1 / 19

Greening the future Cohesion Policy

Greening the future Cohesion Policy. Thessaloniki, 16.07.05 Georges Kremlis, Head of Unit, Cohesion Policy & Environmental Impact Assessments, DG ENVIRONMENT European Commission E-mail: georges.kremlis@cec.eu.int. Sixth Environmental Action Programme (6 th EAP). 2002- 2012

aletta
Download Presentation

Greening the future Cohesion Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Greening the future Cohesion Policy Thessaloniki, 16.07.05 Georges Kremlis, Head of Unit, Cohesion Policy & Environmental Impact Assessments, DG ENVIRONMENT European Commission E-mail: georges.kremlis@cec.eu.int

  2. Sixth Environmental Action Programme (6th EAP) • 2002- 2012 • Full co-decision • Four main priorities • Climate change • Biodiversity • Sustainable use of resources • Links with health • Seven thematic Strategies (Clean Air for Europe, Soil Protection, Sustainable Use of Pesticides, Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment, Waste Prevention and Recycling, Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, Urban Environment)

  3. Environment and Lisbon (I) • Environment is a new “industry” • Over 1.5 m jobs in Germany (more than car or food sectors), 1 in 6 jobs and 9% of GDP in Wales • Over 2.2 m jobs in EU eco-technology industries • EU is a world leader in eco-technologies – over €400mn trade surplus for air and water in 2004 • Waste prevention and efficient use of resources save companies money • Environmental standards act as a strong dynamic for “innovation” • High environmental standards are essential to maintain the integrity of the single market - avoiding eco-protectionism

  4. Environment and Lisbon (II) • Postponing action now will cost more in the future • Health costs of no further action on air - €50 -100bn • Recent costs of extreme weather events - $27bn global insured losses in 2004 • Insurance industry estimates of costs of climate change - $100bn pa in 2010

  5. Implementation deficit • Some 1200 open cases on environment • 25% of total Commission case load • Nature • Environmental impact assessment • Waste • Water • Pro-active approach to helping Member States • Meetings • Guidelines • Infringements / Court action / fines

  6. New Member States • More than 10 years of alignment with environmental acquis through pre-accession strategies • Rich in biodiversity (e.g. eastern Poland – Via Baltica) • Significant improvements have occurred in air and water quality resulting in better health • Investment needed of € 50-80 billion for compliance with environmental acquis in EU 10 • Transition periods for investment heavy acquis

  7. What we have achieved so far 2000-6– environmental financing • Around 16% foreseen for environment in Objectives 1 & 2 in EU15 2000-6 (“vertical” and “horizontal” integration) • 50% of the Cohesion Fund (CF) set aside for environmental infrastructure in EU25 (mainly “vertical” integration) – • but 50-50 share not always achieved in all countries • Increase by 75% of expenditure on environment from 1994-9 period in EU15 • Around €8 billion for EU12 2000-6 for environment for SF, CF, ISPA, PHARE & SAPARD

  8. What we have achieved so far 2000-6– environmental compliance • Natura 2000 (Commissioner letter; complementary Guidelines 2003) - precautionary approach applied for last 3 years in EU25 with need to provide lists before potentially damaging projects implemented; commitment to co-finance Natura 2000 network • Nitrates Directive (Commissioner letter) - similar approach to Natura 2000 on designating nitrate vulnerable zones • Waste plans (Guidelines of 1999) – e.g. requirements in Community Support Framework for Italy in absence of agreed waste plan • Environmental Impact Assessment consolidation (acquis) – e.g. negotiation of Operational Programmes sped up regional implementation in Italy • Urban wastewater Treatment (Commissioner letter) – Ireland/Cohesion Fund due to lack of designation of sensitive areas • Dams (Commissioner letter) – Cohesion Fund for environmental purposes not agricultural • Water Framework Directive (complementary Guidelines of 2003) – requirement for water investments to be in line with WFD • Polluter Pays, Prevention and Precautionary principles (Treaty)

  9. Environment in the future Cohesion Policy • General Provisions Regulation – investments must reflect Community environmental and sustainable development priorities (Art. 3), respect of acquis (Art. 8),environmental partners (Art. 10) • High priority to environment and risks in proposed ERDF Regulation • Investment heavy environmental projects and sustainable energy and transport projects in proposed CF • Capacity Building in ESF • Draft CSG Guidelines of 05.07.05 contain strong messages throughout to invest in environment contributing to renewed Lisbon Agenda and the Sustainable Development Strategy

  10. In particular CSG: Making Europe and its regions a more attractive place to invest and work • expand and improve transport infrastructure -sustainable urban and inter-urban transport • improving the environmental contribution to growth and jobs • infrastructures for air, water, waste, nature and species protection in Convergence regions • promoting landuse planning to reduce urban sprawl, physical rehabilitation including natural and cultural assets • Investment to promote Kyoto commitments in addition to those to promote sustainable energy and transport • Risk prevention through improved management of natural resources, RTD, ICTs and public management policies • addressing Europe’s intensive use of traditional energy sources – renewable energies and energy efficiency

  11. DG ENV – investment priorities in line with CSG for NSRFs and OPs • Water investments in line with Water Framework Directive (urban wastewater treatment, water supply) • Waste management in line with agreed waste plans • Combating climate change (sustainable energy and transport in Cohesion Fund), air pollution, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control • Urban transport/urban environmental policy • Natura 2000 • Natural and Technological Risks • Coastal zones (EUROSION study) • To be included as funding priorities

  12. DG ENV – cross-cutting principles for NSRFs and OPs • Article 6 of Treaty of European Union – environment as a cross-cutting principle with a view to promoting sustainable development • Respect of environmental acquis • Ensure NSRFs refer to 6th EAP and SDS • Regional Agenda 21 – regional sustainable development • Partnership principle - environmental partners (authorities and NGOs involved in all stages) • Selection criteria – Bonuses, Integrated Product Policy, green public procurement, sustainable construction • Evaluation requirements – SEA and EIA Directives • Indicators • Environmental capacity building • Environmental networks, Theme Managers • Synergies with other Community co-financing • To be mentioned in the NSRFs and/or OPs

  13. The SEA Directive (2001/42/EC) and the future Cohesion Policy • Report due to Council and EP on relationship between SEA Directive and Community co-financing, December 2005 (Art. 12(4)) • Commission Methodological Working Paper on –to be discussed with MSs on Ex-Ante Evaluation 18-19.07.05 contains annex on SEA • Interreg IIIC (south-west UK led) Greening Regional Development Programmes (GRDP) SEA Handbook – to be discussed 18.07.05 and at ENEA Plenary 12.09.05

  14. SEA and the new Regulations – does SEA apply in principle? • Current exclusion for Structural Funds and EAGGF (Art. 3(9)) not extended to the next programming period • Plans and programmes co-financed by the European Community are included in the scope of the SEA Directive (art. 2) • SEA will be applicable to plans / programmes drawn up under the new Regulations as to any other plan and programme

  15. SEA and the new Regulations – to what will SEA apply? • Plans and programmes co-financed under new Regulations will have to be checked against the Directive’s « tests » (Art. 2, definition of plan/ programme and Art. 3, scope) • If they meet all criteria, they will have to be subject to SEA

  16. SEA - an important message • The SEA Directive invites to avoid duplication of assessment, e.g. for plans which form part a hierarchy • When deciding on the « scope » of the assessment, consider at what stage and level of the decision-making process the assessment should be best carried out • Information obtained at other levels in the decision-making process / through other EC legislation may be used

  17. European Network of Environmental Authorities for the Cohesion Policy (ENEA) • Composed of EU Member States (mainly environmental ministries), environmental NGOs, international organisations (Regional Environmental Center (REC), EEA, GRDP and Commission services (REGIO, ENV, EMPL, TREN, etc.) • Meetings 08.09.04, 28.02.05, 12.09.05 • Website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/integration/structural_funds_en.htm

  18. Conclusion: overall message Mutual beneficial relationship between cohesion and environmental policies: 1) Environment can be co-financed under all proposed Objectives - Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment & Cooperation • Cohesion policy finances environmental infrastructure and improvements • Environment is a key factor of competitiveness – employment, investment, attractive environment (renewed Lisbon Strategy) 2) Compliance with EC environmental legislation can ensure sustainability

  19. Thank you for your attention!

More Related