1 / 18

The Fundamentals of Cross Examination

The Fundamentals of Cross Examination. By Dror Bikel, Esq. of Bikel & Mandarano, LLP. “Cross-examination, the ‘greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.’” Justice Byron White – California v. Green , 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970), quoting 5 Wigmore Section 1367.

almira
Download Presentation

The Fundamentals of Cross Examination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Fundamentals ofCrossExamination By Dror Bikel, Esq. of Bikel & Mandarano, LLP

  2. “Cross-examination, the ‘greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.’” Justice Byron White – California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970), quoting 5 Wigmore Section 1367. • We’re in the persuasion business • Facts persuade

  3. A fact is something that occurred or is actually the case. Something that is verifiable • Legalisms – “she was negligent” or conclusions “He is a bad parent” do not persuade

  4. Instead of relying solely on the cross-examiner’s own witnesses to support a theory of the case, the skilled trail attorney views the opponent’s witnesses as equal opportunities to develop her theory of the case.

  5. The cross-examiner is not trying to base the cross-examination on emotion, presence, and oratory. She is not trying to be louder, more demonstrative, more fearsome in the courtroom. The cross-examination should be 100% percent about teaching the cross-examiner’s theory of the case to the fact-finder.

  6. Importance of Primacy • Importance of Recency • Importance of Repetition

  7. Looping – An Important Technique to Ensure Repetition Step 1 – through a leading question establish a desired fact or phrase Step 2 – Use the fact or phrase in the body of the next question, without re-asking the fact or phrase Step 3 –Attach the looped fact to a safe fact in the second question.

  8. Example 1 Q: The car was speeding A: Yes Q: The speeding car crossed the intersection. A: Yes Example 2 Q: What happened to Cindy was an incredibly terrible event A: Yes Q: After you learned of this incredibly terrible event, you called your supervisor A: Yes

  9. Three Rules of Cross Examination 1. Ask Leading Questions Only • Suggest an answer in the question. • The question should be phrased as a short declarative statement • Example: “Your shirt is blue, correct?” • Non-Leading Questions is a question that does not suggest an answer. • Example: “What color is your shirt?”

  10. This is the fundamental distinction between direct and cross-examination. It is the absolutely critical advantage that the cross-examiner has, and it must always be pressed.

  11. The first question is non-leading. It’s an open ended question The second question is leading, but it dies not declare the answer The third question is the most suggestive of an answer. It declares the answer. Leading questions allow the cross examiner to become a teacher. Consider the following: • How do you feel about eating ice cream? • Do you enjoy eating ice cream? • You like to eat ice cream? -The first question is non-leading. It’s an open ended question -The second question is leading, but it does not declare the answer -The third question is the most suggestive of an answer. It declares the answer.

  12. Begin each question with a pronoun if possible. “You” or “We” or “He/She” or “They” Questions that begin with Who, What, When, Where, how, Why, or Explain. These words invite open ended answers – the plague of the cross-examiner

  13. Vague, equivocal or subjective words do not count as facts Q: You caught the red ball “well”? Note: “well” is subjective A: What does “well” mean. I don’t know – I caught it.

  14. Same question Q: You caught the ball A: Yes Q: You caught the red ball A: Yes Q: You caught the red ball with one hand A: Yes Q: You caught the red ball with one hand while running A: Yes Q: You caught the red ball well A: Yes

  15. 2. One New Fact Per Question 3. Break the cross-examination into a series of logical progressions to a specific goal The goal should be factual, not conclusory. Build the story around your factual goal by asking one leading question at a time, containing one new fact per question.

  16. The Chapter Method of Cross Examination • Each chapter is an individual theme that supports a theory of the case. Each chapter has its own beginning and its own end. • The chapter method gives the cross examiner control of the topics of the cross examination. Chapters help to break the case down to understandable parts.

  17. Draft chapters backwards • Build a story around each chapter.

  18. Must Read: Cross-Examination: Science and Techniques, by Larry S. Pozner and Roger Dodd The How-to-Win Trial Manual, by Ralph Adam Fine

More Related