1 / 5

Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry

Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry. Ryan R. Bailey, MSOT, OTR/L; Catherine E. Lang, PT, PhD. Aim Characterize hours of upper-limb (UL) activity. Examine potential modifying factors of UL activity:

alia
Download Presentation

Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Upper-limb activity in adults: Referent values using accelerometry Ryan R. Bailey, MSOT, OTR/L; Catherine E. Lang, PT, PhD

  2. Aim • Characterize hours of upper-limb (UL) activity. • Examine potential modifying factors of UL activity: • Sedentary activity, cognitive impairment, depression, comorbidities, cohabitation status, age. • Relevance • Capacity for UL function may not translate into real-world activity; therefore, activity should also be assessed together with clinical measures of capacity. • Accelerometry can quantify UL activity outside clinic.

  3. Method • 74 community-dwelling adults: • Wore accelerometers on bilateral wrists for 25 h. • Provided information on modifying factors.

  4. Results • Dominant UL activity duration: • Mean 9.1 ± 1.9 h. • Ratio of activity between nondominant and dominant ULs: • 0.95 ± 0.06 h. • Decreased hours of dominant UL activity associated with increased time spent in sedentary activity. • No other factors associated with hours of dominant UL activity.

  5. Conclusion • These data can help clinicians: • Establish outcome goals for patients given preimpairment level of sedentary activity. • Track progress during UL rehabilitation.

More Related