180 likes | 364 Views
JRATS Post MS B R&D Contract Proposal (Nominal Structure). Introduction. Section 1: Performance. Performance. - Seek and Destroy: + # Runs That Target was destroyed
E N D
Performance - Seek and Destroy: + # Runs That Target was destroyed + Average Time for 4 runs: (2-active; 2-passive) + Average Health for 4 runs:(2-active; 2-passive) - Mine detection + Average Time for 2 runs + # Mine Detonations (2 runs) - Interop + # Runs that Target was Destroyed + Average Time for 4 runs: (2-active; 2-passive) + Average Healthfor 4 runs:(2-active; 2-passive) - Design Strengths
Producibility/Supportability/Deployability Producibility Index (PI) Logistics Supportability Index (LSI) Deployability Index (DI)
Test schedule for System Demonstration effort (from MS B to MS C) and LRIP effort (MS C to FRPDR) DT&E OT&E LFT&E Interoperability Technical - Test and Evaluation
Past Performance Risk Not played – all proposals will receive a rating of Low Riskfor this subfactor
Based on: JUGV Design/Performance Producibility –Supportability -Deployability JRATS T&E Schedule Cost Risk & Mitigation Proposal Risk (Integrated Risk Assessment)
Post MS B R&D Contract Target Price (next chart) JUGV Life Cycle Cost (< $3.5B) JUGV Unit Procurement Cost (<$620K) Software Development/Integration Cost (also shown on contract target price chart) Cost
Target Cost: H/W $___ S/W Dev/Int $___ General Risk Factor $___ TOTAL $___ TargetProfit: $__ Target Price: $__ Ceiling Price: $___ Share Line: 60/40 PTA: $___ Contract Price