200 likes | 218 Views
Understanding Observational and Interview Research. Kyle Sharp A ED 615 November 6, 2006. Observation Research. Can you think of an everyday example of when observation is used?. Isn’t observational research simple?. There are many different types of observational research.
E N D
Understanding Observational and Interview Research Kyle Sharp A ED 615 November 6, 2006
Observation Research • Can you think of an everyday example of when observation is used?
Isn’t observational research simple? • There are many different types of observational research. • Each type has a different level of researcher involvement. • As diagram 1 shows the level of interaction decreases from participant observation to complete observer. • Also see figure 19.1 on page 451 for more detail. Diagram 1
Is the researcher involved in the activity? • Participant observer: the observer participates fully in the activity and often times does not let others know they are doing research. • Participant as an observer: the researcher participates fully in the activity but lets those involved know they are doing research.
When its time to dig in and not get your hands dirty. • Observer as a participant: the researcher identifies themselves as such but does not actively participate in the activity. • Complete Observer: the researcher does not participate in the activity on any level and often times does not identify themselves as such.
Other types of observation • Naturalistic • Observing activity as it happens naturally. • Simulations • The observer gives instructions on what to do but not how to do it.
What are the problems with observational research? • Observer Effect: • Study participants will act differently knowing they are being studied. • Observer Bias: • Researchers are people too.
When should I use observation? • What are you looking for? • Can you observe what you are looking for? • Is the topic too sensitive? • DO YOU HAVE THE TIME TO CARRY OUT THE RESEARCH?
Can I ask you a few questions? • Interview Research is used to gather information from specific people. • Types of interviews: • Informal Interviews are similar to a regular conversation with little structure or specific questions. • Semi structured interviews have a set questionnaire to guide the interview • Structure interviews are very formal where a questionnaire is used to conduct the research with little deviation. Figure 2 shows the level of structure form greatest to least starting at the bottom
What about looking back? • Retrospective interviews can be any of the previously mentioned forms of interview but are unique because it relies upon the recollections of study participants which can be skewed.
Interview questions • Seek demographic information about the study participant. • i.e. age, gender, race, socioeconomic……. • Informational questions seek to establish the level of knowledge of interviewee. • Other questions can include subjects involving feelings, opinions, and experiences.
How do you probe properly? • Open ended questions • These questions give the study participant the ability to give information openly without direction. Can be hard to properly construct • Closed ended questions • Yes or no questions. Give little information to the interviewer.
Weaknesses of interview research • Conversational interviews can yield great amounts of information, but it is different in each interview. What difficulty would this cause? • Data analysis and organization can be difficult.
Weakness of interview research • Guided interviews can be more uniform, but flexibility can still yield different information from each interview. What problem would this cause? • Comparability of results is still very limited.
Weakness of interview research • Structured interviews offer limits the interviewer to tailor each interview to the study participant. How could word for word asking of questions limit the effectiveness of interviews? • The natural flow and comfort of the interview setting can be compromised.
Reliability and validity • Instrumentation contributes to the reliability and validity of the interview process. • Interviewer training and elimination of biases are also important to accuracy and repeatability of the interview process.
Article • Pompper, D., Adams, J., (2006), Under the microscope: Gender and mentor-protégé relationships. Public Relations Review, 32, 309-315 • To explain factors of a successful mentoring program as well as successful strategies to maximize the mentoring experience. • 40 interviews were conducted to gather information needed about mentoring relationships. • It was concluded from the interviews that mentorship's can be beneficial and there are distinct gender dynamics in those relationships.
References • Frankel, J., Wallen, N. (2006). Validity and Reliability. In How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed., pp. 151, 155-156), Boston, McGraw Hill • Pompper, D., Adams, J., (2006), Under the microscope: Gender and mentor-protégé relationships. Public Relations Review, 32, 309-315 • http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Brown/lauratp.htm
Thank you for your time!!! Any questions???