1 / 23

COST 286 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) in Diffused Communication Systems

COST 286 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) in Diffused Communication Systems Hamburg , 25th-26th November, 2004. Research on simulating radiowave propagation in closed environments. Kamil Staniec. Wroclaw University of Technology Institute of Telecommunication s and Acoustics

Download Presentation

COST 286 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) in Diffused Communication Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COST 286 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) in Diffused Communication Systems Hamburg, 25th-26th November, 2004 Research on simulating radiowave propagation in closed environments Kamil Staniec Wroclaw University of Technology Institute of Telecommunications and Acoustics Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław Poland e-mail: kamil.staniec@pwr.wroc.pl

  2. Technological congestion 1/21

  3. Current measurements – mixed configurations • 802.11b - 802.11g (interference) • 802.11a - 802.11b/g (no interference) • Bluetooth - 802.11b/g (interference) 2/21

  4. Existing indoor propagation models • 1. Statistical models: • 1.1 Amplitude distribution • 1.2 Phase distribution • 1.3 Angle-of-arrival distribution • 2. Empirical models • 2.1 ITU-R P.1238: • 2.2 Multilayer model: FAF = 15+(510)*k [dB] 3/21

  5. Indoor propagation effects 4/21 [modified 3]

  6. Multipath propagation 5/21

  7. Advantages of using ray tracing method: imitates radiowave propagation 6/21

  8. Advantages of using ray tracing method: easy generation of any antenna patterns patterns drawn with 642 rays 7/21

  9. Advantages of using ray tracing method: radio channel power delay time profile 8/21

  10. Indoor propagation – challenges to be solved • Common assumptions in existing RT model: • constant wall attentuation (irrespective of material electric parameters) • walls/partitions perfectly thin • presence of objects/persons not considered 9/21

  11. Research – our objectives • Create exact analytical model that includes: • persons/objects • „thick” walls • variable attenuation of partitions • radio channel time-dispersion characteristics 10/21

  12. X-section of a partition wall 11/21

  13. Multilayer structure – influence of innacurate electric parameters 12/21

  14. Multilayer structure – wall attenuation vs. incidence angle 13/21

  15. Multilayer structure – EM wave attenuation vs. frequency 14/21

  16. Thick / thin walls modeling 15/21

  17. Analytical calculation of multilayer wall attenuation 16/21

  18. Simulated environment (example) Thick walls with persons (yellow) andobjects (green) 17/21

  19. Optimisation 1: Environment prescanning 18/21

  20. Optimisation 2: look-up table in variable attenuation calculations 19/21

  21. State of research: • Environment database preprocessing accomplished: • available modes: • perfectly thin walls • actually thick walls • inclusion of persons • inclusion of furniture • variable walls attenuation w/r to frequency, incidence angle, polarization (database storage) • Preliminary ray tracing for „full” ray tracing optimisation purposes (av. 95% time saving) 20/21

  22. Possible applications: • e-field distribution maps in a closed environment (SOHO, vehicles, railway tunnels) • information on radio channel dispersiveness - Power Delay Profile /available for each pixel/ • modeling mutual AP’s interference 21/21

  23. THANK YOU

More Related