260 likes | 596 Views
Mosquito-borne Arbovirus Surveillance in West Virginia. Rachel Radcliffe, DVM, MPH CDC Career Epidemiology Field Officer Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology. Objectives. Describe arbovirus surveillance in WV Historical methods Plans for 2011
E N D
Mosquito-borne Arbovirus Surveillance in West Virginia Rachel Radcliffe, DVM, MPH CDC Career Epidemiology Field Officer Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Objectives • Describe arbovirus surveillance in WV • Historical methods • Plans for 2011 • Describe 2010 arbovirus surveillance data
Components of Mosquito-borne Arbovirus Surveillance • Species • Humans • Mosquitoes • Dead birds • Horses • Viruses • WNV • LAC • EEE • SLE
Human Surveillance • Local health departments receive reports from laboratories and healthcare providers • Conduct follow up to determine patient case status • Environmental investigation to provide education on mosquito-borne disease prevention
Arbovirus Case Definition — Clinical Criteria • Neuroinvasive disease • Fever (≥100.4°F or 38°C) AND • Meningitis, encephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis, or other acute signs of central or peripheral neurologic dysfunction, as documented by a physician, AND • Absence of a more likely clinical explanation. • Non-neuroinvasive disease • Fever (≥100.4°F or 38°C) AND • Absence of neuroinvasive disease AND • Absence of a more likely clinical explanation
Arbovirus Case Definition — Laboratory Criteria • Confirmatory Laboratory Criteria • Isolation of virus or demonstration of specific viral antigen or nucleic acid from tissue, blood, CSF, or other body fluid • Four-fold or greater change in virus-specific quantitative antibody titers in paired sera • Virus-specific IgM antibodies in serum with confirmatory virus-specific neutralizing antibodies in the same or a later specimen • Virus-specific IgM antibodies in CSF and a negative result for other IgM antibodies in CSF for arboviruses endemic to the region where exposure occurred • Probable Laboratory Criteria • Virus-specific IgM antibodies in CSF or serum
Arbovirus Case Classification — Confirmed • Neuroinvasive disease • Meets clinical criteria for neuroinvasive disease • One or more of the 4 confirmatory laboratory criteria • Non-neuroinvasive disease • Meets clinical criteria for non-neuroinvasive disease • One or more of the 4 confirmatory laboratory criteria
Arbovirus Case Classification — Probable • Neuroinvasive disease • Meets clinical criteria for neuroinvasive disease • Only has virus specific IgM antibodies in CSF or serum with no other testing • Non-neuroinvasive disease • Meets clinical criteria for non-neuroinvasive disease • Only has virus-specific IgM antibodies in CSF or serum with no other testing
2010 Human Surveillance Data • 8 cases of LAC reported from 5 counties • 4 confirmed and 4 probable • All neuroinvasive • Illness onsets occurred June–October • Median age of cases=7.5 years • 50% were female • No cases of WNV, SLE, or EEE reported
Travel-Associated Cases • Dengue • 2 cases • Travel included Honduras and Phillipines • Both hospitalized • Malaria • 3 cases • Travel included Nigeria and India • One hospitalization
Mosquito Surveillance • Routine mosquito trapping began in 2007 • Trapping occurred May–October in most years • Trapping historically focused in Jackson and Kanawha counties • Cabell and Ohio counties have also participated • Mosquitoes tested for arboviruses depending on species • Culex spp. tested for WNV and SLE • Non-Culex spp. tested for WNV, LAC, SLE, and EEE
2010 Mosquito Surveillance Data • Trapping only occurred May–August in 3 counties • 36,731 mosquitoes from 459 pools collected • 26 (5.7%) of 459 pools tested positive for WNV • Positive pools found in all 3 counties where trapping conducted • No pools positive for SLE, LAC, or EEE
2011 Plans for Mosquito Surveillance • New entomologist in DIDE • Regular mosquito trapping postponed • Assessing previous trapping methods and locations • May do larval studies in a portion of the state • Would like to see surveillance expanded to more parts of state
Dead Bird Surveillance • Collection kits sent to local health departments each spring • Freshly dead birds suitable specimens • Swab oral cavity of bird and send swab to OLS • ID numbers obtained from DIDE prior to OLS submission • Specimens tested for WNV, SLE, and EEE
2010 Dead Bird Surveillance Data • 9 dead bird samples tested • 0 were positive for WNV, SLE, and EEE • Specimens submitted from 8 counties
2011 Dead Bird Surveillance • Dead bird testing will continue • Specimen collection and suitable specimens are the same • Specimens should be sent to OLS • OLS will send to Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study for testing
Horse Surveillance • Veterinarians submitted horse serum samples to OLS • OLS sends specimens to National Veterinary Services Laboratory for WNV and EEE testing • Free testing service
2010 Horse Surveillance Data • 3 horse specimens submitted and tested • 0 were positive for WNV and EEE • Specimens received from 2 counties
2011 Horse Surveillance • Testing service will continue • Specimen collection and submission to OLS will remain the same • Advertising testing services through WV Veterinary Medical Association
Enhanced Passive Surveillance • HAN sent at beginning of season to healthcare providers • Letter sent to hospital laboratories • Communication with local health departments • More outreach to veterinarians in 2011
2011 Surveillance Activities • May 2 — Email memo • May 9 — Hospital laboratory letter • May 16 — HAN to healthcare providers
Arbovirus Surveillance Summary • LAC continues to be the major arbovirus affecting humans in WV • WNV continues to be detected in mosquitoes • Previous surveillance methods being reviewed • Want to expand surveillance • No arboviral cases detected in dead birds or horses • Submission numbers of both are declining • Assistance needed to increase submission numbers