250 likes | 404 Views
An Example of a Tier 3 Inventory Method: Soil Organic C Stock Changes. Lead Compilers: Stephen M. Ogle (Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University) Keith Paustian (NREL and Dept. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University)
E N D
An Example of a Tier 3 Inventory Method:Soil Organic C Stock Changes Lead Compilers: Stephen M. Ogle (Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University) Keith Paustian (NREL and Dept. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University) F. Jay Breidt (Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University) For more information: US-EPA National GHG Inventory Report, 2008
Complexity Accuracy IPCC Method Tiers
Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development
Climate Soils Management Land Use Change Century Model CO2 CO2 Water Balance Submodel Plant Growth Submodel SOM Submodel Residues CO2 CO2 CO2 CO2 Active SOM Slow SOM Passive SOM CO2 CO2
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
Johnson County, IA 563 points Note: points not spatially referenced US National Resources Inventory (NRI): Point-Based Survey Data Source: US Dept. of Agriculture
Other Key Input Data • Tillage Practices, Conservation Technology Information Center • Mineral Fertilizer Rates, USDA-ERS • Manure amendment application rates by crop type (USDA-NRCS) • Manure available for amendment (US-EPA) • Municipal sewage amendment to agricultural soils (US-EPA)
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
NRI Expansion Factors PDF PDF PDF PDF Uncertainty Framework Input Uncertainty Tillage Practices NRI Survey Sample σ2 Century Model Results Mineral N Fertilization 95% Confidence Interval Manure Amendments Structural Uncertainty
Model Input Uncertainty Tillage Practices (CTIC) Johnson County, IA PDF PDF PDF Mineral N Fertilization (USDA-ERS) Manure Amendments (USDA and EPA) Monte Carlo Analysis
Uncertainty in NRI Survey NRI Survey is a Two Stage Sample Johnson County, IA NRI Weights NRI survey sample σ2
Model Structural Uncertainty • Model algorithms (i.e., equations), parameterization and measurement error • Empirically-Based Approached • Simulate management impacts on SOC storage for experimental sites • ca. 50 sites with over 800 management treatment observations • Linear mixed effect models • Adjust for biases and apply a measure of precision associated with model predictions
B A C D Measured Soil C Stock Modeled Soil C Stock Structural Uncertainty: Theoretical Relationships
Century Structural Uncertainty Ogle et al. 2007, Ecological Modelling
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
Environmental Conditions Model Inputs Database Management Activity Point Scale Data (NRI Survey) PDF Data Management Results Database Structural Unc. Estimator Run Control Simulation Model: Century Implementation Framework
Totals for US Croplands (1990s) Totals for US Croplands (i.e., Major Crops) 2006: -64.0 ± 16% Tg CO2 eq. yr-1
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
Tier 3 Guidance (Adapted from 2006 IPCC Guidelines) Model Selection/Development Does not capture general trends from experimental data? Model Evaluation Unable to locate appropriate input data? Identify Model Inputs Assess Uncertainties Implement Model Model Results deemed unacceptable due to mismatch with evaluation data? Evaluation with Independent Data (Good Practice) Reporting/Documentation
Consideration for Reporting Tier 3 Inventory Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 • Tier 3 more complex and can provide more accurate estimates of GHG emissions! • However, National Inventory Report (NIR) must provide transparent explanation of inventory methods, which is a challenge for Tier 3! Complexity Transparency