80 likes | 201 Views
Cema realignment review. Human Resources September 26, 2014. Purpose of the Review. Understand the Criteria for Realignment Review Share Lessons Learned from Other Realignment Reviews. Realignment Review Criteria Comparable Job Specs Staffin g Challenges and Cost Comparable Jurisdictions
E N D
Cema realignment review Human Resources September 26, 2014
Purpose of the Review • Understand the Criteria for Realignment Review • Share Lessons Learned from Other Realignment Reviews
Realignment Review Criteria Comparable Job Specs Staffing Challenges and Cost Comparable Jurisdictions Internal Relationships Effective Wage
Effective Wage – PERS Misc. • 7% for PERS Miscellaneous • 0.49% for Special Compensation • 3% for changing from 2% at 60 to 2% at 55 • Total = 10.49% • Adjusted for Self-funded pay raise of 5.436% • Net Effective Wage = 5.054%
Effective Wage – PERS Safety – Probation Manager and Supervising Probation Counselor • 7% for PERS Safety • 0.49% for Special Compensation • Total = 7.49% • Adjusted for Self-funded pay raise of 5.436% • Net Effective Wage = 2.054%
Effective Wage – PERS Safety – Park Ranger Supervisor & Park Ranger Operations Manager • 2% for PERS Safety • 0.49% for Special Compensation • Total = 2.49% • Adjusted for Self-funded pay raise of 5.201% • Net Effective Wage = -3.161%
Lessons Learned • Make sure job specs are comparable • Use quantifiable data • Stick with jurisdictions listed on the criteria • Document your sources
Summary • Know how the criteria are applied • Apply lessons learned