120 likes | 258 Views
Board of Higher Education STEM Pipeline Fund. Robert H. Goddard Council April 3, 2007. STEM Pipeline Fund Overview. The Acts of 2003 Economic Stimulus Trust Fund legislation created the Massachusetts Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering Grant Fund (STEM Pipeline Fund).
E N D
Board of Higher Education STEM Pipeline Fund Robert H. Goddard Council April 3, 2007
STEM Pipeline Fund Overview • The Acts of 2003 Economic Stimulus Trust Fund legislation created the Massachusetts Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering Grant Fund (STEM Pipeline Fund). • Administered by the Board of Higher Education. • Legislative funding: • 2003: $2.5 million • 2006: $4.0 million
STEM Pipeline Fund Goals • Increase the number of Massachusetts students who participate in programs that support careers in fields related to mathematics, science, technology and engineering (STEM); • Increase the number of STEM teachers in the Commonwealth; and • Improve the STEM educational offerings available in public and private schools. Chapter 141 of the Acts of 2003
Need for Collaboration • Many STEM programs throughout Massachusetts but often fragmented and short-term in scope and scale. • Collaboration needs to include higher education, K-12, industry and state policymakers.
How Are We Addressing This? • The STEM Pipeline Fund established Regional Networks throughout the state to bring together stakeholders around regional STEM education. • The Board of Higher Education collaborates with other organizations and state agencies to coordinate policies and programs.
2004-2005 Funded Projects • $2.3 million distributed to 10 lead organizations and 35 partner organizations. • Led to $1.3m in leveraged funds. • 16 Regional Network and 3 statewide projects: • 11 student interest/career projects. • Equal focus on middle and high school. • Largely equal focus across STEM subjects. • Numbers served: • 4,555 students and 521 teachers. • 235 schools in 115 districts.
2007 Funded Projects • $1.7 million announced to 6 lead organizations and approximately 50 partner organizations. • Three-year grants support Networks, projects. • Funding encumbered for all three years, but disbursement only with evidence of progress. • 19 regional projects supported by the Networks: • 50% serve middle school students and/or teachers. • 33% student enrichment and interest programs; 66% teacher professional development programs. • 40% focus on science and/or engineering projects.
Continuous Evaluation • Three-part statewide evaluation by the University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute: • Surveys of Network members. • Analysis of individual project evaluations. • Massachusetts Statewide STEM Indicators Project (MASSIP): collection of K-12, higher education and economic data to review progress of the pipeline of future STEM workers in Massachusetts and against competitor states.
P-16 Alignment in Regions and State • Regional PreK-16 Networks assist grassroots STEM education: • Align programs among partners. • Replicate programs from other regions. • Leverage other funding. • Collaboration with Department of Education. • Growing interest among workforce development stakeholders. • MTC, AIM, High Tech Council in proposal review; Intel and MBAE in programs.
State Policy and Program Alignment • Work with Department of Education and University of Massachusetts to develop “map” of statewide STEM programs. • Pursue application for new STEM-focused National Governors Association grant. • Sponsor math faculty working group on defining content of elementary school teacher test. • Define Goddard Council role in STEM P-16 alignment.
Next Steps: Project Development • Implement Scholar-Internship Match Fund, also supported through 2006 Economic Stimulus. • Assess sample of alternative teacher certification programs throughout the state. • Build on best practices from other states/ national/international. • Define Goddard Council role in setting program priorities. • Secure FY2008 funding for next year of five-year commitment.