1 / 62

Aye Aye Min, Khin Swe Myint, J. Esmaili & Yoshinori AKAISHI

Theoretical Investigation for Production of Double- L Hypernuclei. from Stopped Hyperon on. By. Aye Aye Min, Khin Swe Myint, J. Esmaili & Yoshinori AKAISHI. August 23, 2011. APFB2011. Abstract. Investigation of the formation ratio of to for various

Download Presentation

Aye Aye Min, Khin Swe Myint, J. Esmaili & Yoshinori AKAISHI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theoretical Investigation for Production of Double-L Hypernuclei from Stopped Hyperon on By Aye Aye Min, Khin Swe Myint, J. Esmaili & Yoshinori AKAISHI August 23, 2011 APFB2011

  2. Abstract • Investigation of the formation ratio of to for various • absorptions from 2S, 2P and 3D orbitals of atom by • assuming a d-a cluster model for • We have also investigated differential cross section for single-L • hypernuclei, and . • Two kinds of d-a relative wave function namely 1s d-a relative wave • function with phenomenological One Range Gaussian (ORG) potential • and that with Orthogonality Condition Model (OCM ) were used in our • calculations.

  3. Emulsion Experiment (K. Nakazawa , Nucl. Phys. A 835 (2010)) p t (T. Fukuda et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)) BNL DBLL : LLinteraction energy DBLL = BLL(ALLZ) - 2BL(A-1LZ) Weakly attractive LL Interaction ! • It is worthwhile to measure the masses of double-Lhypernucleifor several nuclear • species to determine L-Linteractionwithout ambiguities.

  4. S = 0 sector S = -1 sector S = -2 sector XN ~ 28 MeV LL DN SN ~ 80 MeV LN LL-XN coupling effect in ~ 300 MeV (K.S. Myint, S. Shinmura and Y. Akaishi, Nucl. Phys. A 721 (2003) 21) NN Although coupling effect is not significant in non-strangeness sector, coupling effect plays an important role in strangeness sector.

  5. Production of Double-L Hypernuclei • In order to produce and , the reaction is d d P P • Target ( ) P P n n t t a a d-a cluster structure X X

  6. X L X D Double-L hypernucleus P L S Single-L hypernucleus and L-hyperon Absorption of X- in atom and Production of hypernuclei L L X Two single-L hypernuclei Elementary process for the reaction H-dibaryon and ordinary nucleus L L H 28.33MeV twoLhyperons and ordinary nucleus L L

  7. Table 1. Possible reactions for the stoppedhyperon on

  8. Formation from stopped on p p p d d d n n n L L X d t • internal wave function of • sub-systems • relative wave functions Triton(t), deuteron(d) L t L t P proton-triton (p-t) deuteron-alpha (d-a) t wave function for target Transition matrix , Transition matrix in terms of relevant momenta ,

  9. Interaction for elementary process • Interaction for elementary process,is described by • separable potential. where L L p • By assumption the interaction is zero range ,

  10. Decay width to and deutron We will discuss later! • Decay width ( ) is

  11. Formation p p p n n n n n L L X P n a L a L a a 1. GBWF (one range phenomenonlogiacl Gaussian potential) 2. GBWF (OCM model)

  12. Construction of relative d-a wave function by usingone range phenomenological Gaussian potential • Gaussian basis radial wave function for d-a cluster is bj= range parameter and cj= the expasion coefficient 2.0 fm • Gaussian one range potential -85.42 • weadjusted the potential strength( -85.42MeV) to give energy eigen value • of 1s state(-1.48 MeV ) andeigen function corresponding to this 1s bound state . • By applying Fourier transform,

  13. Construction of relative d-a wave function with OCM • The Gaussian potential between a and x particle (E. Hiyama et.al., arXiv:nucl-th 24 (2002) 0204059.) Where, = relative angular momentum between a and x = the spin of x • For our system, case, x is deuteron and . The potential strengths and range parameters for a-d system

  14. The Pauli principle between nucleons belonging to aand x (x = n, p, d, t ) • clusters is taken into account bythe Pauli projection operator or OCM • projection operator • The forbidden states for d-acluster are 0s and 0p states. Monte Carlo integration Method

  15. Models of single L-hypernuclei

  16. Results and Discussions d-a density distribution of In coordinate space Table 2. Formation ratio of to from stopped hyperon on B.E ( ) = 5.0 MeV K.S. Myint, S. Shinmura and Y. Akaishi, Eur. Phys. J. A 16 (2003) 21.

  17. d-a density distribution of (in momentum space) to clarify this argument more profoundly! effect of low and high momenta component of d-a relative motion ??? qda (MeV/c) This wave function ( 0s′ ) is obtainedby reducing the strength of one range Gaussian potential (-19.152MeV)to give the ground state energy, E = -1.48 MeV.

  18. Significance of d-a relative momentum contribution formation is enhanced and formation is dropped off significantly! It is important to understand the structure of a target to propose a feasible reaction to populate double-L hypernuclei from hyperon captured at rest.

  19. For single-L hypernuclei case, and are at rest! 150 MeV/c 113.82 MeV/c 192.0 234.0

  20. Concluding remarks Formation of is more dominant thanthat of for all absorption orbitals; 2S, 2P and 3D states from this reaction (1.1 for ORG and 2.0 for OCM for the major 3D absorption case). Low momentum component of d-a relative wave function favors the formation. Binding energy of can be measured without ambiguities. It may be deduced the significance of L-X coupling effect from this experiment. Thus, we have proposed a feasible reaction which can produce , , and with comparable branching ratios.

  21. Thank you for your kind attention!

  22. LL-XN coupling effect in X + p + t 28.33 MeV X0+ n + t 23.21 MeV Pauli Suppression effect 8.0 MeV X-+ a L + L + t 0.0 MeV X-+ p+ t Coupling effect enhancement

  23. Binding Energy of d-a cluster by changing the strength of l value

  24. E =-1.48 MeV -85.42 -85.42 -19.152 -85.42

  25. formation formation X X d d d Proton speration ~ 19.81 MeV energy n P P P P n n B.E(d ) =2.224 MeV t t t a a a X n X L L L L

  26. Pd=191.80 MeV/c KEd=9 MeV KE(LL5H)= 3.04 MeV Q=12.04 MeV Pn= 232.47 MeV KEn=28 MeV KE(LL6He)= 3.88 MeV Q=31.88 MeV

  27. The required data are;

  28. formation formation X X d d d Proton speration ~ 19.81 MeV energy n P P P P n n B.E(d ) =2.224 MeV t t t a a a X n X L L L L

  29. Abundant of Lithium 7% X X 93% d t P P t t -2.5 MeV -1.48 MeV 6Li 7Li

  30. New data from Nagazawa Sensei (BE(LLHe6)) Old data from Nagara_paper (BE(LLHe6))

  31. Table 3. Probabilities of momentum components of d-a relative wave unction of

  32. Introduction Lhyperon • can stay in the nucleus deeply without obeying Pauli exclusion principle • probes a deep interior of the nucleus and investigates the nuclear • structure L hypernucleus • gives a new dimension to the traditional world of nuclei • provides the rich information on the baryon dynamic involving the • strange particles

  33. Possible production of hypernuclei • Strangeness-exchange process etc. • Associated production of strange-hadrons process etc. • Combination of strangeness exchange and associated production • of strangeness process etc.

  34. High energy heavy-ion collisions Spectator -projectile fragment L coalescenceof hyperons to projectile fragnent participant Spectator -target fragment theoretical model (Wakai, Bando, Sano) From Professor Dr T. Fukuda’s Presentation

  35. High energy heavy-ion collisions • Coalescence of strange particles with a nuclear fragment produced • in projectile nuclear fragmentation • Coalescence of strange particles and nucleons bothproduced • in the participant part • Secondary process by p and K mesons produced in the primary • nuclear collisions • Conversion of X- hypernucleus into single and double-L hypernucleus F L p n S ( at 2.1 GeV/nucleon ) p etc. K X F ( at 3.7 GeV/nucleon ) ( at 14.5 GeV/nucleon ) ( at 2.1 GeV/nucleon )

  36. Inorder to produce a hypernucleus, • The hyperon emerging from the reaction must remain in the nucleus. Momentum transfer to the hyperon Formation probability of the hypernucleus • Sticking probability, n ,= principal quantum number and orbital angular momentum for nucleon and hyperon state where, q = momentum transfer to the hyperon = bessel function with the orbital angular momentum transfer ( initial and final states are Harmonic Oscillator wave functions )

  37. Direct Process Via X atom K+ Prowse (?), Danysz et al. KEK- E 176, E373 BNL- E906 K+ K- K+ P P KEK-E 176 -E 224 KEK-E 176 -E 224 K- K- K+ K+ K- X- H K- L L BNL-E 885 BNL-E 813 -E 836 -E 885 X- X-or H (?) X KEK-E 176 KEK- E 176 E373 L K+ A L L X- atom p0 K- A KEK-E 224 L KEK- E 176 E 224 BNL- E 885 L L L L L L L L or H L L

  38. Possible Candidates of double-L hypernuclei in emulsion experiments H. Takahashi, “PhD Thesis”, Kyoto University (2003)

  39. Double hyper event from E-176 experiment KEK-PS E176 LLinteraction energy attractive or repulsive ??? or

  40. Double hyper event from E-373 experiment p t DBLL : LLinteraction energy DBLL = BLL(ALLZ)-2BL(A-1LZ) Weakly attractive LL Interaction !

  41. Nakazawa Sensei, 2003 Presentation (at J-Lab)

  42. Nakazawa Sensei, 2003 Presentation (at J-Lab)

  43. KEK-PS E176 or (Possibility of excited state was not considered!)

  44. KEK-PS E373

More Related