90 likes | 203 Views
MICE Target Modelling. Ben Shepherd February 2011. 2D Modelling. A 2d axisymmetric model takes seconds to run (compared to hours for a 3d model) Limitations: PMs modelled as rings (not 8 wedges) Can’t introduce an offset. 3D and 2D models. Results – 2D model.
E N D
MICE Target Modelling Ben Shepherd February 2011
2D Modelling • A 2d axisymmetric model takes seconds to run(compared to hours for a 3d model) • Limitations: • PMs modelled as rings (not 8 wedges) • Can’t introduce an offset
Results – 2D model y is the distance between bottom edge of PM and bottom edge of coils Force evaluated at r = 8mm, 0.5mm away from PM outer edge Maximum force: 52.0N at y=9mm
Effect of increasing PM size PM outer radius: 7.5mm PM outer radius: 8.6mm
PM size variation results 15mm diameter 16mm diameter: 22% increase (52.0N 63.5N) PS claims a 6% increase in mass (here, page 14) but I’m not sure of the derivation
Effect of increasing coil size Coil outer radius: 15mm Coil outer radius: 25mm
Coil size variation results We see a ‘saturation’ effect at large radii Force is increased by 18% at r = 25mm (relative to 15mm)
Adding steel bobbin • Added steel cylinder (0.3mm thick) to inside of coils • Shunts some of the field produced by the coils • Reduces force by ~33% • (In reality, mild steel used with low µ - so would be OK)