130 likes | 150 Views
NAIP Summary. USDA Planning Meeting December 7, 2005 John Mootz Contracting Officer USDA-FSA-Aerial Photography Field Office. NAIP Contract Overview. 3 year (’04 ’05 ’06) Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract Awarded in 2004 to 10 contractors
E N D
NAIP Summary USDA Planning Meeting December 7, 2005 John Mootz Contracting Officer USDA-FSA-Aerial Photography Field Office
NAIP Contract Overview • 3 year (’04 ’05 ’06) Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract • Awarded in 2004 to 10 contractors • Task Orders competed using “best value” procurement process • Performance Based Contract: defines end product rather than how to produce that end product
2002 NAIP 2003 NAIP 1,038 Counties 121 Counties 2004 NAIP 2005 NAIP 2,089 Counties 2,445 Counties
Potential2006 Funding Sources USDA Agencies $4,600,000 Other Federal Agencies $3,000,000 State/County Gov’t Agencies $3,000,000 Estimated 2006 Cost Shares: $10,600,000 Estimated FSA Funding $19,400,000 2006 NAIP Funding Total: $30,000,000
Specification Changes • 2004 season: • Radiometric correction required (CCM) • Satellite vendors allowed (subcontracts) • One year product warranty added • Vendors allowed to resell “derived” material • 2005 season: • Pan-sharpen sensors allowed on 1m products • Changed compression ratio from 50:1 to 15:1 • 1m accuracy changed from ±3m to ±5m
Specification Changes (con’t) • 2006 season: • Require CCM samples for color balance • Divide several states in multiple project areas
Types of Partnership Opportunities Federal, State, or County Cost Share with FSA for: • New Coverage Beyond FSA Counties • New Coverage Beyond Agricultural Areas of a County • Higher Resolution Image Upgrade
Contractor Resaleof NAIP Derivative Products Federal, State, or County Governments may purchase “after contract” products: • Image Type: • Color Infrared vs. Natural Color • Projection System: • State Plane vs. UTM • Higher Resolution: • Sub-meter vs. 1 meter