100 likes | 209 Views
Logframe. Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu. Adjustments - Logframe. Logical Framework: In most of cases needs the improvement!!! Work with the Applicant on it – to make it consistent with the Description of the Action
E N D
Logframe ConsultationseminaronthepreparationoffullApplicationFormfor LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu
Adjustments - Logframe • Logical Framework: • In most of cases needs the improvement!!! • Work with the Applicant on it – to make it consistent with the Description of the Action • Ideally a contract to be signed with a proper Logical framework: • It will help to the Applicant and partners in Action’s implementation • Will serve to the monitoring purposes • But keeping it aside the contract and still using for monitoring purpose could also be an option
Logframe • A different, ”third” logic of working! • Identify which parts of the AForm corresponds to each level of the Logframe • Start from Results and Outputs • The most important part, usually more or less well formulated • To be checked against AForm, formulations adjusted if needed • Normally shouldn’t change during the project implementation, whereas Activities could be adjusted • How do you reflect Outputs, which are not in the Logframe but are undispensable to formulate the Results?
Logframe • When the results are formulated, check the Activities, which contribute to them (passing by Outputs) • Make sure that all the activities are attributed to a Result • The Activities are sufficient to achieve the results • Check that indicators are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) • Realistic indicators • Check sources of verification... • Risks/assumptions very important! • Ex: reducing polution of the river by 20%, but it’s poluted upstream
Logframe - verification • Is the vertical logic complete and accurate? • Are the indicators and sources of verification available and reliable? • Are assumptions and preconditions realistic? • Are risks acceptable? • Is the probability of achieving the objectives high? • Are programme principles taken into account? (cross-border impact, equal opportunities, etc.) • Are the expenses justified by the expected benefits?
FurtherInformation JOINT TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT Phone: +371 6750 9520 Fax: +371 67509523 E-mail: info@estlatrus.eu Ausekļa Street 14 – 3rd Floor, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia