1 / 14

Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems

Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems. Kate Forbes-Riley, Diane Litman , Scott Silliman, Amruta Purandare University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Outline. Introduction WOZ-TUT System Experimental Design Uncertainty Corpus Description

allene
Download Presentation

Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Uncertainty Corpus: Resource to Study User Affect in Complex Spoken Dialogue Systems Kate Forbes-Riley, Diane Litman, Scott Silliman, Amruta PurandareUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh, PA, USA

  2. Outline • Introduction • WOZ-TUT System • Experimental Design • Uncertainty Corpus Description • Uses of the Uncertainty Corpus

  3. Automatic Detection: promising across affective states and applications, e.g. (Craig et al., 2006; Litman & Forbes-Riley, 2006; Lee & Narayanan, 2005; Vidrascu & Devillers, 2005; Batliner et al., 2003) Larger goal is automatic adaptation, but results are sparser More public affect-annotated corpora of human-computer dialogues could help, e.g. HUMAINE project SYMPAFLY, AIBO (Batliner et al., 2004) (German) Communicator (Walker et al., 2001; Ang et al., 2002) (English) Uncertainty Corpus: new complex domain: spoken dialogue tutoring new affect annotation: student uncertainty Overview: Towards Affect-Adaptive Spoken Dialogue Systems

  4. WOZ-TUT:Adaptive Wizard of OZ Tutoring System modified version of ITSPOKE (Litman & Silliman, 2004) system responses based on combined uncertainty and correctness human recognizes speech, annotates uncertainty and correctness Why uncertainty? Most frequent in ITSPOKE corpora (Forbes-Riley & Litman, 2007) Most systems respond only to correctness, but literature suggests uncertain and incorrect answers signal learning impasses What uncertainty adaptation? Treating uncertain+correct answers as incorrect should provide additional knowledge to bridge impasse Uncertainty Corpus Collection: WOZ-TUT System

  5. WOZ-TUT Screenshot

  6. 3 Conditions: used parameterized WOZ-TUT dialogue manager Experimental: treat all uncertain+correct turns as incorrect First Control: ignore uncertainty (logged) Second Control: ignore uncertainty (logged), but treated a percentage of random correct answers as incorrect Experimental Design

  7. TUTOR: What will the velocity of the object be a second after that (where the initial velocity is 9.8m/s and the acceleration is 9.8m/s2)? STUDENT: Nineteen point six meters per second?? [uncertain+correct] TUTOR in First Control Condition moves on: Good. So at every point in time during the fall of the man and his keys, how do their velocities compare with each other? TUTOR in Experimental Condition remediates: Okay. As we have seen, if a falling object has an acceleration of 9.8m/s2, its velocity changes by 9.8m/s every second. So if a second after it began falling its velocity is 9.8m/s, a second later its velocity will be 9.8m/s + 9.8m/s = 19.6m/s. So what will its velocity be a second after that? Corpus Excerpts

  8. 60 subjects randomly assigned to 3 conditions (gender-balanced) Native English speakers with no college physics Procedure: 1) read background material, 2) took pretest, 3) worked training problem with WOZ-TUT, 4) took posttest, 5) worked isomorphic test problem with non-adaptive WOZ-TUT Experimental Procedure

  9. 120 dialogues from 60 students (.ogg format) 20 total hours of dialogue Student turns manually transcribed, including disfluency and non-syntactic question annotation Tutor turns and Wizard annotations in log files Corpus Description

  10. One-way ANOVAs showed no significant differences: number of correct, uncertain, or uncertain+correct turns number adapted-to turns (EXP vs CTRL2) Student Answer Attributes

  11. Uses of the Uncertainty Corpus I • Compare student performance across conditions to isolate impact of uncertainty adaptation • No significant differences in learning • We are comparing dialogue-based metrics in the isomorphic test problem (Forbes-Riley, Litman and Rotaru, 2008) - Feedback confound identified and rectified in larger follow-on study

  12. Uses of the Uncertainty Corpus II • Resource for analyzing linguistic features of naturally-occurring user affect in human-computer dialogue • Models built from elicited emotions generally transfer poorly to naturally-occurring dialogue (Cowie and Cornelius, 2003; Batliner et al., 2003) • Uncertainty Corpus provides a new resource for modeling naturally-occurring dialogue • Large number of features in speech, transcript, log files

  13. Summary and Current Directions • The Uncertainty Corpus is a collection of tutorial dialogues between students and an adaptive Wizard-of-Oz spoken dialogue system • Corpus (speech, transcripts, uncertainty and correctness annotations) publicly available by request through the Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center: https://learnlab.web.cmu.edu/datashop/index.jsp • Follow-on experiments and corpora • Larger WOZ study just completed, with learning results! • Fully automated study to begin Fall 2008

  14. Questions? Further Information? web search: ITSPOKE or PSLC Thank You!

More Related