent of dimensions, minimizing the number of parameters The remaining parameters are dimensionless At this point, we have one of these: the damping ratio You had a bunch of these in fluids and heat transfer: Reynolds number, friction factor, Rayleigh number, Grashof number . . . I’ll go at this slowly in the context of a problem we are familiar with
The generic problem m c f k Divide by m to get a partially nondimensional equation
If I can make the equation fully nondimensional, then I can solve it once for all Scaling We’ve taken mass out and have only length and time to play with pickt = 1/wn
Now we have a once for all problem with two dimensionless parameters: z and r a damping and a frequency ratio The particular solution which we need to expand and sort out (we’ve done this before)
The homogeneous solution (for the underdamped case) which we can also map back We can do initial conditions in either the scaled or physical world
Here are the initial conditions in scaled form and we can solve these
QUESTIONS? Now let’s look at more forcing mechanisms
Rotating imbalance m w denote the offset distance by a0 M M includes the yellow mass and the blue rotating mass but not the black imbalance mass
Centripetal force Suppose the system to be constrained from side to side motion We get a standard undamped equation
Make the usual assumption for an undamped 1 DOF system solve for the amplitude This is the particular solution
We don’t much care about the transient if we are running the unbalanced machine all the time m What is the force on the ground? w M
All we have is a spring force f = kz where z denotes the particular solution we’ve just found. We get
For w small compared to the natural frequency For w large compared to the natural frequency
Plot with wn equal to unity (without loss of generality)
Let’s look at this with dissipation in the underdamped case The acceleration is given by and it is harmonic at sine The particular solution is for an acceleration A
so we have We care about the frequency-dependent part
We can find the amplitude easily enough We see that this looks a lot like the undamped formula, as it must (In looking at the amplitude we miss the change in phase through resonance)
We can plot the amplitude of the undamped and the damped on the same graph At this small damping ratio, there is little difference outside the resonance.
QUESTIONS? Vibrations of a gear train: one degree of freedom model
Label the outside gears 1 and 2 from left to right and the inside gears 3 and 4 from bottom to top Label the shafts 1 and 2 from left to right 2 4 2 1 3 1 Denote the diameters of the transmission gears by D3 and D4, respectively
We’ll have k1 and k2 associated with the shafts The gear ratio n = D3/D4 (= 2) The gear box is “perfect” gear 4 turns at –n times the speed of gear 3
We have equations of motion for all four gears, but the gears in the transmission have negligible inertia, so we can address them statically with free body diagrams The main gear equations are If we choose the proper common origin, q4 = -nq3
Free body diagrams The transmission t2 4 F4/3 F3/4 3 t1
Plug in for the two torques Solve for q3
substitute for q3 divide by the inertias
subtract (4) from n times (3) This is now a one degree of freedom problem and we see that which is equivalent to the formula in Den Hartog
QUESTIONS? What happens to our standard system if we hit it?
Impulsive forcing m c k
integrate from just before the interaction to after the interaction mean displacement mean force the system is at rest before the interaction, so change in momentum
negligible We can solve these problems as homogeneous initial value problems the mass of the struck object not the mass of the striker generally supposed to be zero I’ll do that
The momentum transferred depends on the nature of the collision The collision takes place quickly enough that the sum of the momentum of the struck mass and the striking mass is conserved If perfectly elastic, the momentum transferred is twice the hammer momentum Look at a scaled result: Dp = 1, m = 1,wn = 1, z = 0.1
maximum displacement is 0.8626 at t = 1.4780
Mathematica code to find the amplitude and location of the peak We can extend the displacement picture by plotting out to two (or more) actual periods for various values of the damping ratio
You can “undo” the scaling by multiplying the displacement by Dp/m dividing the time by wd
Let me look at how this connects to what we might think of as an impulsive load Start with the differential equations and set the forcing equal to a delta function at t = t0 with zero initial conditions