290 likes | 507 Views
PPL 20 Unit #3. Discussing Conflict Resolution Anger Management. OBJECTIVES. Demonstrate understanding of the varied dynamics of conflict (eg. Context, escalators, perception) Describe different strategies to handle conflict
E N D
PPL 20 Unit #3 Discussing Conflict Resolution Anger Management
OBJECTIVES • Demonstrate understanding of the varied dynamics of conflict (eg. Context, escalators, perception) • Describe different strategies to handle conflict • Describe the impact of non-verbal (eg. Body language) and verbal responses • Benefits of developing anger management strategies • Techniques for dealing with angry disputants
Video: Argument C:\Documents and Settings\John Cowan\My Documents\Downloads\Free YouTube Downloader\Argument Clinic.wmv
Conflict In your own words define the term conflict. n a fight; a contest; strife, quarrel; emotional disturbance A perceived incompatibility of actions, is an almost [unavoidable] part of social relations.
Types of Conflict • Internal – conflict with oneself • Inter personal – conflict with another person • Intra group – conflict in a group • Inter group – conflict with another group • For each type of conflict give one example for each.
Causes of Conflict Elements of conflict are much the same involving individuals, groups or nations. Social traps – self serving behaviour when both parties pursue self-interest and mistrust one another Misperceptions – see one’s own group as moral and one’s opposition different which fully justify whatever one does to retaliate
Response to Conflict Avoidance denial, attempts to please others at his/her expense, postpone, chance, humour, reject, non-communication, change the subject
Response to Conflict Confrontation aggression, win at all costs, criticism, manipulation, bullying, distortion, pressure
Response to Conflict Resolution share, compromise, get help, apologize, discussion, humour, problem solve, I-messages, active listening
What is conflict resolution? • Characterized by cooperation, communication and conciliation [healing]
Cooperation • Parties that used isolation and competition strategies to make strangers into enemies • Cooperative efforts to achieve goals that override differences break down barriers between people when presented with a shared predicament • Positive attitudes towards one another
Communication • People unable to communicate with one another become distrustful • Communication to discuss the dilemna to negotiate a commitment to cooperate and facilitates understanding
Conciliation • One side announces its intent to reduce tensions and initiates one or small appeasing act which opens the door for the enemy to reciprocate • Increasing trust and cooperation • Examples – smile, a small apology maybe all that is needed for both people to reduce the tension
Behaviour Which Helps Diffuse Conflict • Eye contact • Positive choice of words • Effective listening • I- messages • Calm demeanor
Eye Contact • Culturally sensitive • Eye contact connects with the other person
Effective Listening • Listen to the full message without interrupting • Paraphrase • Look for signs of understanding – nod of the head, smile
I - Message • F – Feelings – take ownership of your feelings by using I – nobody can disagree that you’re disappointed, mad, happy • B – Behaviour – the behaviour of the other person that has made you feel the way you are feeling • O – Outcome – from the person’s behaviour it has impacted on you
Calm Demeanor • Breathing technique – deep breathing to help relax the body • Cool down period prior to communication • Collect your thoughts
Anger Management Strategies • Physical activity • Sense of humour • Deep breathing • Planning – pro-active vs reactive
Class Discussion • Students will identify and discuss the benefits of anger management.
Handling Angry Disputants • Ignore • Laugh • Apologize • Count to ten • Deep breathing technique • Reframe the situation • Self talk • Body language • Self worth is intact
Mediator • A neutral third party who helps the participants works things out
Adjudicator • A neutral party listens to both sides then makes a judgment on the information presented