610 likes | 763 Views
April 9, 2010. Two Pells in One Award Year. Fred Sellers Office of Postsecondary Education. Agenda. Legislation and negotiated rulemaking Basics on crossover payment periods 2009-2010 award year 2010-2011 and subsequent award years Summer 2010
E N D
April 9, 2010 Two Pells in One Award Year Fred Sellers Office of Postsecondary Education
Agenda • Legislation and negotiated rulemaking • Basics on crossover payment periods • 2009-2010 award year • 2010-2011 and subsequent award years • Summer 2010 • Additional provisions starting in 2010-2011
Budget: Scheduled Award • FY 2009 (2009-2010) • Maximum Scheduled Award: $5,350 • FY 2010 (2010-2011) • Maximum Scheduled Award: $5,550 • SAFRA: change in minimum award calculation
Legislation • Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 Pub. L. 110-315 (effective 2009-2010) • Eligibility for a second Scheduled Award in an award year • Must be in a program leading to associate degree, baccalaureate degree, or certificate • Must be attending at least half-time in order to receive any of second Scheduled Award
Negotiated rulemaking • Team V-General and Nonloan Programmatic Issues met in March 2009, April 2009, and May 2009. • Negotiations included two Pells in one award year
Negotiated rulemaking • No consensus • Notice of proposed rulemaking: August 21, 2009 • Final regulations: October 29, 2009 • Effective starting in 2010-11 • Early implementation
Crossover payment period • Is a payment period that includes June 30 and July 1, i.e., a payment period that occurs in two award years • May be a term or a nonterm payment period • Must be assigned to one award year • Must have valid SAR/ISIR for assigned year • May assign two consecutive crossover payment periods to the same award year • Through 2009-2010 award year, have always been able to assign to either award year
Crossover payment period Example • A program has a semester calendar with two summer sessions (6/1 – 7/14 and 7/20 – 8/28). • If combined in one term, the combined term is a crossover payment period regardless of what classes students attend. • If the two sessions are considered separate terms, only the 6/1 – 7/14 term is a crossover payment period. • Note: if the two sessions are separate terms • Full-time must be 12 hours for each session to use Pell Formula 1 • Without a single summer term, the program may no longer qualify to use an SAY for Stafford/PLUS loans.
Crossover payment period and packaging • Raises packaging issues • Must use same EFC, COA, and need for all programs except Pell • Treat Pell as estimated financial assistance (EFA) for other Title IV • For Pell, use EFC for the award year from which the student will be paid
Crossover payment period and packaging EXAMPLE • Summer term normally assigned as last payment period of award year. • Institution decides to pay 2010 summer Pell from 2010-11 ISIR. • Use 2010-11 ISIR/EFC for Pell • Use 2009-10 ISIR/EFC for packaging all other aid • Amount of Pell received is applied as EFA to determine need for other Title IV.
Crossover payment period • These requirements are not new. • The new “two Pell” requirements are in addition to these requirements. • For example, if you have no summer crossover payment period, the “two Pell” requirements still apply to the rest of an award year.
2009-2010 Implementation • No regulations for 2009-2010 • Legally supportable ways to implement in ED: staff conference presentations, FSA Handbook, and new final regulations
2009-2010 Implementation • Term-based program: no requirement that a student must− • Complete the hours of the first academic year to be eligible, or • Be taking hours attributable to the second academic year to be eligible • Clock-hour or nonterm credit-hour program: a payment period requirement that student must complete the hours of an academic year to move to eligibility for a second Scheduled Award due to payment period definition
2009-2010 Payments • School determines payment for each payment period • Calculation is based on Scheduled Award for the award year • Pell Grant formulas have not changed • Each calculation is done using same amount for Scheduled Award
2009-2010 Payments • Must pay an eligible student until reach 200 percent of his or her Scheduled Award for the award year • Can begin paying from 2nd award while paying balance of 1st award if at least half-time student
Credit-hour example Summer 2009 ¾ time (6 hr)$1,875 Fall 2009 Full-time (6 hr)$2,500 Spring 2010 Full-time (12 hr)$2,500 Summer 2010 Full-time (12 hr)$2,500 • $5,000 Scheduled Award for 2009-10 • Summer 09 and Fall • Paid on ¾ time and full-time enrollment • Earns only 6 semester hours each term • Spring, receives payment from first and second Scheduled Awards • $ 625 1st award • $1,875 2nd award 2009-10 Award Year operationally transparent
Clock-hour example 1st P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it$2500 2nd P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it$2500 3rd P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2500 4th P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2500 • $5,000 Scheduled Award for 2009-10 • 1,800 clock-hour program with all payment periods in the 2009-2010 award year 2009-10 Award Year
Two Pells: COD • Added new field in COD Common Record • Additional Eligibility Indicator (AEI) • Set AEI to “true” when awarding funds from the student’s second Scheduled Award • Track the 200 percent limit in COD • With AEI set, is no POP MRR but concurrent enrollment MRR is still triggered if enrollment dates were within 30 days
AEI: COD screen Additional Eligibility Indicator Checkbox
Reminders for 2009-2010 • Must pay eligible students, including less-than-half-time for first Scheduled Award • Never had concept of headers and trailers; can choose award year to pay a crossover payment • Cannot ignore payment periods, for example, crossovers or intersessions: • Must pay eligible students in any payment period in an award year • Must implement “two Pells” regardless of software capabilities, even if requires manual interventions for crossover or other payment periods
Two Pells: Final regulations • Must be used starting in the 2010-2011 award year • May apply in some instances to summer crossover payment period considered to be in 2009-2010 §§690.63, 690.64, 690.67
Policy goals • Accelerating completion • Maximizing the benefit of a second Scheduled Award • Must attend full-time, or almost full-time, to receive significant benefit • Applying student achievement and accountability principles for use of funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Basics: Eligible student • Is enrolled in credit or clock hours attributable to a student’s second academic year in the award year • Is enrolled in an eligible program leading to a bachelor’s or associate degree or other recognized educational credential • The program must be greater than one academic year in length to be an eligible program for a second Scheduled Award. • An exception to the degree or certificate is provided for students with intellectual disabilities. • Is enrolled at least as a half-time student §690.67(a) Subpart O of part 668
Basics: Payment calculations • Use same amount for both Scheduled Awards in the award year • Calculate payment for each payment period • Have been no changes to the formulas to calculate payments
Basics: Disbursements • Disburse to eligible students until reach 200 percent of the student’s Scheduled Award for the award year • Can begin disbursing from second Scheduled Award in a payment period while paying the balance of first award if student qualifies for second award §690.63(h)
Crossover payment period assignment • Must assign the payment period to the award year in which the student receives the greater payment • If assigned to first award year, must pay with first award year funds • If assigned to second award year must pay with second award year funds §690.64
Crossover payment period assignment • Must determine the greater payment based on all requirements that apply • Must not rely on EFC or Scheduled Award alone • If only have valid SAR/ISIR for one award year, must rely on that record • For example, that award year record is higher if, for the other award year— • No SAR/ISIR • Rejected SAR/ISIR without an EFC • Incomplete verification • May still need to pay on other year if receive a valid SAR/ISIR
Crossover payment period assignment EXAMPLE • $4,000 Scheduled Award for first award year and $5,000 Scheduled Award for second award year • Receipt of ISIR with a higher Scheduled Award for second award year after summer term is completed • Payment as full-time from first award year ($2,000) although student only completed the term as half-time • Higher payment remains the first award year payment since payment from second award year would be based on half-time, i.e., $1,250 (lump sum payment rule, §690.76(b))
Crossover payment period assignment • Must reassign if receive information that student would receive greater payment • within deadline date for the first award year (2010 crossover payment period, September 10, 2010) • May reassign if information received after initial deadline • but not later than the deadline date for administrative relief for the first award year (2010 crossover payment period, February 1, 2011)
Credit-hour example Summer 2010Full-time (12 hr) $2,000 Fall 2010 Full-time (12 hr)$2,000 Spring 2011 Full-time (12 hr)$2,000 • $4,000 Scheduled Award for 2010-11 • Fall, completes the hours of the first academic year • Spring, receives payment from second Scheduled Award 2010-11 Award Year
Credit-hour example Summer 2011 ¾ time (9 hr)$1,875 Fall 2011 Full-time (15 hr)$2,500 Spring 2012 Full-time (15 hr)$2,500 Summer 2012 Full-time (12 hr)$2,500 • $5,000 Scheduled Award for 2011-12 • Summer 2011 reassigned • Fall, completes the hours of the first academic year • Spring, receives payment from first and second Scheduled Awards • $ 625 1st award • $1,875 2nd award 2011-12 Award Year operationally transparent
Credit-hour example Fall 2012¾ time (9 hr) $1,500 Spring 2013 Full-time (12 hr)$2,000 Summer 2013 Full-time (12 hr)$2,000 • $4,000 Scheduled Award for 2012-13 • Spring, does not complete first academic year • Summer, eligible with payment of $500 from balance of first award and $1,500 from second award • May need to assign summer to 2013-2014 if a higher payment 2012-13 Award Year
Clock-hour example 1st P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it$2000 2nd P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2000 3rd P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2000 • $4,000 Scheduled Award for 2010-11 • 1,800 clock-hour program over 52 weeks of instructional time • 3rd payment period, a crossover payment period 2010-11 Award Year
Clock-hour example 3rd P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2500 4th P.P. 450 cl hr/13 wk it $2500 • $5,000 Scheduled Award for 2011-12 • Reassignment of 3rd payment period since student is now eligible for a $2,500 payment 2011-12 Award Year
Crossover payment period assignment for 2010 • Effective date of final regulations affects 2010 crossover period. • Institution may designate based on options applied to all students or on student-by-student basis.
Crossover payment period assignment for 2010 • Institution may designate: • Prior to July 1, 2010, a student’s payment period as being in the 2009-10 and not apply these regulations; • A student’s payment period as being in the 2009-10 award year with regulations being applicable; or • A student’s payment period as being in 2010-2011, in which case the regulations must apply. • Before July 1, 2010, establish written policy
Crossover payment period assignment for 2010 EXAMPLES • Prior to July 1, 2010, institution determines it will-- • Treat 2010 summer payment periods as being in 09-10 and not apply these regulations. • Prior to July 1, 2010, institution determines it will-- • Treat 2010 summer payment periods as being in 09-10 and not apply these regulations, but • Assign student’s payment period to 2010-2011 if the student would receive a larger payment
Crossover payment period assignment for 2010 EXAMPLES • Prior to July 1, 2010, an institution determines that it will-- • Treat 2010 summer payment periods as being in the 2010-2011 award year • Prior to July 1, 2010, an institution determines it will make 2010 summer payment period assignments on a case-by-case basis
Crossover payment period assignment for 2010 EXAMPLES • Prior to July 1, 2010, makes NO determination of policy to apply-- • Must apply new regulations to all summer disbursements, whether for 9-10 or 10-11 (does not affect 9-10 payment periods prior to summer 2010)
Transfer student • Final regulations: two options • Assumption method • Based on disbursements received • Hours-earned method • Based on actual hours earned • Method at option of institution: apply on a student-by-student basis or to all students §690.67(b)
Transfer student: Assumption method • Assume completed first academic year if received all of first Scheduled Award at prior institution • If less than first Scheduled Award, calculate hours considered to have completed: Amount disbursed at prior institution Hours in current institution’s academic year X Hours considered completed = Amount of Scheduled Award at prior institution
Transfer student: Assumption method EXAMPLE – credit hour • Fall transfer student received $2,000 of $4,000 Scheduled Award for summer at prior institution. • Current institution, without a summer term, defines academic year, in part, as 24 semester hours. • Hours in award year considered to have earned for prior attendance: $2,000 disbursed at prior institution 24 hours in current institution’s academic year X = 12 hours considered completed $4,000 Scheduled Award at prior institution
Transfer student: Assumption method EXAMPLE – clock hour • Transfer student received $3,000 of $4,000 Scheduled Award at prior institution. • Current institution defines academic year, in part, as 900 clock hours. • Hours in award year considered to have earned for prior attendance: $3,000 disbursed at prior institution 900 clock hours in current institution’s academic year X = 675 clock hours considered completed $4,000 Scheduled Award at prior institution
Transfer student: Assumption method • Round down any fractions of a credit or clock hour • Except if courses are offered in fractions of credits, may retain fractions • Example • Using the assumption method, a transfer student is considered to have earned 12.7 credits in the award year at a prior institution. • If the student’s program is offered in courses of 2.5 credit hours, the institution may consider the student to have 12.7 credits or 12 credits. • If the program were offered in 3-hour courses, the student would have 12 credits.