320 likes | 466 Views
Results from the ATLAS experiment. Introduction LHC and ATLAS in 2010 The LHC physics landscape ATLAS results …from common to rare processes QCD and jet physics, W/Z/photons, top, SUSY and Higgs searches
E N D
Results from the ATLAS experiment • Introduction • LHC and ATLAS in 2010 • The LHC physics landscape • ATLAS results …from common to rare processes • QCD and jet physics, W/Z/photons, top, SUSY and Higgs searches • Rediscovering the Standard Model, challenging theoretical predictions, looking for surprises • Can only cover a fraction of the results, and not touch all topics • Some will be covered in more detail by later ATLAS talks • Much more at https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic Richard Hawkings (CERN / ATLAS collaboration) XXIX Workshop on Recent Advances in Particle Physics and Cosmology, Patras, Greece, 14/4/11 Richard Hawkings
LHC and ATLAS running in 2010 • Main LHC goals for 2010 • Commission machine at 7 TeV step-by-step • Stored energy in beam beyond 1MJ (beyond HERA, Tevatron, potential for damage from uncontrolled losses) • Up to 100s bunches per beam, bunch trains • Deliver data to experiments – commissioning detectors and first physics results • Alternating periods of commissioning/data-taking • Aimed to get to L=1032 cm-2s-1 by end 2010 • Achieved – got to ~2 1032 cm-2s-1 and 48 pb-1 total • Also a short Heavy Ion (Pb+Pb) run at end • ATLAS goals for 2010 • Commission the detector, trigger and computing • Understand the detector performance • ‘Rediscover’ the Standard Model and take first steps into new territory • For both precision physics and searches Richard Hawkings
The LHC physics landscape • LHC detectors looking for needles in haystacks • Rare processes hiding in an overwhelming background of ‘bread and butter’ physics • Rates for some SM processes at nominal LHC performance – 14 TeV and L=1034 cm-2s-1 • Early work: understanding these ‘backgounds’ • Many interesting things to be learned on the way • Important for calibrating detectors LHC@7 Integrated luminosity / time Richard Hawkings
Initial running compared to Tevatron • Also much early ‘discovery potential’ • Rather than comparing with ultimate LHC performance, compare with Tevatron • Searches typically ~5 fb-1 at Ecm=1.96 TeV • Gain in energy (27 TeV) … • Loss in int. L (5-10 0.05-1 fb-1 in 2010-11) • Gain/loss depends on initial state (gg or qq) and required invariant mass MX • E.g. HWW at 160 GeV, gains factor ~15 from increased ECM (gg dominated) • E.g. ttbar production (X=2×175 GeV) gains a factor ~20, becomes gg dominated • E.g. 1 TeV Z’ (qq) gains factor ~100 • Plenty of potential for opening up new territory, even with 2010 dataset • See what has happened, starting from the highest cross-section processes W Stirling Richard Hawkings
Total inelastic cross-section measurement • Total cross-section for ppXY divided into • Dominant non-diffractive, colour flow between protons • Single (SD) and double-dissociative (DD) processes • Fractions of SD, DD model-dependent • (elastic contribution pppp) • Measure using MBTS scintillators • Front-face of endcap calo (2.1<|h|<3.4) • RSS=#(hit 1 side)/#(hit both sides) • Constraints f(SD+DD) in models – acceptance • Result 60.3±0.05(stat)±0.5(syst)±2.1(lumi) pb • For Mx/s>5 10-6 - can also extrapolate • Many other results on minimum bias events • Multiplicities and UE event studies (track,calo) Richard Hawkings
Measuring the luminosity • Cross-section measurements need int. luminosity • Relative luminosity as function of time from e.g. • LUCID – dedicated Cherenkov detectors 17m from IP • Hit counting and timing from MBTS scintiallators • Counting events with reconstructed primary vertex • Good consistency between them (0.5% over time) • Absolute calibration from van der Meer scans • Calculate instantaneous luminosity from LHC params • Beam sizes Sx and Sy • Measure from separation scan (vdM scan) • Total uncertainty of 3.4%, limited by bunch charge (3.1%) and shape of luminous region (0.9%) vdM scan Richard Hawkings
Hard QCD – jets studies • Jet production from quark and gluon scattering dominant high pT process • Now done for 20<pT<1500 GeV; |y|<4.4 • Good agreement with NLO QCD predictions • Many detailed studies – e.g. rapidity gaps • Study gap between two highest pT jets • Gap fraction – no third jet above pT>Q0 • Varying success of MC/calculations • Important for jet-veto studies in VBF Higgs Richard Hawkings
Highest pT jet event • Highest pT jet from 2010 data: pT=1.5 TeV (2nd jet 1.0 TeV) Richard Hawkings
Determination of jet energy scale • Jet energy scale uncertainty is critical • Very good understanding with 2010 data • Based on ‘single particle’ response in data • Measure E/p for tracks up to ~ 20 GeV • Translate to effects on jets using MC • Various uncertainties – noise modelling, dead material, MC modeling and tune • Valid for central region – transport to forward using dijet balance central/fwd jets • Validation comparing calibrated jets to various references ‘in-situ’ • Jet-photon direct balance: pT<250 GeV • Photon vs. missing ET (MPF) pT<250 GeV • High-pT jet vs. multi jets – pT up to ~1 TeV • Calorimeter vs. track jets up to ~1 TeV • Factor 2 better than in summer 2010 • Ultimate aim to get to ~1% Richard Hawkings
New physics in dijets? • Dijet events also used to search for new physics • Resonance in dijet mass: excited quarks (q*), axigluons, RS gravitons, quantum black holes • ‘BumpHunder’ used to search for narrow or wide resonances – nothing found • Limits: mq*, axigluon>2.1 TeV, QBH M>3.7 TeV • Also set model-independent limits for resonance • Information also from angular distribution • In QCD, t-channel gluon dominant, cos q*~1 • Gives flat distribution in c=exp(|y1-y2|) • Define F(c) fraction with c<3.32vs c<30, binned in dijet mass • Again set limits on additional contributions • e.g. contact interactions L>9.5 TeV (exp. 5.7) Richard Hawkings
b-flavoured jets • b-jet production – test of QCD pred. • 1st step to understanding Wbb, Zbb • Measure using b-jets selected with secondary vertex algorithm • Long lifetime/ high mass of b hadrons • Select displaced vertices and fit vertex mass to obtain b-fraction • Systematics from JES, b-tag efi • Data falls more quickly at high pT than POWHEG or PYTHIA predict Richard Hawkings
W and Z production • Dominant process with high-pT isolated leptons (e/m) • Wln - missing ET from undetected neutrino • Transverse mass gives clear peak around W mass • Zll – two high pT leptons – very clean signal • Now also using forward electrons in FCAL (2.5<|h|<4.9) – more challenging environment • 260k W and 25k Z observed in 2010 data • Experimental uncertainties 2-3% in measured region central-forward central-central Richard Hawkings
W / Z results • 5% uncertainties on s when extrapolating to full range • Compare with predictions – sensitive to PDFs at x≈10-2 • Good agreement for cross-sections (also W+ vs W-) and ratios • Further constraints on PDFs from W asymmetry • Ratio measurement – many systematics cancel • Crucial to control acceptance effects (e.g. trigger and recon biases) that are different for m+/m- • Redundant m measurements from inner detector and muon spectrometer help Richard Hawkings
Calibrating the detector with Zs • Large sample of Zee/mm used to calibrate • Z-mass very precisely known from LEP • Width of peak sensitive to detector resolution • Zmm closer to MC expectation after reprocessing data after end of 2010 LHC run • Zee statistics allow calorimeter calibration in 28 separate regions – good to 3% • Z-topology also used for ‘tag-and-probe’ • Measure lepton trigger and reconstruction efi • Very good agreement with MC expectations m efi Richard Hawkings
New physics in leptonic events? • Many models predict heavy bosons W’ or Z’ • W’-like objects would appear in tail of MT distrib with additional Jacobian peaks • Background dominated by tail of SM W - level sensitive to understanding of lepton pT and missing ET resolution at high pT • Z’-like objects would appear in tail of mll distrib • background dominated by SM Z/g* • No excess of events – limits from LHC now similar to or exceeding those from Tevatron Richard Hawkings
Diboson production • Can produce pairs of bosons (e.g. WW, WZ, ZZ, Wg, Zg) Richard Hawkings
WW and W/Z+g production • WW production sensitive to TGC vertex • Events characterised by 2 high-pT leptons, missing ET and low jet multiplicity • Low number of events due to Wen/mn BR • Measure sWW=40+20-16±7pb, agrees with SM • W/Z+g: add. photon in W/Z • Contributions from FSR g from lepton, and from fragmentation • Require isolated g • No TGC ZZg / Zgg vertex • Resuts agree with expectations Richard Hawkings
Photons and photon searches • Photon prodn is another window on LHC physics • Colourless probe of hard scattering, info on PDFs • Important for searches – e.g. Hgg or gg+missing ET • Inclusive isolated prompt photons from 20-400 GeV • In two steps due to evolving luminosity and triggers • Need to understand fake and fragmentation contribs • Good agreement with NLO theoretical predictions • Searches for narrow resonance in gg spectrum • Sensitive to Randall-Sundrum gravitons • Limits set at 545 / 920 GeV for k/MPL=0.02 (0.1) • Also searches with gg+MET for e.g. UED Richard Hawkings
Diphoton candidate event • Highest invariant mass pair for two ‘tight’ photons: mgg=679 GeV Richard Hawkings
W/Z+jets • Large samples of W/Z+n-jets available • Up to W+5 jets, Z+4 jets (each jet costs ~as) • Challenge for QCD calculations and background for top and new physics • Expt uncertainties dominated by jet energy scale • Study multiplicity and jet pT distributions • Good description by state-of-the art NLO calculations and LO multi-parton generators Richard Hawkings
Top quark production • Heaviest SM particle – interesting in its own right, and important background • Top decay tWb; Wln or qq: tt final states with 2, 1 (0) leptons, ETmiss and (b)-jets e-m candidate Richard Hawkings
Top cross-section measurements I • Simplest measurement from dilepton channel • ttWbWblνblνb with l=e or μ (5% of tt events) • Relatively clean final state – backgrounds from Z/g*+jets or fake leptons estimated from data control samples • Signal in ll+≥2 jets (no b-tagging), especially e-m channel • O(100) events in 2010 data – statistics limited • Higher statistics in semileptonic channel • ttWbWblνbjjb, l=e/μ (30%) • Lepton+≥4 jets selection, reconstruct mtop from 3 jets • Backgrounds from W+jets, and QCD (fake lepton) • B-tagging increases S/B • Combined analysis of 3 and ≥4 jet samples with 0,1,2 b-tags to maximise sensitivity Richard Hawkings
Top cross-section measurements • Combine l+jets (b-tag) and dilepton results • Including correlated systematics • QCD prediction for s(tt) depends on mtop • Interpret s(tt) measurement as measurement of top quark mass – complementary to direct recon • Directly sensitive to top quark pole mass • Analysis repeated with different MC templates • Result mtop=166.4+7.8-7.3 GeV Richard Hawkings
Direct measurement of the top quark mass • Enough data to start on mtop measurement • Fundamental SM param, relation to Higgs? • Measured to 1.1 GeV precision at Tevatron • Measurement in lepton+jets channel • Reconstruct mass of 3 jets (ttlνbjjb) • Major uncertainty due to jet energy scale • Known to 4-6% at this stage in ATLAS • Reduce using known W mass (tWbjjb) and measure R32=mtop/mW • Measure mtop=169.3±4.0±4.9 GeV • Systematics dominated by residual JES and b-jet uncertainties, plus ISR/FSR • Alternative methods - simultaneous kinematic fits of mtop and JES • Statistical error below 1 GeV for 1 fb-1 • Then techniques based on lepton pT, decay length, tbJ/ybecome viable Richard Hawkings
Top quark properties • Investigate helicity of W in top decay • θ* between W in top frame, l in W frame • Assume massless b-quark, fit F0 (FL=1-F0) • Fit F0=0.59±0.10±0.07 (SM value 0.70) • Search for new physics sources of top • E.g. top partner pairs TTtA0tA0 • A0 a stable neutral scalar – missing ET • Look for excess missing ET in lepton+jets • Tail dominated by tt dileptons with missed second lepton – veto loose second lepton • Exclude models around mT of 300 GeV e/m+jets channel Richard Hawkings
Single top production – a first look • Tops also produced singly • Substantial cross-sections, but b/g from W+jets and top pairs • t-chan: e/m, b-jet, Etmiss, fwd jet • Further cuts on h-jet, reco mtop • Signal concentrated in t not tbar • Fitted value st=53+46-36 pb • Limit of st<162 pb @ 95% CL • Wt: l+jets (Wqq), dilepton (ln) • Combined limit sWt<158 pb • More data needed … t-chan: 66pb Wt: 15pb t-chan Wt dilepton Richard Hawkings
Searches for supersymmetry • R-parity conserving SUSY at LHC • squark/gluino pair production giving cascades (jets/leptons) ending in LSP (missing-ET) • Characterised by Meff=ΣETjets+ΣETlep+ETmiss • 0-lepton analysis with jets and missing-ET • 2 and 3 jet regions for sensitivity to squark and gluino pairs – no excesses seen • 1-lepton analysis with 3 jets and missing-ET • Lepton gives trigger and reduces QCD b/g, but reduces signal acceptance • For both analyses, backgrounds measured separately in control regions Richard Hawkings
Supersymmetry limits • Null results – interpret in various simplified SUSY models • m0 vs m1/2 plane in MSUGRA/CMSSM framework, tanb=3, A0=0, m>0 • For equal squark and gluino mass,0+1 lepton combination excludes up to 815 GeV • Alternatively, set m(c10)=0, exclusion limits in (squark/gluino) mass plane Richard Hawkings
More exotic supersymmetry scenarios • Searches also performed in 2-leptons,3+ leptons, leptons+bjets, em dileptons … • Improves exclusion in various corners of SUSY parameter space • R-parity violating SUSY may give stable massive particles • Forming R-hadrons (bound state SUSY+SM) • Slow high-pT tracks with anomalous dE/dx (pixels) and timing for b=v/c<1 (TileCal) • Used to estimate candidate masses • Background estimated from data, using independence of pixel and tile results • Limits set on stable sbottom (294 GeV), stop (309 GeV), gluino (562-586 GeV) • Latter depends on model for interaction of gluino-gluon bound state with matter Richard Hawkings
The Standard Model Higgs • Full range of Higgs searches on 35pb-1 • Close to Tevatron limits on HWWlnln • Reaching close to 10x SM for 200-600 GeV • No hints of signal so far … • Interesting prospects for 2011-2012 run • With 1 fb-1 at 7 TeV, 50% chance to exclude 130-460 GeV if nothing there • With 5 fb-1 at 8 TeV, 3s for any mH<500 GeV • Only weakly dependent on the Ecm choice HZZllnn/llqq HWWlnqq HWWlnln Richard Hawkings
Higgs beyond the Standard Model • Inclusive search for MSSM A/H/ht+t- with lepton+hadronic tau decays • Signal reconstructed in tt visible mass, require low MT to reduce W, top b/g • Backgrounds estimated from data – QCD and W+jets using opposite/same sign • Zt+t-+jets from Zm+m-replacing muons with ‘embedded’ simulated t decays • No excess found – exclusion in (mA,tanb) plane extended beyond Tevatron Richard Hawkings
Summary and outlook • The LHC era has begun – already a huge harvest of physics results • LHC machine commissioning in 2010 was a spectacular success • 2011 running started mid February – ATLAS already recorded 26 pb-1 • Detector and trigger commissioning with high pileup, field-off runs for alignment • Expect ≥1fb-1 data this year if all goes well, more in 2012 • Many beautiful ATLAS physics results from 2010 data • ~25 physics papers submitted, >50 new preliminary results at winter conferences • Standard Model ‘rediscovered’ at LHC energies • Very detailed and precise studies in soft and hard QCD, W,Z and photon production • Becoming sensitive to diboson production • Top physics program started – already close to theory precision in ttbar cross-section • First steps into unexplored territory at the energy frontier • SUSY and other new physics searches beyond previous experiments • Higgs searches starting to become interesting • This is only the beginning – much more to come in 2011… Richard Hawkings