200 likes | 540 Views
Atmospheric Sub-micron Aerosol Organic: Results from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry. Douglas R. Worsnop, John Jayne, Manjula Canagaratna, Tim Onasch, Hacene Boudries, Leah Williams Aerodyne Research, Inc. Jose Jimenez , Qi Zhang, Peter DeCarlo, Alex Huffman, Alice Delia University of Colorado
E N D
Atmospheric Sub-micron Aerosol Organic: Results from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry Douglas R. Worsnop, John Jayne, Manjula Canagaratna, Tim Onasch, Hacene Boudries, Leah Williams Aerodyne Research, Inc. Jose Jimenez , Qi Zhang, Peter DeCarlo, Alex Huffman, Alice Delia University of Colorado Rami Alfarra, James Allan, Keith Bower, Hugh Coe UMIST Ann Middlebrook Jay Slowik, Paul Davidovits NOAA Boston College Frank Drewnick, Johannes Schneider Silke Weimer, Ken Demerjian MPI Mainz SUNY Albany European Monitoring and Evaluation Program (EMEP) Workshop on Particulate Matter (PM) Measurement United Nations Economic Commission for Europe New Orleans, Wednesday, April 21, 2004
Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) Particle Aerodynamic Sizing Particle Beam Composition Generation Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer Chopper Thermal Vaporization & Electron Impact Ionization TOF Region Aerodynamic Lens (2 Torr) Turbo Pump Turbo Pump Turbo Pump Particle Inlet (1 atm) 100% transmission (60-600 nm), aerodynamic sizing, linear mass signal. Jayne et al., Aerosol Science and Technology 33:1-2(49-70), 2000. Jimenez et al., Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D7), 8425, doi:10.1029 / 2001JD001213, 2003.
AMS:Size Resolved Chemical Composition of Sub-micron aerosol (PM1) Non-refractory (NR) composition (thermal vaporization at 600C) e.g. no black carbon (BC), dust or (typically) seasalt Electron Impact (EI) Mass Spectrometry – quantitative mass loading All NR components detected with little uncertainty direct calibration / chemically unbiased sample Mass spectrum of inorganics and organics easy to separate Analysis of organic matter (OM) – primary vs secondary hydrocarbon (lube oil) vs oxidized (HULIS) direct measure of OM/OC ratio Aerodynamic focusing and sizing collection efficiency 1 for aspherical particles; e.g. (NH4)2SO4 measure CE with beam width probe – particle shape information aerodynamic (AMS) + mobility (SMPS) sizing particle mass, density, shape and fractal dimension + chemistry
Mass balance –TEOM, PILS, OC/EC Organic classification: primary vs oxidized OM/OC ratio Sizing – comparison with SMPS ( and Moudi) small, fractal organic vs mixed organic/sulfate accumulation dirunal and seasonal patterns compare to vehicle and dynometer emissions Future: ToF-AMS, higher sensitivity (aircraft time response) and single particle composition “cheaper, simpler” Q-AMS system hour time resolution size binning (<100nm, 100-200 nm, > 200 nm)
Real Time Chemical and Physical Composition of Aerosols Aerosol Sampling Sampling frequency - >10Hz Real-time measurement. AMS Nitrate Sulphate Ammonium Alkanes Organics Aromatics Etc.. Mass distribution Chemical composition
Mass Loading A (MWA/IEA) Ion Signal ai Calibration Factor * (MWNO3/IENO3) EI Ionization: A + e- ----> A+ ----> ai+ EI Ionization Cross Sections
Group Molecule/Species Ion Fragments Mass Fragments Water H2O H2O+ , HO+ , O+18,17, 16 Ammonium NH3 NH3+, NH2+, NH+ 17, 16, 15 Nitrate HNO3 HNO3+, NO2+, NO+ 63, 46, 30 Sulfate H2SO4 H2SO4+, HSO3+, SO3+ 98, 81, 80 SO2+, SO+64, 48 Organic CnHmOy H2O+, CO+, CO2+ 18, 28, 44 (Oxygenated)H3C2O+, HCO2+, Cn’Hm+ 43, 45, ... Organic CnHm Cn’Hm’+27,29,41,43,55,57,69,71... (hydrocarbon) e- e- e- e- e- e- MS Signatures for Aerosol Species Identification color coded to match spectra Standard electron impact ionization @ 70 eV Easy to quantify: ca. NIST MS library Easy to separate inorganic and organic components Speciation of organic composition is challenging
Comparison of PMTACS’01and PMTACS’04 Time Series, Diurnal Plots, and Data Diagnostics Silke Weimer+, Frank Drewnick‡, Doug Worsnop*, Ken Demerjian+ + Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, Albany/NY, ‡ MPI for Chemistry, Mainz; *Aerodyne Res. Inc./Billerica/MA
Mass Balance AMS vs.TEOM Speciated Mass, Queens, NY The “Other” Category -PM1 vs PM2.5 -elemental carbon -crustal oxides Drewnick et al, 2003 F. Drewnick, J. Schwab, K. Demerjian ASRC SUNY Albany
WINTER Comparison of FDMS and AMS, PMTACS04 PRELIMINARY AMS/FDMS ~ 0.7 for AMS Particle Collection Efficiency: CE = 0.5 FDMS – Dirk Felton, NYSDEC
10 minute data in PMTACS04 PRLIMINARY ESTIMATED Primary organic Oxidized organic Plumes of primary organic are clearly observed - due to vehicles driving by the site (frequency increased after college re-opened in last week of study) Weimer, Drewnick et al
Organic Mass Spectra e- CnHm ----> Cn’Hm’+ 27, 29, 41, 43, 55, 57,69, 71, ... C4H9+ e- CnHmOy ----> H2O+ CO+ CO2+ C2H3O+ 18 28 44 43 27, 29, 55, …. Following flash vaporization at ~600C
Diurnal Cycles of OM Classes Weimer, Drewnick et al Summer 57 – primary marker Winter 44 – oxidized marker
Aerosol Size-Resolved Composition with the Aerodyne AMS in PittsburghJose-Luis Jimenez*, Qi Zhang, Manjula Canagaratna, John Jayne, Doug Worsnop, Charles Stanier, Spyros Pandis*Dept. Chemistry & CIRESUniversity of Colorado at BoulderEPA Supersite MeetingFeb. 26, 2004
Diesel Vehicle Exhaust Primary Organic Component in Pittsburgh Zhang, Jimenez et al. Jayne, Canagaratna et al.
Oxidized Organic Component in Pittsburgh Zhang, Jimenez et al. Fulvic Acid “HULIS” ???? Rami Alfarra et al (UMIST)
Total Organics Quantitation vs. Sunset Labs OC Pittsburgh “Super Site” OM / OC ~ 1.7 Total Organic = C (all organic ions) Qi Zhang, Jose Jimenez, CU
FUTURE IDEAS lower cost “Cheaper” AMS – smaller, no fast electronics, limited size binning approaching cost and operational equivalent of RGA or GCMS simple calibration system? cost equivalent to collection of individual continuous instruments add thermal denuder to evaluate semivolatile component Aerosol Collection (with aerodynamic lens) (Paul Ziemann) – in situ (EI) mass spectrometric analysis - separation via volatility aerosol collection (< 1 hour) [ Hacene Boudries ] for direct injection into speciation detectors e.g. GCMS, PTRMS
Aerodyne Doug Worsnop John Jayne Manjula Canagaratna Hacene Boudries Tim Onasch Phil Mortimer Leah Williams Boston College Jay Slowik Paul Davidovits Arizona State Jonathan Allen Utah State Phil Silva JAPAN Nobu Tagekawa (Tokyo) Yutake Kondo (Tokyo) Akinori Takami (NIES) Akio Shimono (Sanyu) Ken-ichi Akiyama (JARI) Boulder Jose Jimenez (UC) Alice Delia, Darren Toohey Ann Middlebrook(NOAA) Qi Zhang, Peter Decarlo (UC) Alex Huffman, Katja Dzepina Caltech John Seinfeld, Rick Flagan Roya Bahreini Environment Canada Shao Meng Li, Jeff Brook Kathy Hayden, Gang Lu, Richard Leaitch SUNY Albany Ken Demerjian Wyoming Peter Liu Derek Montague PNNL / BNL Carl Berkowitz, Pete Daum Acknowledgments UMIST Hugh Coe Keith Bower Paul Williams James Allen Rami Alfarra MPI Mainz Frank Drewnick Johannes Schneider Stephan Borrmann Joachim Curtius CEH (Edinburgh) Eiko Nemitz David Anderson KFA Juelich Thomas Mentel Andreas Wahner MIT Xuefeng Zhang Ken Smith TOFWERK Marc Gonin Katrin Fuhrer Support: NSF, ONR, DoE EPA, NASA, NOAA, JARI Environment Canada