1 / 9

University-Industry Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in the Open Innovation Framework

The 2013 University-Industry Interaction Conference, Amsterdam 27.- 29.05.2013. University-Industry Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in the Open Innovation Framework. Antero Kutvonen Janne Lehenkari Mika Kautonen Irina Savitskaya Juha Tuunainen Reetta Muhonen. Introduction.

alena
Download Presentation

University-Industry Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in the Open Innovation Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The 2013 University-Industry Interaction Conference,Amsterdam 27.-29.05.2013 University-Industry Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in the Open Innovation Framework Antero Kutvonen Janne Lehenkari Mika Kautonen Irina Savitskaya Juha Tuunainen Reetta Muhonen

  2. Introduction • Exploring the intersection of open innovation and university-industry collaboration • Focus on the ‘reverse’ direction of knowledge transfer, from firms to universities • Simplified systematic literature review

  3. Systematicliteraturereview

  4. The different forms of knowledge transfer between universities and external actors. Cf. Perkmann et al 2012; Salter & Martin 2001; Abreu et al. 2009. University-industry links

  5. Commercialization of research, formal and informalcollaboration • IPR commercialization and entrepreneurialacademicsarestillnot common (D’Este & Patel 2007) • Motives are mainly non-pecuniary (D’Este & Perkmann 2011; Bozeman et al. 2013) • Allmodes of commercialcollaboration show significantindustry and national differences • Researchfocused on transferringuniversityknowledge to firms, althoughreciprocity is acknowledged & seemshigher in informallinks

  6. The open innovationframework • OI as a framework for organizing and managingboundaryspanningknowledgeflows • Universitiesrepresent a special case of OI  coupledmodes of open innovation highlighted • The fewstudiescoupling OI and UII emphasizerelationallinks(Perkmann & Walsh, 2007, Levy et al., 2009) • Open questions: matchingprocesses;strategies, organizing and managingcollaborations; and the role of national innovation system(West et al., 2006; Perkmann & Walsh, 2007)

  7. Publicationanalysis

  8. Conclusions • Emphasis on bi-directionalknowledgetransfer and use of open innovation conceptincreasedstrongly in the lastfiveyears • Open innovation usedmainly as an ’umbrella’ • Universities as utilizers of firm-basedknowledge is a rare, butvaluableviewpoint • Insightsfromacademicliterature on open innovation is a valuableviewpoint to expandunderstanding in knowledgetransfer

  9. Antero KUTVONEN Lappeenrantauniversityoftechnology Finland Prikaatintie 9, FI-45100 Kouvola Tel: +358 50 348 8768 Email: antero.kutvonen@lut.fi Internet: www.lut.fi Contact information: Thank you for your attention!

More Related