120 likes | 251 Views
Panel 3. Collaboration between Crucial Partners. Conceptual Framework EQUAL. EQUAL has brought a change in EU - promotion policy : Net-working as a pre-condition for promotion EQUAL requires the networking of strategic and operational partners
E N D
Panel 3 Collaboration between Crucial Partners
Conceptual Framework EQUAL • EQUAL has brought a change in EU - promotion policy: Net-working as a pre-condition for promotion • EQUAL requires the networking of strategic and operational partners • Their co-operation is formalised in Development Partnerships (DP’s) • Within EQUAL there is the sub-topic of Asylum Seekers with about 40 Development partnerships throughout the Union
Scope of Practice in the 5 DP’s • All projects belong to Development Partnerships • Some are organized in a top-down way (BTW, ENEAS, HIT) • The others (JobShop, SEPA) from bottom-up • The two approaches have effects on scope of method testing, mainstreaming, sustainability, target group orientation
DP JobShop, Austria, a Regional ProjectMr. K. Burger • Partners: • Overall Coordination:Refugee Coordination Department of the Province of Tyrol • Operative: Caritas: Mobile Counselling; Institute for Vocational Training bfi: Language & Vocational Training; Austrian Society for Emergency Psychology (ÖGNP): Psychological Service • Strategic: Land of People - Tyrol, Austrian Federation of Trade Unions – Executive Division forthe Province of Tyrol (ÖGB), Tyrolean Chamber of Commerce (WKO), Employment Exchange (AMS) • Achievements: • Close co-operation between partners • Regular meetings and information exchange • Psychological support for partners • Future: • Use the network in the future for the benefit of asylum seekers
DP ENEAS, Spain, a National ProjectMrs. M. Hernández Encabo • Partners: • Strategic:4 Refugee Reception Centres (State Secretariat of Immigration and Emigration); 3 NGO´s: CEAR, ACCEM, Red Cross • Operative:No partners as DP members. Great amount of collaborations with private/public organisations and others • Achievements: • National collaboration/ coordination and network among all organisations concerning capacity building of asylum seekers • Future: • Continuing the collaboration during EQUAL II phase in order to develop the collaboration to a higher level • After the EQUAL II phase continuation of existing collaboration
DP Back to Work, NLa Regional ProjectMr. C. Oosterveld • Partners: • Strategic: Reception asylum seekers, COA; Municipalities, VGG; Province of Groningen; Trade Union, FNV; Employers, MKB;Association of refugees, VON • Operative: Vocational training, Alfa-college • Achievements: • Collaboration and tuningbetween COA and Municipalities • Collaboration and tuning COA and Educational Institutes • Future: • Continuing collaboration with Educational Institutes on lower, secondary and higher level • Collaboration with the department Care and Welfare of the Province with the scope on training of asylum seekers
DP HIT, Netherlands, a Regional ProjectMr. M. Maussen • Partners: • Strategic: Reception asylum seekers, COA; Municipalities; Employers Organisation LWV and LOZO; Trade Union FNV; Province of Limburg • Operative:No partners in the DP • Achievements: • Strategic partnership prevents financial conflict of interest • Stakeholders united • Development takes place in regular structures • Future: • No Equal, no collaboration
DP SEPA, Germany,a Regional ProjectMrs. A. Warnking • Partners: • Strategic: Ministry of Education, Ministry of Women Labour Health an Social Affairs, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Sport, Trade Chamber of Saarland • Operative: Welfare Organisations, Caritas, DRK LV Saarland; Training, KEB, AWO; Research institutes, AGEF Saar, ISOPLAN • Achievements: • Avoided duplication of activities on strategic and operative level by focussing on an integrated programme • Linking training institutes and psycho-social counselling services • Future: • Continuing the collaboration under conditions of EQUAL II phase
Trans-nationalCo-operation • Partners: • ECASE: JobShop, Back To Work, ENEAS • RAISE: SEPA, HIT • Achievements: • Acquaintance with and comparison of policies and implementation procedures for Asylum Seekers in EU countries • Dissemination of results on an European level • Future: • In 2006 the second conference on vocational training for asylum seekers in the EU
General Statements • The new policy to promote only Development Partnerships seems to be more effective – in national and trans-national cooperation • DP’s following the top-down approach are more in line with Government policy • DP’s following the bottom-up approach can within the defined working area operate independently – partly in opposition to Government policy • Through both types of collaboration integrated programmes for asylum seekers can be created • Continuing collaboration is only possible by funding of EQUAL and/or Government
Political Conclusions • Acceptance of the thematic field Asylum Seekers will only be possible when policy makers on local, regional, national and European level do co-operate in Development Partnerships, with non-governmental organisations • Without structural support from the local, regional, national and European level, DP’s cannot perform effectively • Trans-national co-operation should feed policy makers from the EU, in order to implement trans-national results in European policy
Panel 3 Collaboration between Crucial Partners